There are many Shepherds but only one Shepard. CanonShep.spotlessvoid wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
In itself yes, at least it's no less canon then one who doesn't die.spotlessvoid wrote...
Is a Shepard who stops at me2 canon?
Not a Shepard who dies. One who just skips vme3
Modifié par paxxton, 05 décembre 2012 - 02:16 .
Yes. The darkness (aka religion) must not be breached :3Lokanaiya wrote...
... Maybe we should keep away from religious... well, anything?
But then, I highly expect this post to be ignored as well. *sigh*
Guest_SwobyJ_*
byne wrote...
Considering both sides produced quotes supporting their positions, I'd call the argument a tie.
Though I did get Hanar to admit that the EC cant disprove IT because it is not canon, which is nice.
I am on top, that makes me correct.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
There is your problem. You don't even give people the benefit of doubt anymorebyne wrote...
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
belief in God =/= a religion
I thought you'd know the difference between both.
I understand the difference, it just seemed you were headed in that direction.
Guest_SwobyJ_*
MegumiAzusa wrote...
There is plenty of time before, as you can read from one of the books Kahlee just talking with Reaper-Grayson for maybe a minute causes her to agree with him until a shot from Andersons shotgun breaks it. (whoops spoiled it)SwobyJ wrote...
I think people mistaken Shep canon for Bioware canon.
If your Shepard didn't do Arrival, then of course he didn't do anything in it.
The narrative progression treats things as though you did it, even if the specific details don't.
If Hellish somehow thinks that Arrival is some big point where Shepard starts a dream and all of ME3 is that dream, then I'll have to disagree with him big time.
All Arrival is, imo, is an illustrative DLC. Shep doesn't even need to be indoctrinated there.
Still not doing a DLC is the same, story wise, as not doing a loyalty mission for example. It doesn't matter if it's additional content to the original game or not.SwobyJ wrote...
byne wrote...
Considering both sides produced quotes supporting their positions, I'd call the argument a tie.
Though I did get Hanar to admit that the EC cant disprove IT because it is not canon, which is nice.
I am on top, that makes me correct.
It pretty much is a tie...
To Bioware, anything they make is canon, duh.
But since they make the story presented in very subjective ways depending on the player and what they paid for, there is also no canon.
Different forms really.
Conclusion about Arrival - It 'happened', but they'll allow it not to happen. Story just won't make as much sense for those who chose not to do it though.
Another example is Omega - Omega is gonna be taken back by canon, I'm sure of it. It just makes a lot less sense for it to happen without Shepard, but hey, you're the player, and you have the $$$$ to buy the DLC or not. Bioware isn't gonna automatically invalidate you not buying the DLC, but they're surely going to make the story a bit more confusing if you don't.
Lokanaiya wrote...
... Maybe we should keep away from religious... well, anything?
But then, I highly expect this post to be ignored as well. *sigh*
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Still not doing a DLC is the same, story wise, as not doing a loyalty mission for example. It doesn't matter if it's additional content to the original game or not.SwobyJ wrote...
byne wrote...
Considering both sides produced quotes supporting their positions, I'd call the argument a tie.
Though I did get Hanar to admit that the EC cant disprove IT because it is not canon, which is nice.
I am on top, that makes me correct.
It pretty much is a tie...
To Bioware, anything they make is canon, duh.
But since they make the story presented in very subjective ways depending on the player and what they paid for, there is also no canon.
Different forms really.
Conclusion about Arrival - It 'happened', but they'll allow it not to happen. Story just won't make as much sense for those who chose not to do it though.
Another example is Omega - Omega is gonna be taken back by canon, I'm sure of it. It just makes a lot less sense for it to happen without Shepard, but hey, you're the player, and you have the $$$$ to buy the DLC or not. Bioware isn't gonna automatically invalidate you not buying the DLC, but they're surely going to make the story a bit more confusing if you don't.
Which resulted in attacking a few people without any reason the last few hundred pages. Being annoyed and bored is no excuse.CoolioThane wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
There is your problem. You don't even give people the benefit of doubt anymorebyne wrote...
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
belief in God =/= a religion
I thought you'd know the difference between both.
I understand the difference, it just seemed you were headed in that direction.
There is no problem; we get it a lot on the thread. We're all bored of it.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Which resulted in attacking a few people without any reason the last few hundred pages. Being annoyed and bored is no excuse.CoolioThane wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
There is your problem. You don't even give people the benefit of doubt anymorebyne wrote...
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
belief in God =/= a religion
I thought you'd know the difference between both.
I understand the difference, it just seemed you were headed in that direction.
There is no problem; we get it a lot on the thread. We're all bored of it.
Modifié par CoolioThane, 05 décembre 2012 - 02:22 .
Random people who came here and first thing that happened was they got attacked.spotlessvoid wrote...
And who would that be Megumi?
Please, anything.Home run MF wrote...
Lokanaiya wrote...
... Maybe we should keep away from religious... well, anything?
But then, I highly expect this post to be ignored as well. *sigh*
I've found something funny while digging through files, let me upload it.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Random people who came here and first thing that happened was they got attacked.spotlessvoid wrote...
And who would that be Megumi?
Modifié par CoolioThane, 05 décembre 2012 - 02:23 .
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Random people who came here and first thing that happened was they got attacked.spotlessvoid wrote...
And who would that be Megumi?
You're talking about the ones who came here, attack people and then got a response?MegumiAzusa wrote...
Random people who came here and first thing that happened was they got attacked.spotlessvoid wrote...
And who would that be Megumi?
Guest_SwobyJ_*
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Still not doing a DLC is the same, story wise, as not doing a loyalty mission for example. It doesn't matter if it's additional content to the original game or not.SwobyJ wrote...
byne wrote...
Considering both sides produced quotes supporting their positions, I'd call the argument a tie.
Though I did get Hanar to admit that the EC cant disprove IT because it is not canon, which is nice.
I am on top, that makes me correct.
It pretty much is a tie...
To Bioware, anything they make is canon, duh.
But since they make the story presented in very subjective ways depending on the player and what they paid for, there is also no canon.
Different forms really.
Conclusion about Arrival - It 'happened', but they'll allow it not to happen. Story just won't make as much sense for those who chose not to do it though.
Another example is Omega - Omega is gonna be taken back by canon, I'm sure of it. It just makes a lot less sense for it to happen without Shepard, but hey, you're the player, and you have the $$$$ to buy the DLC or not. Bioware isn't gonna automatically invalidate you not buying the DLC, but they're surely going to make the story a bit more confusing if you don't.
Nope, but the ones who came here, stated some thoughts, got attacked, argued, then later even got apologies. And no I'm too lazy to look through the thread for an example. If you don't remember any instance you are indeed really delusional.hukbum wrote...
You're talking about the ones who came here, attack people and then got a response?MegumiAzusa wrote...
Random people who came here and first thing that happened was they got attacked.spotlessvoid wrote...
And who would that be Megumi?
Modifié par MegumiAzusa, 05 décembre 2012 - 02:29 .
Modifié par 401 Kill, 05 décembre 2012 - 02:28 .
Clicky401 Kill wrote...
Please, anything.Home run MF wrote...
Lokanaiya wrote...
... Maybe we should keep away from religious... well, anything?
But then, I highly expect this post to be ignored as well. *sigh*
I've found something funny while digging through files, let me upload it.
Modifié par Home run MF, 05 décembre 2012 - 02:28 .
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Nope, but the ones who came here, stated some thoughts, got attacked, argued, then later even got apologies. And no I'm too lazy to look through the thread for an example. If you don't remember any instance you are indeed really delusional.hukbum wrote...
You're talking about the ones who came here, attack people and then got a response?MegumiAzusa wrote...
Random people who came here and first thing that happened was they got attacked.spotlessvoid wrote...
And who would that be Megumi?
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
