I agree with you, anyway has Chris replied the PM estebanus sent?TSA_383 wrote...
Which will go nowhere for a whole variety of reasons, largely the "EA owns the rights to mass effect games and there's no way in a million years they'd let you distribute it" angle.Brazukka wrote...
Project VerumArian Dynas wrote...
Hey guys, what have I been missing, besides this moron?
Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#4951
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:35
#4952
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:36
masster blaster wrote...
Taboo--XX you also have to conisder it's an fully grown AI that had the power to stop this anytime it wanted to, and it is he thought his causing all of the Conflict mostly. The Rachni wars because of it. The geth siding with the Reapers because it rewrote the geth codes. The brat child is always giving an excuse to save it's self and I don't blame it, but trillions of organics and synthetics have been harvested and killed so that makes about Trillions of beings being killed in each cycle.
Hell I would not want the Reapers to live even. Though the Catalyst wants this. No it's time we stop needing the Reapers and choose our own path, and I don't mean Destroy because well that's something we still have to talk about/ refuse.
That's my point.
He causes just as many problems as he claims to solve.
He's nothing more than an AI who says things he was programmed to say.
He'd tell you the sun burned cold if he was programmed to.
#4953
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:36
#4954
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:36
"Anyone who does not like the IT or thinks it not to be correct is STRONGLY enouraged to stay away from discussion on it."
#4955
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:37
Mostly just individuals that fail to see that the catalyst (regardless of IT) contradicts himself several times. I think it's time I dug up my "Reaper's say the darndest things" series again. Otherwise it's just people putting too much stock into what Priestly has to say; which oddly enough is an example of people giving a person who constantly contradicts himself too much credit.Arian Dynas wrote...
Hey guys, what have I been missing, besides this moron?
#4956
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:37
Iconoclaste wrote...
Oh! The one who sent me to "hang myself" a while ago. Remember?Arian Dynas wrote...
Hey guys, what have I been missing, besides this moron?
Now, who are you calling a moron here?
I think he was talking about I_eat_unicorns... And be honest man, even though you've improved since yesterday (As far as I can tell.), if yesterday was any indication of your previous behavior (My memory on Literlists/trolls is a little hazy at times.
Modifié par Dwailing, 05 août 2012 - 04:40 .
#4957
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:39
#4958
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:39
Brazukka wrote...
I agree with you, anyway has Chris replied the PM estebanus sent?TSA_383 wrote...
Which will go nowhere for a whole variety of reasons, largely the "EA owns the rights to mass effect games and there's no way in a million years they'd let you distribute it" angle.Brazukka wrote...
Project VerumArian Dynas wrote...
Hey guys, what have I been missing, besides this moron?
No idea (Promise I'll leave after this, lol.), but I'm not so sure. If we don't actually PROFIT from this, and we keep it amongst the IT community, we might be able to do it. People make fan games all the time. They're like fan fiction.
#4959
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:41
Taboo-XX wrote...
TJBartlemus wrote...
I_eat_unicorns wrote...
Taken from Taboo-XX from another thread I created:
I don't. The scene with the Catalyst is absolutely ludicrous. You aren't supposed to take everything at face value, the devs have said this.
The endings are symbolic.
You grabs the reigns of Control
You leap into the unknown in Synthesis
You blow **** up in Destroy
It's more a bad implementation of surrealism than it is anything else. And that's why it's AWFUL.
If you actually read my post, you would know that I never said you can stop believing in IT, I only say it's just not true, like fan-theories are. They aren't true. The fact that you dismiss my posts with "opinion opinion blah blah" shows how little capacity you have for others who hold against your own beliefs. Which parts of my posts are opinions? What makes my post "blah blah"? How did you respond to 1/2 of my post before I posted?
Try to form a contstructive argument before raging and yelling at me.
Hehe. Your funny. You go on to say literalism is true and IT is false yet you plainly say the bolded. Contradictory much?
That's MY post, not his.
Do not take MY opinion of something to twist his words.
You have every right to an opinion, which is what I said.
Don't confuse the two.
Sorry about that....missed that portion of the post.
#4960
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:43
masster blaster wrote...
Taboo that's why we just use Andersons BS line to explain the Catalyst, yet there is some truth to what he says but when it comes to the dier questions that's when the BS starts.
It functions on faulty logic. It contradicts itself but it doesn't lie. It's intent is not so much malicious as it is simply mechanical.
The Reapers are a work around to the problem, they are not a solution. He has been failing at his programmed task for millions of years. He doesn't see this as an issue because it prevents the problem, even at the expense of organic life.
He hasn't taken in new variables for that time as well.
This cycle is different, Shepard simply being there provides him with new variables.
The best option is still Destroy regardless, but not because the other two kill you. It's far more complicated than an "Us and Them" scenario.
#4961
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:43
I will simply point out that, by its very "ongoing work in progress", the IT "is not to be correct", yet everyone here is still here, debating it. Or do you suggest that everyone here agrees on the same sets of facts and events, and same interpretation? Because just yesterday I addressed this, and it didn't look like it. Today, it looks like there is dissension upon the term "Leviathan", and I don't see any kind of consensus except the one saying "The endings suck". Plus, I don't think encouraging "opposition" to leave could be in any way an autorisation for anyone to act in a way contrary to the rules of the BSN.Simon_Says wrote...
Guys. Did you link Chris' previous statement regarding IT?
"Anyone who does not like the IT or thinks it not to be correct is STRONGLY enouraged to stay away from discussion on it."
That been said, I've read lots of "Arian posts", I can see he's a good writer and asset to your cause, but I have a bookmark and a memory, just in case... I also wish to move forward, and get whatever I can to work out my "perfect ending", just like all of you.
Modifié par Iconoclaste, 05 août 2012 - 04:46 .
#4962
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:45
#4963
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:47
'Iconoclaste wrote...
Oh! The one who sent me to "hang myself" a while ago. Remember?Arian Dynas wrote...
Hey guys, what have I been missing, besides this moron?
Now, who are you calling a moron here?
I've never told anyone to hang themselves.
And for the record, I'm talking about Taboo. Not you.
I will however call you a bit presumptious and somewhat conceited for the assumption that I WAS talking about you.
#4964
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:48
#4965
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:49
TSA_383 wrote...
Which will go nowhere for a whole variety of reasons, largely the "EA owns the rights to mass effect games and there's no way in a million years they'd let you distribute it" angle.Brazukka wrote...
Project VerumArian Dynas wrote...
Hey guys, what have I been missing, besides this moron?
Thats... insane. In all honesty.
#4966
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:49
Arian Dynas wrote...
'Iconoclaste wrote...
Oh! The one who sent me to "hang myself" a while ago. Remember?Arian Dynas wrote...
Hey guys, what have I been missing, besides this moron?
Now, who are you calling a moron here?
I've never told anyone to hang themselves.
And for the record, I'm talking about Taboo. Not you.
I will however call you a bit presumptious and somewhat conceited for the assumption that I WAS talking about you.
That isn't very polite. What have I done to you?
I came in to respond to something and then gave an opinion.
If I offended I aplogize, but I won't change my stance on things.
#4967
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:51
#4968
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:52
Although i don't think it can be done i really like the idea as it was presented,if EA/Bioware allow us we might be able to do it,but it will take time and dedicated people , there is simply too much involved.Dwailing wrote...
Brazukka wrote...
I agree with you, anyway has Chris replied the PM estebanus sent?TSA_383 wrote...
Which will go nowhere for a whole variety of reasons, largely the "EA owns the rights to mass effect games and there's no way in a million years they'd let you distribute it" angle.Brazukka wrote...
Project VerumArian Dynas wrote...
Hey guys, what have I been missing, besides this moron?
No idea (Promise I'll leave after this, lol.), but I'm not so sure. If we don't actually PROFIT from this, and we keep it amongst the IT community, we might be able to do it. People make fan games all the time. They're like fan fiction.
#4969
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:52
I know you, that's enough. I think you lack perspective of your own behavior, but it's common place here on some days. Glad to see you wish for peace with a grin...Arian Dynas wrote...
I've never told anyone to hang themselves.
And for the record, I'm talking about Taboo. Not you.
I will however call you a bit presumptious and somewhat conceited for the assumption that I WAS talking about you.
#4970
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:53
Taboo-XX wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
'Iconoclaste wrote...
Oh! The one who sent me to "hang myself" a while ago. Remember?Arian Dynas wrote...
Hey guys, what have I been missing, besides this moron?
Now, who are you calling a moron here?
I've never told anyone to hang themselves.
And for the record, I'm talking about Taboo. Not you.
I will however call you a bit presumptious and somewhat conceited for the assumption that I WAS talking about you.
That isn't very polite. What have I done to you?
I came in to respond to something and then gave an opinion.
If I offended I aplogize, but I won't change my stance on things.
I've seen you trolling nearly every IT or IT related thread out there, including several of mine. You come in, make your smartass remark and leave, giving nothing to the discussion or indeed acting with any kind of decorum. I have seen you, I know you, you're the worst kind of cynic, the kind who fails to understand cynicsm and chooses to ensure that others share your pessimism, hiding behind a shield of barbs and calling it "education".
#4971
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:54
Iconoclaste wrote...
I know you, that's enough. I think you lack perspective of your own behavior, but it's common place here on some days. Glad to see you wish for peace with a grin...Arian Dynas wrote...
I've never told anyone to hang themselves.
And for the record, I'm talking about Taboo. Not you.
I will however call you a bit presumptious and somewhat conceited for the assumption that I WAS talking about you.
I would never wish someone to hang themselves, simply for the fact that I know exactly what happens when you do. It's why I would never say someone to go "Die in a fire" unless I really meant it.
#4972
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:56
#4973
Posté 05 août 2012 - 04:56
They merely said they will make no further changes to the ending.
We've known that since the EC, and I never expected them to.
What I DO expect is not an ending but an EPILOGUE, which they have not said a word about. I'm not expecting THE EXTENDED EXTENDED CUT, I'm expecting The Arrival 2.0
#4974
Posté 05 août 2012 - 05:01
Taboo-XX wrote...
TJBartlemus wrote...
I_eat_unicorns wrote...
Taken from Taboo-XX from another thread I created:
I don't. The scene with the Catalyst is absolutely ludicrous. You aren't supposed to take everything at face value, the devs have said this.
The endings are symbolic.
You grabs the reigns of Control
You leap into the unknown in Synthesis
You blow **** up in Destroy
It's more a bad implementation of surrealism than it is anything else. And that's why it's AWFUL.
If you actually read my post, you would know that I never said you can stop believing in IT, I only say it's just not true, like fan-theories are. They aren't true. The fact that you dismiss my posts with "opinion opinion blah blah" shows how little capacity you have for others who hold against your own beliefs. Which parts of my posts are opinions? What makes my post "blah blah"? How did you respond to 1/2 of my post before I posted?
Try to form a contstructive argument before raging and yelling at me.
Hehe. Your funny. You go on to say literalism is true and IT is false yet you plainly say the bolded. Contradictory much?
That's MY post, not his.
Do not take MY opinion of something to twist his words.
You have every right to an opinion, which is what I said.
Don't confuse the two.
I only meant to use Taboo's well written explanation of "not taking things at face value" because I meant to address just that. IT supporters think there's more, but Taboo worded it perfectly of "not taking things at face value" rather than the overboard IT.
#4975
Posté 05 août 2012 - 05:02




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





