Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#50251
Posté 23 novembre 2012 - 11:58
Again, the content is there, the attitude just doesn't help the cause.
#50252
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:00
Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 24 novembre 2012 - 12:01 .
#50253
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:01
It's called a Citadel DLC... we DO end up at the Citadel at the end of the game.. this could be very interesting.
#50254
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:03
So, how's now the leaked DLC list doing? Did it actually predict all this?IronSabbath88 wrote...
So did you all see that response from a BioWare dev that all the writers are going to be involved with the next DLC?
It's called a Citadel DLC... we DO end up at the Citadel at the end of the game.. this could be very interesting.
#50255
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:04
Any ideas on where to post it? I mean, it's 32851 words. I could post it on this thread. Some of it isn't special (I.E. just things I liked or funny things) but there is a lot of good info for sure.Restrider wrote...
YOU ! HERE! I want to see your most-valuable-post-collection, please
@MB Yeah, I'll do that soonish. Maybe when we reach ~page 2100.
#50256
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:04
Restrider wrote...
So, how's now the leaked DLC list doing? Did it actually predict all this?IronSabbath88 wrote...
So did you all see that response from a BioWare dev that all the writers are going to be involved with the next DLC?
It's called a Citadel DLC... we DO end up at the Citadel at the end of the game.. this could be very interesting.
The leaked list is probably a load of bull... but the fact that every writer is involved in this could mean something really big.
#50257
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:04
IronSabbath88 wrote...
So did you all see that response from a BioWare dev that all the writers are going to be involved with the next DLC?
It's called a Citadel DLC... we DO end up at the Citadel at the end of the game.. this could be very interesting.
I wonder if the Citadel DLC will include the cut Citadel quest with Xen where she accuses Tali of sleeping with Shepard.
#50258
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:05
#50259
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:05
MegumiAzusa wrote...
It's the sense of superiority about everyone here sends out. And the regular bashings of other threads that don't conform to the limited view presented here.byne wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Don't worry, it's either "that is nonsense" or "we ignore it". They are not more open to discussion then any other group.
Megumi, you've been way more negative than usual lately. Whats up with that?
Have you checked the other threads in the "spoilers allowed" forum? If anything the other threads are much worse than the IT thread. I agree some have given out those feelings to the rest of the community but why judge the whole by the few? Not everyone is like that. There are a lot of individuals here that are intelligent, polite, and contribute to the BSN society. So to stereotype us all is to be arrogant like the rest of the people who slam on the IT without fully knowing what it is. The IT thread is a beacon of hope to the fans of the series and I hope it stays that way for as long as this thread exists.
#50260
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:06
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Any ideas on where to post it? I mean, it's 32851 words. I could post it on this thread. Some of it isn't special (I.E. just things I liked or funny things) but there is a lot of good info for sure.Restrider wrote...
YOU ! HERE! I want to see your most-valuable-post-collection, please
@MB Yeah, I'll do that soonish. Maybe when we reach ~page 2100.
I already said pastebin. I dont actually know how pastebin works though.
You could give it a shot though!
#50261
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:06
Wait, all the writers? Sounds interesting indeed...IronSabbath88 wrote...
So did you all see that response from a BioWare dev that all the writers are going to be involved with the next DLC?
It's called a Citadel DLC... we DO end up at the Citadel at the end of the game.. this could be very interesting.
#50262
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:06
I never said all, I always said most, if not I messed it up.byne wrote...
Megumi, can I ask how your 'Everyone but me is doing it wrong' attitude isn't a sense of superiority?
This doesn't change the fact that people here can't make up arguments to break a logical conclusion but attack something not related to the base of it that is only in proximity. Right after bashing the latest literal thread and saying how they are not able to argument.
#50263
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:06
badmojo88 wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
.badmojo88 wrote...
...more IT really? please someone rick roll this now and put an end to this suffering! lol
If you disagree, state your reasons why. Otherwise, leave us to do what the developers intended: speculation.
1. Developers intend speculation and purposefully make the ending ambiguous
2. Playerbase cries bad writing and that everyone should take the ending at face value
3. Playerbase does not realize they are doing the exact opposite of what the developers intended. Make fun of the speculators anyway.
4. PROFIT???
I don't need to, -Bioware themselves- openly shot IT down at pax, their making plans to move on to ME4, IT would have been awsome if it were true, but since Bioware is not interested in embracing it-or rather EA. This is just people grasping at straws.
F***ing lol. Sorry, buddy, but your old debunked talking points are the straws being grasped.
Modifié par BatmanTurian, 24 novembre 2012 - 12:07 .
#50264
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:08
#50265
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:09
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Wait, all the writers? Sounds interesting indeed...IronSabbath88 wrote...
So did you all see that response from a BioWare dev that all the writers are going to be involved with the next DLC?
It's called a Citadel DLC... we DO end up at the Citadel at the end of the game.. this could be very interesting.Can you find a link?
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/323/index/12486978/112#15028852
#50266
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:10
Go to the pagebyne wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Any ideas on where to post it? I mean, it's 32851 words. I could post it on this thread. Some of it isn't special (I.E. just things I liked or funny things) but there is a lot of good info for sure.Restrider wrote...
YOU ! HERE! I want to see your most-valuable-post-collection, please
@MB Yeah, I'll do that soonish. Maybe when we reach ~page 2100.
I already said pastebin. I dont actually know how pastebin works though.
You could give it a shot though!
paste your stuff in the big textbox
click submit
spread the link
#50267
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:11
byne wrote...
IronSabbath88 wrote...
So did you all see that response from a BioWare dev that all the writers are going to be involved with the next DLC?
It's called a Citadel DLC... we DO end up at the Citadel at the end of the game.. this could be very interesting.
I wonder if the Citadel DLC will include the cut Citadel quest with Xen where she accuses Tali of sleeping with Shepard.
What...?
#50268
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:11
Stopped reading after "no more SP DLC." We already know they have more...badmojo88 wrote...
ok heres my point, all this drama about IT, now 'what if' just bare with me 'what if' they add nothing more after omega but multi-player packs?
I'll just use my new favourite Rif line, because it's f***ing hilarious!
Stop screwing up while accusing other people of screwing up. That last shred of credibility is breaking FTL trying to get away from you.
- Rifneno
#50269
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:11
masster blaster wrote...
Oh and now there is a thread that say " Bow before the Catalyst." I think that person is just trolling, but if he , or she is for real, then mother of God.... Bioware you did it.
Go take a look, you'll love it!
Trust me.
#50270
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:12
http://social.biowar...ndex/11773629/1GhostShadow115 wrote...
byne wrote...
IronSabbath88 wrote...
So did you all see that response from a BioWare dev that all the writers are going to be involved with the next DLC?
It's called a Citadel DLC... we DO end up at the Citadel at the end of the game.. this could be very interesting.
I wonder if the Citadel DLC will include the cut Citadel quest with Xen where she accuses Tali of sleeping with Shepard.
What...?
#50271
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:13
Guest_SwobyJ_*
badmojo88 wrote...
ok heres my point, all this drama about IT, now 'what if' just bare with me 'what if' they add nothing more after omega but multi-player packs? considering what happened with DA2 its not a far reach either. You must keep in mind this is a game dictated by marketing guidelines, so even IF i.t. was real it might not get put in the game by the time bioware would be forced to move on by EA, and theres the chance IT is just a prayer from disappointed players. Hell I know i was let down, but I dont attack people about it. Just by questioning IT at all ive been attack on every post. People say 'give me proof lets see bioware deny IT' then they dismiss the proof, heres the catch IT itself has no proof, no open declaration by bioware that it is so, and sadly IT people, the burden of proof is on you not the people who doubt. proclaiming something is doesnt make it so.
Oh boy.
#50272
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:14
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Any ideas on where to post it?Restrider wrote...
YOU ! HERE! I want to see your most-valuable-post-collection, please
The IT group?
AND I WAS SERIOUS ABOUT THOSE THIRTY FIVE ENTRIES
YOU OWE ME, SONNY!
*shakes fist*
#50273
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:15
badmojo88 wrote...
ok heres my point, all this drama about IT, now 'what if' just bare with me 'what if' they add nothing more after omega but multi-player packs? considering what happened with DA2 its not a far reach either. You must keep in mind this is a game dictated by marketing guidelines, so even IF i.t. was real it might not get put in the game by the time bioware would be forced to move on by EA, and theres the chance IT is just a prayer from disappointed players. Hell I know i was let down, but I dont attack people about it. Just by questioning IT at all ive been attack on every post. People say 'give me proof lets see bioware deny IT' then they dismiss the proof, heres the catch IT itself has no proof, no open declaration by bioware that it is so, and sadly IT people, the burden of proof is on you not the people who doubt. proclaiming something is doesnt make it so.
You didnt question IT. You came in and claimed that BioWare has flat out denied it. Those are two different things. Question it if you want, but dont say with such certainty things that are not true.
And reveal or not, I still think IT was very likely intended. I've never said a reveal was even needed. One would be nice I guess, but I'm not gonna freak out if I dont get one.
And even if BioWare does at some point come out and just straight up deny IT, then oh well. Its not like I'll be devastated emotionally or anything. I'll just think "It really looked like it was what they intended, but I guess not." and I'll move on.
#50274
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:15
Awesome thanks.IronSabbath88 wrote...
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/323/index/12486978/112#15028852
TOP!

Cookie if you see what I did there.
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 24 novembre 2012 - 12:16 .
#50275
Posté 24 novembre 2012 - 12:15
badmojo88 wrote...
ok heres my point, all this drama about IT, now 'what if' just bare with me 'what if' they add nothing more after omega but multi-player packs? considering what happened with DA2 its not a far reach either. You must keep in mind this is a game dictated by marketing guidelines, so even IF i.t. was real it might not get put in the game by the time bioware would be forced to move on by EA, and theres the chance IT is just a prayer from disappointed players. Hell I know i was let down, but I dont attack people about it. Just by questioning IT at all ive been attack on every post. People say 'give me proof lets see bioware deny IT' then they dismiss the proof, heres the catch IT itself has no proof, no open declaration by bioware that it is so, and sadly IT people, the burden of proof is on you not the people who doubt. proclaiming something is doesnt make it so.
IT has no absolute proof but it has evidence, a whole page of it, which you apparently ignored on your way to troll this thread.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





