Ce sujet est fermé
Well, it is just my opinion. I think I had the same as you before the DLC Extended Ending but, after it, I cannot see the ending in that way because refuse would not have its place, you can really save the Galaxy but you prefer refusing and just die... I see that like you refuse Reapers help at any cost and you die like in the rest of the cycles, or you accept their help and who knows what will happened, if you take the endings literally you have your response. I do not do that and I think there is something more behind them (maybe grades of indoctrination such as if you choose control you are totally indoctrinated, etc). And I chose Destroy although I am not satisfied with the decision.Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
I disagree with Destroy beeing a Reaper choice. The Catalyst is clearly trying to lead you away from the choice and also he dosent say Destroy is a solution when he introduces it, unlike the other two which he refer to as solutions. I would even say he dosent so much introduce it as simply acknowledge the choice's existence.
But most importantly is the meaning, the thought behind Destroy. It is victory through sacrifice, a theme whih has been repeated multiple times throughout the game. We are many times told that in this war you cannot save everyone.
But maybe most importantly is how Indoctrination works. It works by aligning the victims goals and beliefs with the Reapers, but in Destroy Shepard is not aligning with them in any way. He has no desire to control them for his own gain, he will not accept their solution of synthesis. He is doing what he always came to do, destroying them. There is no change of motivation, Shepard is firmly established in the belief that the Reapers have to die.
I have to say I have not played Leviathan DLC yet, so I do not know if that could change my own vision.
Modifié par Lat2oo5, 03 décembre 2012 - 07:50 .
Retour en haut
