Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#5826
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:22
I could say I practice my lines, but when I get on the stage I repet my lines over and over, until I realize crap I messed up ,and just leave it at that.
#5827
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:24
As said it ceases if you load a savegame and is only after the FOB.Lokanaiya wrote...
For the head bob mechanic in London, I think it's actually that it switches on and off each playthrough you do. I've done London three times on my Paragon, and the first and last both had normal crosshairs while the second had the moving ones. Also of note, the camera in the weapon mod screen on my second playthrough was wobbling while it wasn't on my first and third.
And am I the only one who names their N7 characters operative-style codenames? For instance, my Shadow is always called Obsidian and my Paladin is called Bulwark.
In any case I transitioned from the FOB to the level afterwards it's there.
For the names.. I don't think you're the only one but certainly one of the few. My Paladin is called Mr Operator and sporting Cerberus colors
#5828
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:29
Edit: I'll be back in an hour
Modifié par Chriz Tah Fah, 06 août 2012 - 04:29 .
#5829
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:31
#5830
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:32
And granted there was only one questioned I like, that was from somebody else, they try to pick the safe route, instead of answering our question with no oh maybe this. No more BS Bioware just tell us, or put slowly tell us in the dlc for sp, and maybe MP.
#5831
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:37
Maybe it's bugged like the face in the third dream which is inconsistent.Lokanaiya wrote...
Megumi, I played from right before destroying the Hades Cannon each time, so I did go through the FOB to get there. I don't think I chose any different dialogue options when I went through each time, either.
#5832
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:40
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Maybe it's bugged like the face in the third dream which is inconsistent.Lokanaiya wrote...
Megumi, I played from right before destroying the Hades Cannon each time, so I did go through the FOB to get there. I don't think I chose any different dialogue options when I went through each time, either.
Bug as in...the facial expression should change? If so, how do we know what 'should' be -- except for an 'it would make sense' argument? Game files?
Modifié par MaximizedAction, 06 août 2012 - 04:44 .
#5833
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:43
#5834
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:44
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Maybe it's bugged like the face in the third dream which is inconsistent.Lokanaiya wrote...
Megumi, I played from right before destroying the Hades Cannon each time, so I did go through the FOB to get there. I don't think I chose any different dialogue options when I went through each time, either.
What? I've never had my face change in the game. There have been plenty of tiny conversation errors that annoy me but never having my face change. Is it connected to the import face errors? It might explain that cause I always play with the default face after all the news of face import failures...
#5835
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:47
#5836
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:49
As in sometimes Shepard looks distressed, sometimes the expression is normal.MaximizedAction wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Maybe it's bugged like the face in the third dream which is inconsistent.Lokanaiya wrote...
Megumi, I played from right before destroying the Hades Cannon each time, so I did go through the FOB to get there. I don't think I chose any different dialogue options when I went through each time, either.
Bug as in...the facial expression should change? If so, how do we know what 'should' be -- except for an 'it would make sense' argument? Game files?
With enough tries when loading before starting the attack you can see it's quite random.
#5837
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:54
Anyways, I was just pointing out something that I found to not be true and that should probably be checked. We should try to have our data be as accurate as possible.
#5838
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:58
No, it's random.Lokanaiya wrote...
Didn't someone test the dream one a lot and found that no matter what happens or what you say, the face thing is always expressionless, horrified, expressionless, horrified, etc.? That doesn't seem like a bug to me.
Modifié par MegumiAzusa, 06 août 2012 - 04:58 .
#5839
Posté 06 août 2012 - 04:59
#5840
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:00
#5841
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:02
#5842
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:06
#5843
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:08
MegumiAzusa wrote...
One point is interesting. It's hinted that the methods of indoctrination are evolving. Evolution and comments on the Citadel in ME1 show that humans are unaffected at first and can only do rudimentary and forced tasks.
Ben was in full control of himself up to the point Eva shoots the relic where he goes into a rampage and kills her, but assumes control again afterwards, he even incapacitates Desolas.
In ME1 my example would be how it's commented that new species first don't really mind the Consort but later some feel that they are compelled to work with her.
Adding to that what is presumed what the relics function is: a device to devolve the ones who touch it to be easier controlled, which doesn't fit 100% with the indoctrination methods we know. It seems they have first to analyze specimen to devise a form of indoctrination that targets the species without or with less degradation. From that I would say it's one thing that makes this theory even more valid, as Humans are still quite new for them they maybe didn't devise a perfect way to indoctrinate yet, which could lead to the struggle at the end.
#5844
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:08
#5845
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:19
MegumiAzusa wrote...
No one got any thoughts about that?MegumiAzusa wrote...
One point is interesting. It's hinted that the methods of indoctrination are evolving. Evolution and comments on the Citadel in ME1 show that humans are unaffected at first and can only do rudimentary and forced tasks.
Ben was in full control of himself up to the point Eva shoots the relic where he goes into a rampage and kills her, but assumes control again afterwards, he even incapacitates Desolas.
In ME1 my example would be how it's commented that new species first don't really mind the Consort but later some feel that they are compelled to work with her.
Adding to that what is presumed what the relics function is: a device to devolve the ones who touch it to be easier controlled, which doesn't fit 100% with the indoctrination methods we know. It seems they have first to analyze specimen to devise a form of indoctrination that targets the species without or with less degradation. From that I would say it's one thing that makes this theory even more valid, as Humans are still quite new for them they maybe didn't devise a perfect way to indoctrinate yet, which could lead to the struggle at the end.
I posted a couple days ago I think there are levels of indoctrination.
In direct proximity of a Reaper your thought processes are slowly changed (Saren pre-implants).
And when you get in direct contact with Reaper tech or let yourself get implanted with it, it let's the Reapers gain control of your body. Like a computer virus.
Edit: a virus that evolves and adapts to the host.
Modifié par Home run MF, 06 août 2012 - 05:22 .
#5846
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:24
Could the beings of light be the creators of the Catalyst, which explains why the Catalyst appears the way he is aside from looking like the child?
#5847
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:26
#5848
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:27
Lokanaiya wrote...
Blaster, we really should work on getting all of our evidence in one place and organized. The longer we wait the more there will be to catalogue. : /
What you speak of is already in progress. It actually I believe is almost done. Be patient.
#5849
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:30
#5850
Posté 06 août 2012 - 05:30
EpyonX3 wrote...
So, the catalyst says that the Civilization that created him gave the reapers form. What if that include the Catalyst?
Could the beings of light be the creators of the Catalyst, which explains why the Catalyst appears the way he is aside from looking like the child?
I actually have an idea on why his appearance is blue glowy. We already figured why he takes the form of the child, but not the glowy part. I think I figured it out. Check out the Evidence entry in my signature or in the official thread of WNT and go to the Arrival portion.
Modifié par TJBartlemus, 06 août 2012 - 05:31 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





