masster blaster wrote...
Hanar I mean I ment he sound just like Harbinger.
Harbinger in ME2 was always mysterious. Never showing his true face until the end. He was always rather planning ahead, but failed due to Shepard's squad, the Normandy, help he/she got, and him/herself. Harbinger is introduce as " Who the hell is this guy" at the end of ME2. You know that he is a Reaper at the end, or did you not catch on. I didn't until they showed us that he was a Reaper.
I already figured out that Harbinger was a reaper himself rather fast. It was kinda obvious the way he talked.
Also we know Harbinger is the oldest Reaper/ first. Check.
True.
We know that he is leading the attack on Earth. Check.
Well, leading? That's not specifically said. He is there though.
We know that somebody has been into Shepard's mind because there is no way in hell a Reaper, or Harbinger would just take the form of a random child that looks like the 1 that died on Earth.
And here is where you are wrong and go into speculation-mode.
The Catalyst clearly says he's not a reaper, he's an AI ruling over the reapers. He created the reapers. He also created Harbinger. Big difference.
To believe otherwise is to flatout deny everything the Catalyst says. You can believe that the Catalyst is lying, sure, but I have no reason to believe the Catalyst is flatout lying. Maybe a double-agenda, sure, but he does not seem to be the type to flatout lie.
It's also rather unlikely that the Catalyst would tell the exact same lies as the Leviathans, as they are currently completely unrelated to each other. So the only way to explain why the Catalyst says the exact same things as the Leviathans is to accept that they're both telling the truth.
We also know that Harbinger wanted Shepard's mind. Hence what Control could really mean. You do loose your body, but your mind is Harbinger now. Yes Hanar EC, but just shut up and listen.
The EC indeed shows Shepard is not Harbinger, he is the new Catalyst. Big difference.
Harbinger talks about Shepard to the other Reapers.
Harbinger in arrival ( Yes Hanar but Arrival is dlc, and yes but clamp up) wants Shepard alive. He had this 1 chance to kill Shepard right there, but didn't. Makes no sense unless he wanted to Indoctrinate Shepard. Also it appers that Harbinger is talking in Shepard's mind.
And how could he have killed Shepard there? The harbinger we saw was a HOLOGRAM. Holograms can't kill my friend.

Or are you talking about the final mission on earth? Well, Harbinger did just shoot Shepard and Shepard does lie unconcious on the ground. Maybe Harbinger, being the overconfident reaper that he is, just assumed he succesfull killed Shepard and moved on. That seems like the most reasonable explanation to me with the least amount of assumptions to be made.
If you notice while playing it. Harbinger is trash talking to Shepard, but when Shepard can't take it anymore, he/she passes out. Then you see Kenson being assumed direct Controled by Harbinger.
You can hear her voice, but a mixture of Harbingers voice. Now take the Catalyst for example. The voice of the child, and both Male, and fem Shepard's voices. If Bioware had Harbinger's voice actor speak, don't you think that would give IT away. Also in arrival, it is proven that Shepard can have visons, so if you take the EC epilogue for example, it's all a vison.
But when you have to explain why Shepard would get a vision in the High EMS Destroy ending, where Shepard supossedly breaks free from the indoctrination. It doesn't add up.
Now again your going to say( Hello Dlc), but you forget that the ending is made up of Shepard's memeorys. Even though Shepard never did the dlc's, she/he was suppost to.
That is absolutely nonsense. If Shepard didn't do the DLCs, he didn't do it. Period. The narrative acknowledges that Shepard didn't do the DLC and the narrative adapts, telling us that other squads instead did the job.
In a sense the dlc actually help explain the ending's, yet people like you write them off as ( well since they are not on the disk/ it's optinal to get it.." Ya I get it, but Bioware really wanted you to play them. If you notice the ending*, Cerberus, Kai Leng, Sanders, and so much more make no sense, unless you played the dlc's, read the comics, and the novals.
You get a better background in ME3.
Yes, you get a better background of the story if you've played the DLC, but that's about it. The DLC are still OPTIONAL and the game narratives changes if you didn't do the DLCs. That's just a fact.