401 Kill wrote...
"IT is just as valid as literal." -Chris Preistly
Who's not listening to Bioware hmm????
Modifié par TheProtheans, 04 décembre 2012 - 01:27 .
TheProtheans wrote...
I will come back to tomorrow, but I'm not sure there is any point as you don't even listen to Bioware.
I have a very important question.TheProtheans wrote...
I have a very important question.
Why does everyone here feel the need to recite points that were brought up months ago in a 2300 page long thread?
TheProtheans wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
"IT is just as valid as literal." -Chris Preistly
Who's not listening to Bioware hmm????
It's not about if it is a theory or not.
And really that is marketing decision by Bioware to get you to buy DLC.
Quite simple, I spend some time reading here, and 1-3 times a week someone like you shows up, says he/she knows something better, everything about, it's all just sh*t and so on without reading anything and ... people here answer/react.TheProtheans wrote...
I have a very important question.
Why does everyone here feel the need to recite points that were brought up months ago in a 2300 page long thread?
Charlieblacko wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
No kidding, but nobody ever seems to bother. I think it's a prequisite that you have to be inquisitive, logical, intuitive, open-minded, and fairly analytical to entertain our literary theory.
Before I came across IT, which I think was probably only an hour after completing ME3 when it was first released. I'd of easily of said Bioware screwed us over but once coming across it with the ammount of evidence stacked behind it? It seems ridiculous not to believe that IT isn't what bioware intended.. Its just so perfect. (This is coming from someone who was infact indoctrinated by the ending.... Went for control)
No, it's all about the theory. They may or may not have a reveal, and that really doesn't affect it. You're just trying to prove you are right when the fact is, without conformation from Bioware, you can't.TheProtheans wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
"IT is just as valid as literal." -Chris Preistly
Who's not listening to Bioware hmm????
It's not about if it is a theory or not.
And really that is marketing decision by Bioware to get you to buy DLC.
401 Kill wrote...
I have a very important question.TheProtheans wrote...
I have a very important question.
Why does everyone here feel the need to recite points that were brought up months ago in a 2300 page long thread?
Why do you feel the need to come in here and state that IT is delusional using the same troll arguments brought up months ago in an over 6000 page topic? (This is Mk III after all)
TheProtheans wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
"IT is just as valid as literal." -Chris Preistly
Who's not listening to Bioware hmm????
It's not about if it is a theory or not.
And really that is marketing decision by Bioware to get you to buy DLC.
>Goes back to the time Jessica told me EDI was not made of Reaper Tech
Modifié par BatmanTurian, 04 décembre 2012 - 01:30 .
401 Kill wrote...
"IT is just as valid as literal." -Chris Preistly
Who's not listening to Bioware hmm????
BatmanTurian wrote...
Charlieblacko wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
No kidding, but nobody ever seems to bother. I think it's a prequisite that you have to be inquisitive, logical, intuitive, open-minded, and fairly analytical to entertain our literary theory.
Before I came across IT, which I think was probably only an hour after completing ME3 when it was first released. I'd of easily of said Bioware screwed us over but once coming across it with the ammount of evidence stacked behind it? It seems ridiculous not to believe that IT isn't what bioware intended.. Its just so perfect. (This is coming from someone who was infact indoctrinated by the ending.... Went for control)
I hear ya'.
By contrast, I know three people in this thread who knew it was an indoctrination attempt before even coming here (during the game even): Byne, Doomsday, and me. There are probably others. Don't feel offended if I don't list you guys.
BatmanTurian wrote...
Charlieblacko wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
No kidding, but nobody ever seems to bother. I think it's a prequisite that you have to be inquisitive, logical, intuitive, open-minded, and fairly analytical to entertain our literary theory.
Before I came across IT, which I think was probably only an hour after completing ME3 when it was first released. I'd of easily of said Bioware screwed us over but once coming across it with the ammount of evidence stacked behind it? It seems ridiculous not to believe that IT isn't what bioware intended.. Its just so perfect. (This is coming from someone who was infact indoctrinated by the ending.... Went for control)
I hear ya'.
By contrast, I know three people in this thread who knew it was an indoctrination attempt before even coming here (during the game even): Byne, Doomsday, and me. There are probably others. Don't feel offended if I don't list you guys.
TheProtheans wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
I have a very important question.TheProtheans wrote...
I have a very important question.
Why does everyone here feel the need to recite points that were brought up months ago in a 2300 page long thread?
Why do you feel the need to come in here and state that IT is delusional using the same troll arguments brought up months ago in an over 6000 page topic? (This is Mk III after all)
Because this thread doesn't stop.
You think after MK II they would have stopped, but why do you continue posting the same points everyday?
401 Kill wrote...
No, it's all about the theory. They may or may not have a reveal, and that really doesn't affect it. You're just trying to prove you are right when the fact is, without conformation from Bioware, you can't.TheProtheans wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
"IT is just as valid as literal." -Chris Preistly
Who's not listening to Bioware hmm????
It's not about if it is a theory or not.
And really that is marketing decision by Bioware to get you to buy DLC.
Golferguy758 wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
Charlieblacko wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
No kidding, but nobody ever seems to bother. I think it's a prequisite that you have to be inquisitive, logical, intuitive, open-minded, and fairly analytical to entertain our literary theory.
Before I came across IT, which I think was probably only an hour after completing ME3 when it was first released. I'd of easily of said Bioware screwed us over but once coming across it with the ammount of evidence stacked behind it? It seems ridiculous not to believe that IT isn't what bioware intended.. Its just so perfect. (This is coming from someone who was infact indoctrinated by the ending.... Went for control)
I hear ya'.
By contrast, I know three people in this thread who knew it was an indoctrination attempt before even coming here (during the game even): Byne, Doomsday, and me. There are probably others. Don't feel offended if I don't list you guys.
Hater
dreamgazer wrote...
For the love of gravy, nobody is a "deluded cultist".
BatmanTurian wrote...
By contrast, I know three people in this thread who knew it was an indoctrination attempt before even coming here (during the game even): Byne, Doomsday, and me. There are probably others. Don't feel offended if I don't list you guys.
Of course it won't stop, it is completely valid. There is no reason for it to stop. Are you honestly trying to stop this thread? Why? What are you even doing here in the first place, if you don't agree with IT, then DONT BOTHER WITH IT, my god.TheProtheans wrote...
Because this thread doesn't stop.401 Kill wrote...
I have a very important question.TheProtheans wrote...
I have a very important question.
Why does everyone here feel the need to recite points that were brought up months ago in a 2300 page long thread?
Why do you feel the need to come in here and state that IT is delusional using the same troll arguments brought up months ago in an over 6000 page topic? (This is Mk III after all)
You think after MK II they would have stopped, but why do you continue posting the same points everyday?
TheProtheans wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
No, it's all about the theory. They may or may not have a reveal, and that really doesn't affect it. You're just trying to prove you are right when the fact is, without conformation from Bioware, you can't.TheProtheans wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
"IT is just as valid as literal." -Chris Preistly
Who's not listening to Bioware hmm????
It's not about if it is a theory or not.
And really that is marketing decision by Bioware to get you to buy DLC.
You could write up any garbage as long as it didn't then retcon anything and it would still be a theory.
I think it is delusional you expect it to be more than that.
Guest_magnetite_*
BatmanTurian wrote...
Because we are interested. We discover new things by discussion and seeing things from other points of view. We think of it as a puzzle made to be completed by a group. Also, there is a social aspect to it since we are friends and, you know, humans socialize. It's what we do, you know, on a discussion board about story discussion.
This is like asking us why we are discussing how to train dogs on a pet forum.
BatmanTurian wrote...
TheProtheans wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
No, it's all about the theory. They may or may not have a reveal, and that really doesn't affect it. You're just trying to prove you are right when the fact is, without conformation from Bioware, you can't.TheProtheans wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
"IT is just as valid as literal." -Chris Preistly
Who's not listening to Bioware hmm????
It's not about if it is a theory or not.
And really that is marketing decision by Bioware to get you to buy DLC.
You could write up any garbage as long as it didn't then retcon anything and it would still be a theory.
I think it is delusional you expect it to be more than that.
You could say the same about the Control and Synthesis support threads.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut