80611 réponses à ce sujet

[estebanus]

Restrider wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

I always forget that a lot of fighters even have 2 seats...

The newest versions have 0 seats...

You mean UAVs, right? 

[Rifneno]

Restrider wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

I always forget that a lot of fighters even have 2 seats...

The newest versions have 0 seats...

UAVs?

[masster blaster]

13 more pages to go!

[Restrider]

estebanus wrote...

Restrider wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

I always forget that a lot of fighters even have 2 seats...

The newest versions have 0 seats...

You mean UAVs, right? 

I suppose with UAVs you mean drones? Well, yeah... I think it is save to say that these will have/already have a major role in using your air supperiority.
Edit: LOL urbandictionary.com lists under UAV = urban assault vehicle among others 

Modifié par Restrider, 02 décembre 2012 - 11:26 .

[estebanus]

Restrider wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Restrider wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

I always forget that a lot of fighters even have 2 seats...

The newest versions have 0 seats...

You mean UAVs, right? 

I suppose with UAVs you mean drones? Well, yeah... I think it is save to say that these will have/already have a major role in using your air supperiority.

Unmanned aerial vehicles, right. Although, they aren't really fighter jets, I'd say. They're pretty much a clas o their own.

[Dwailing]

estebanus wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

Well, I think I'm going to give Slender another go and hopefully not fear quit BEFORE THE FRAKKING SLENDER MAN SHOWS UP.

Oh come on, yer big Jessy! The music doesn't even start until you collect the first page!

I can make it to about two pages before I panic and quit.  And Slender will have to wait since I'm going to play a match with paxx.

[Dwailing]

Also, speaking of MP, I can confirm that I did, in fact, name my Batarian Brawler, "Larry."

[Rifneno]

Restrider wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Restrider wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

I always forget that a lot of fighters even have 2 seats...

The newest versions have 0 seats...

You mean UAVs, right? 

I suppose with UAVs you mean drones? Well, yeah... I think it is save to say that these will have/already have a major role in using your air supperiority.

(U)nmanned (A)erial (V)ehicle.  And no, not really.  The best air superiority fighter in the world (F-22) is manned, as is all the next generation planes that governments haven't kept secret.

[estebanus]

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

You forget your more of a target in a car that makes a hell of a lot of sounds.

Plus " would destroy the car with one artillery or RPG shot. Boom. End of distraction." Ya um that's a reason why i say screw cars. I have a better cahnceat running.

Your enemy can't see you in your car when you're in the city. In order to use i as an distraction, you'll have to get out of the city, towards your enemy.

So they can see me on foot, but not in a car?

Yes. They can see you when you're on foot because you'd have to drive your car out of the city and towards them in order to create a distraction. And when you then step out of the car, you're completely at the mercy of their snipers.

Any they can still snipe you in the car, and if they have heat sekers, ya either way your screwed, unless on foot you mask your self with mud, and boom your good to go.

Yes, but if you'd decide to run away with your car, you wouldn't even be heading in their direction, would you? You'd go the total opposite one, meaning you wouldn't even be near them! You're in a city! They can't hit you in there! Not yet, any way.

[Rifneno]

Dwailing wrote...

Also, speaking of MP, I can confirm that I did, in fact, name my Batarian Brawler, "Larry."

I named my batarian "Taint" and gave him hot pint armor.

**** batarians.

[byne]

Rifneno wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

Also, speaking of MP, I can confirm that I did, in fact, name my Batarian Brawler, "Larry."

I named my batarian "Taint" and gave him hot pint armor.

**** batarians.

You didnt even give him a cold pint?

You monster.

[masster blaster]

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

You forget your more of a target in a car that makes a hell of a lot of sounds.

Plus " would destroy the car with one artillery or RPG shot. Boom. End of distraction." Ya um that's a reason why i say screw cars. I have a better cahnceat running.

Your enemy can't see you in your car when you're in the city. In order to use i as an distraction, you'll have to get out of the city, towards your enemy.

So they can see me on foot, but not in a car?

Yes. They can see you when you're on foot because you'd have to drive your car out of the city and towards them in order to create a distraction. And when you then step out of the car, you're completely at the mercy of their snipers.

Any they can still snipe you in the car, and if they have heat sekers, ya either way your screwed, unless on foot you mask your self with mud, and boom your good to go.

Yes, but if you'd decide to run away with your car, you wouldn't even be heading in their direction, would you? You'd go the total opposite one, meaning you wouldn't even be near them! You're in a city! They can't hit you in there! Not yet, any way.

They could have RPG's, and I am sure has hell not going to drive, if they are on the roof tops.

[estebanus]

Rifneno wrote...

Restrider wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Restrider wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

I always forget that a lot of fighters even have 2 seats...

The newest versions have 0 seats...

You mean UAVs, right? 

I suppose with UAVs you mean drones? Well, yeah... I think it is save to say that these will have/already have a major role in using your air supperiority.

(U)nmanned (A)erial (V)ehicle.  And no, not really.  The best air superiority fighter in the world (F-22) is manned, as is all the next generation planes that governments haven't kept secret.

Most UAVs are used for recon, as far as I can recall. Only few of them are used for actual combat.

[Rifneno]

estebanus wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

Restrider wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Restrider wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

I always forget that a lot of fighters even have 2 seats...

The newest versions have 0 seats...

You mean UAVs, right? 

I suppose with UAVs you mean drones? Well, yeah... I think it is save to say that these will have/already have a major role in using your air supperiority.

(U)nmanned (A)erial (V)ehicle.  And no, not really.  The best air superiority fighter in the world (F-22) is manned, as is all the next generation planes that governments haven't kept secret.

Most UAVs are used for recon, as far as I can recall. Only few of them are used for actual combat.

Yeah.  If the Aurora is real, that's the best example.  Only place I've seen combat UAVs was in video games.

[Rifneno]

"Miranda later sends a message to Shepard to meet her in a private room on the Citadel. Once Shepard arrives, Miranda asks them for control of Alliance resources, but refuses to reveal the reason for it. Shepard can refuse, at which Miranda leaves immediately.

Should Shepard give Miranda the resources, she confesses her guilt for wanting to implant a control-chip into Shepard's brain during their reconstruction, as that time she felt Shepard was a complete unknown. Shepard can comfort her saying that it was Miranda who brought them back to life, regardless of her opinions about them back then and tells her not to dwell on the past."

Wikia quote. Just for giggles, I denied Miranda the resources this time. She was taken aback but continued the conversation as normal, going right into the "sorry about wanting a control chip" lamenting. So much for the wikia being reliable with non-speculative stuff.

[BatmanTurian]

Dwailing wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

Man, I just can't seem to play Slender. I fear quit after about 30 seconds due to terror. Man, I miss the days when Slender had no pause button. It would make it so much easier for me to force myself through it.

The really scary thing about slender is the music. That's what really creepts me out.

Bingo.  Of course, then you unlock Marble Hornets mode, and you realize that the music isn't the only reason you were creeped out.... 

It's far less scary when you unlock 20$ mode on daylight. In fact, it's funny as hell.

[estebanus]

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

You forget your more of a target in a car that makes a hell of a lot of sounds.

Plus " would destroy the car with one artillery or RPG shot. Boom. End of distraction." Ya um that's a reason why i say screw cars. I have a better cahnceat running.

Your enemy can't see you in your car when you're in the city. In order to use i as an distraction, you'll have to get out of the city, towards your enemy.

So they can see me on foot, but not in a car?

Yes. They can see you when you're on foot because you'd have to drive your car out of the city and towards them in order to create a distraction. And when you then step out of the car, you're completely at the mercy of their snipers.

Any they can still snipe you in the car, and if they have heat sekers, ya either way your screwed, unless on foot you mask your self with mud, and boom your good to go.

Yes, but if you'd decide to run away with your car, you wouldn't even be heading in their direction, would you? You'd go the total opposite one, meaning you wouldn't even be near them! You're in a city! They can't hit you in there! Not yet, any way.

They could have RPG's, and I am sure has hell not going to drive, if they are on the roof tops.

Masster, are you being serious? Or are you trying to troll me?

They.re not in the city. They're outside the city, marching on it. If you want to use your car as a distraction(However nonsensical that is), you've gotta get outta the city, on a road that leads straight to their army. Not only is ther no guarantee for it to have the wanted effect, but if the enmy army sees a car driving towards them, they'll shell it. If they see a person getting out of the car before sending it down towards them, they'll see that person as a hostile, and will most likely terminate said person with snipers or artillery. 

Now, if you use your car to flee, the only thing you'd be in danger from are stray shots and incoming debris, which would be much more dangerous if you were on foot. You're nowhere near the enemy yet. You're going in the opposite direction. You have a vehicle which is transporting you in the opposite direction more swiftly than you could on foot. You're relatively safe. 

Now, do you understand what I'm saying, Masster?

[byne]

Rifneno wrote...

estebanus wrote...


Most UAVs are used for recon, as far as I can recall. Only few of them are used for actual combat.

Yeah.  If the Aurora is real, that's the best example.  Only place I've seen combat UAVs was in video games.

Do the drones used by the military not count?

Also, theres a drone called the Reaper. Which is nice.

Modifié par byne, 02 décembre 2012 - 11:38 .

[estebanus]

Rifneno wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

Restrider wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Restrider wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

I always forget that a lot of fighters even have 2 seats...

The newest versions have 0 seats...

You mean UAVs, right? 

I suppose with UAVs you mean drones? Well, yeah... I think it is save to say that these will have/already have a major role in using your air supperiority.

(U)nmanned (A)erial (V)ehicle.  And no, not really.  The best air superiority fighter in the world (F-22) is manned, as is all the next generation planes that governments haven't kept secret.

Most UAVs are used for recon, as far as I can recall. Only few of them are used for actual combat.

Yeah.  If the Aurora is real, that's the best example.  Only place I've seen combat UAVs was in video games.

They are in fact used from time to time for assassinations of taliban leaders, but very seldom. Today's combat drones have problems with the targeting of enemy locations, meaning that their inccuracy could cost the lives of civilians. I've read some newspaper articles about that happening, as a matter of fact.

[estebanus]

byne wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

estebanus wrote...


Most UAVs are used for recon, as far as I can recall. Only few of them are used for actual combat.

Yeah.  If the Aurora is real, that's the best example.  Only place I've seen combat UAVs was in video games.

Do the drones used by the military not count?

Also, theres a drone called the Reaper. Which is nice.

...Military drones are the ones we're talking about, I think.

Modifié par estebanus, 02 décembre 2012 - 11:42 .

[masster blaster]

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

You forget your more of a target in a car that makes a hell of a lot of sounds.

Plus " would destroy the car with one artillery or RPG shot. Boom. End of distraction." Ya um that's a reason why i say screw cars. I have a better cahnceat running.

Your enemy can't see you in your car when you're in the city. In order to use i as an distraction, you'll have to get out of the city, towards your enemy.

So they can see me on foot, but not in a car?

Yes. They can see you when you're on foot because you'd have to drive your car out of the city and towards them in order to create a distraction. And when you then step out of the car, you're completely at the mercy of their snipers.

Any they can still snipe you in the car, and if they have heat sekers, ya either way your screwed, unless on foot you mask your self with mud, and boom your good to go.

Yes, but if you'd decide to run away with your car, you wouldn't even be heading in their direction, would you? You'd go the total opposite one, meaning you wouldn't even be near them! You're in a city! They can't hit you in there! Not yet, any way.

They could have RPG's, and I am sure has hell not going to drive, if they are on the roof tops.

Masster, are you being serious? Or are you trying to troll me?

They.re not in the city. They're outside the city, marching on it. If you want to use your car as a distraction(However nonsensical that is), you've gotta get outta the city, on a road that leads straight to their army. Not only is ther no guarantee for it to have the wanted effect, but if the enmy army sees a car driving towards them, they'll shell it. If they see a person getting out of the car before sending it down towards them, they'll see that person as a hostile, and will most likely terminate said person with snipers or artillery. 

Now, if you use your car to flee, the only thing you'd be in danger from are stray shots and incoming debris, which would be much more dangerous if you were on foot. You're nowhere near the enemy yet. You're going in the opposite direction. You have a vehicle which is transporting you in the opposite direction more swiftly than you could on foot. You're relatively safe. 

Now, do you understand what I'm saying, Masster?

Yes, but if the way is blocked by a debry of rubble, then what. An artiliary shell randomly fires and hit's a top of a building. You are driving away from the city, and boom debries falls, and blocks the road. What then?

[byne]

estebanus wrote...

They are in fact used from time to time for assassinations of taliban leaders, but very seldom. Today's combat drones have problems with the targeting of enemy locations, meaning that their inccuracy could cost the lives of civilians. I've read some newspaper articles about that happening, as a matter of fact.

It actually happens a whole lot.

They've tried to downplay the whole 'killing civilians' thing by claiming that anyone of fighting age in the area is a militant until proven innocent.

Conveniently, with that kind of logic, we kill almost no civilians! <_<

[Restrider]

Rifneno wrote...

Restrider wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Restrider wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

I always forget that a lot of fighters even have 2 seats...

The newest versions have 0 seats...

You mean UAVs, right? 

I suppose with UAVs you mean drones? Well, yeah... I think it is save to say that these will have/already have a major role in using your air supperiority.

(U)nmanned (A)erial (V)ehicle.  And no, not really.  The best air superiority fighter in the world (F-22) is manned, as is all the next generation planes that governments haven't kept secret.

You did not get the point. UAVs are the best to use air superiority and not to gain it.
Furthermore I believe it is only a matter of time till someone is going to develop an unmanned air-to-air jet. Let's face it, the pilot limits the maneuverability of a jet (too high g forces etc.).

[byne]

estebanus wrote...

byne wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

estebanus wrote...


Most UAVs are used for recon, as far as I can recall. Only few of them are used for actual combat.

Yeah.  If the Aurora is real, that's the best example.  Only place I've seen combat UAVs was in video games.

Do the drones used by the military not count?

Also, theres a drone called the Reaper. Which is nice.

...Military drones are the ones we're talking about, I think.

Right, thats what I thought, but then Rif said he'd only seen them in video games.

[byne]

masster blaster wrote...

Yes, but if the way is blocked by a debry of rubble, then what. An artiliary shell randomly fires and hit's a top of a building. You are driving away from the city, and boom debries falls, and blocks the road. What then?

Probably go to a different road. Most cities have more than one road.