MegumiAzusa wrote...
Why do people ignore the difference between opt out and the other endings which IT as of now cannot explain?spotlessvoid wrote...
Why do people ignore EDI calling the Collectors synthesis in ME2?
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
Does it matter? Synthesis still isn't the same thing as reaperfication, which we can clearly see in the Synthesis epilogue.
Dunno but the romances in ME3 felt really schematic in general. Like suddenly everybody had a mood to go shopping and dining. And I didn't get a chance to romance anyone because Miranda locked me out.AresKeith wrote...
paxxton wrote...
I remember Patrick Weekes caught off-guard at PAX in April saying that everybody on the Citadel is ok after the Reaper takeover. Yeah, right
Lol I know right, but from what I saw in the Jacob romance in ME3, it looks like they did forget he was an LI
Modifié par paxxton, 05 décembre 2012 - 06:54 .
And you made errors doing so, which I explained, which you ignored.BleedingUranium wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Why do people ignore the difference between opt out and the other endings which IT as of now cannot explain?spotlessvoid wrote...
Why do people ignore EDI calling the Collectors synthesis in ME2?
We have, multiple times. You've ignored it.
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
hukbum wrote...
So what does Shep have to do to make it happen?Heretic_Hanar wrote...
Why do people here keep comparing the Synthesis ending with the reapers turning organics into goo? IT'S NOT THE SAME THING!
Spend some fingernail, or get gooed?
Does it matter? Synthesis still isn't the same thing as reaperfication, which we can clearly see in the Synthesis epilogue.
BleedingUranium wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Why do people ignore the difference between opt out and the other endings which IT as of now cannot explain?spotlessvoid wrote...
Why do people ignore EDI calling the Collectors synthesis in ME2?
We have, multiple times. You've ignored it.
Guest_laecraft_*
spotlessvoid wrote...
Right Hanar, because the guy repeatedly exposed to Reaper tech doesn't make sense getting indoctrinated.
Modifié par laecraft, 05 décembre 2012 - 06:45 .
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Thanks, so an explosion from outside cannot break it but an explosion from inside with less force could. Thus shields protecting from outside are closer to be the right answer. QED.
spotlessvoid wrote...
Otter, you mean the model ships, or did I miss something?
is that what they're calling it these days?BleedingUranium wrote...
I'm sure Kelly Chambers was thrilled with the idea of synthesizing with the Reapers
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Why do people ignore the difference between opt out and the other endings which IT as of now cannot explain?spotlessvoid wrote...
Why do people ignore EDI calling the Collectors synthesis in ME2?
smokingotter1 wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
Otter, you mean the model ships, or did I miss something?
Now I'm confused.
Which I didn't say they were. I said a lesser explosion/force evidently overcame these quantum shields while a bigger force, which was applied over a longer period of time did not.BleedingUranium wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Thanks, so an explosion from outside cannot break it but an explosion from inside with less force could. Thus shields protecting from outside are closer to be the right answer. QED.
No. Quantum shields are not the shields you are looking for.
BleedingUranium wrote...
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
hukbum wrote...
So what does Shep have to do to make it happen?Heretic_Hanar wrote...
Why do people here keep comparing the Synthesis ending with the reapers turning organics into goo? IT'S NOT THE SAME THING!
Spend some fingernail, or get gooed?
Does it matter? Synthesis still isn't the same thing as reaperfication, which we can clearly see in the Synthesis epilogue.
You can't counter IT with stuff that happens between the beam run and the breath scene.
There was one about Benezia's dialogue being similar to ending stuff, and one about how the kid originally looked more like Sheploo.spotlessvoid wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
Otter, you mean the model ships, or did I miss something?
Now I'm confused.
Perhaps you should enlighten me as to.which post of yours got ignored
So it doesn't matter which choice Shep picks as activating the Crucible is the only thing that matters, which makes destroy in the long run equal to synthesis.spotlessvoid wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Why do people ignore the difference between opt out and the other endings which IT as of now cannot explain?spotlessvoid wrote...
Why do people ignore EDI calling the Collectors synthesis in ME2?
Refuse? Bill would suggest it's because you've been beaten into inaction/tricked into not using the crucible.
spotlessvoid wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Why do people ignore the difference between opt out and the other endings which IT as of now cannot explain?spotlessvoid wrote...
Why do people ignore EDI calling the Collectors synthesis in ME2?
Refuse? Bill would suggest it's because you've been beaten into inaction/tricked into not using the crucible.
I guess he was referring to the general state, not individual posts.spotlessvoid wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
Otter, you mean the model ships, or did I miss something?
Now I'm confused.
Perhaps you should enlighten me as to.which post of yours got ignored
spotlessvoid wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
Otter, you mean the model ships, or did I miss something?
Now I'm confused.
Perhaps you should enlighten me as to.which post of yours got ignored
Modifié par spotlessvoid, 05 décembre 2012 - 06:52 .
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
hukbum wrote...
So what does Shep have to do to make it happen?Heretic_Hanar wrote...
Why do people here keep comparing the Synthesis ending with the reapers turning organics into goo? IT'S NOT THE SAME THING!
Spend some fingernail, or get gooed?
Does it matter? Synthesis still isn't the same thing as reaperfication, which we can clearly see in the Synthesis epilogue.
You can't counter IT with stuff that happens between the beam run and the breath scene.
That goes both ways. You can't use IT to counter what happens in the epilogues, because in the IT the epilogues don't happen. You can't use IT logic on the literal epilogues.
This is starting to sound like ME3 was going to be an opportunity to desperately close all the threads. Just to finally finish the story.AresKeith wrote...
@paxxton I also heard that Thane's ME2 writer actually had a treatment for his disease for ME3
Modifié par paxxton, 05 décembre 2012 - 06:52 .
This winter on BSN, it's Hanar and Friends!smokingotter1 wrote...
I wasn't just complaining just about me but how trolls in general are starting to dominate the discussion here. Seems like we should rename this forum from "Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!" to "Hanar and friends"
Sounds like a comedy actually.
Modifié par LDS Darth Revan, 05 décembre 2012 - 06:54 .
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut