80611 réponses à ce sujet

[MaximizedAction]

The scientific equivalent to proving IT would be proving the theory of gravitation that describes that thing we observe in nature.

Of course interpreting a fictional story cannot be handled in the same way as science, but the analysis thereof can.
And you can't prove IT in the sense of "knowing for sure". We'll never be able to until BW says that trusting the Reapers was wrong. Which I don't even think they'll ever do.

So the best we can hope for is finding evidence that calms us, because in the end it's only an interpretation of what might've really happened/the writers' idea of what really happened was (if they even had one).

Modifié par MaximizedAction, 09 décembre 2012 - 11:40 .

[paxxton]

Restrider wrote...

paxxton wrote...

demersel wrote...

BansheeOwnage wrote...

You still want to destroy the reapers in refuse. You just don't do anything.

  

Yet it is a mystery why you don't do it if you still want to, given that you actually can do just that right this instant. 

Am I missing something here? We simply don't see what happens afterwards. The last scene is merely the result of choosing Refuse. Presumably, Organics tried to defeat the Reapers conventionally and they failed at large.

That's only the case, if you assume that the Stargazer Scene is to be taken literally.
Again, promoting the poll.

Why? Btw, she never says the war was won. Plus, the Stargazer scene is not part of the narrative but a message to the player.

[401 Kill]

Restrider wrote...


Lol, no need to convince me here. I was just trying to reason like a literalist.
Man, it really has to be frustrating to be a literalist, you have only clueless crap to support a literal view..

Well... Ignorance is Bliss.

[ThisOneIsPunny]

Restrider wrote...

Another dent in the Bad Writing Theory, I like it.

Good god, I hate the rest of this forum.
"We were wrong about this? Well.. Let's complain about something else!"

[Kesak12]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Kesak12 wrote...

TJBartlemus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Yeah. The dreams were freaking scary during my first playthrough.

I attempted beating the Guinness World Record in the most posts posted in a row on BSN. Unsuccessful, I'm afraid.

I'm sorry but you'll never beat the troll who spelt out Indoctrination Theory with each letter being a new post.  

I have to find these posts

Have fun.

thanks:D

[CmdrShep80]

Speaking of headaches from a couple of pages ago. Coincidence? Half the people at work called off Friday the majority of them for headaches. BioWare you're indoctrinating our workforce

[Kesak12]

CmdrShep80 wrote...

Speaking of headaches from a couple of pages ago. Coincidence? Half the people at work called off Friday the majority of them for headaches. BioWare you're indoctrinating our workforce

Mabye thats why i have this headache today. Bioware is indoctrinating me through the internet.

[CmdrShep80]

Lokanaiya wrote...

I seem to remember that T78 means either "crime against nature" or "infrasound."

so trying again:

 2012 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code T75.23 Vertigo from infrasound[*]T75.23 is not a billable ICD-10-CM diagnosis code and cannot be used to indicate a medical diagnosis.[*]There are 3 codes below T75.23 that describe this diagnosis in greater detail.[*]ICD-10-CM codes come into effect beginning October 1, 2013, therefore, this and all ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes should only be used for training or planning purposes until then.[/list]Type 1 Excludes [*]vertigo NOS (R42)[/list]The following ICD-10-CM Index entries contain back-references to ICD-10-CM T75.23:[*]Vertigo R42VibrationT75.20vertigo from infrasound T75.23[/list]
S00-T88 T75.22XSICD10Data.com NavigatorT75.23XA V00-Y99

[BansheeOwnage]

401 Kill wrote...

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Ah yes, SpectreOwnage....

That's who that was???

WE ARE LEGION. OUR NUMBERS WILL DARKEN THE SKY OF EVERY WORLD.

[CmdrShep80]

 So trying again:

 2012 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code T75.23 Vertigo from infrasound[*]T75.23 is not a billable ICD-10-CM diagnosis code and cannot be used to indicate a medical diagnosis.[*]There are 3 codes below T75.23 that describe this diagnosis in greater detail.[*]ICD-10-CM codes come into effect beginning October 1, 2013, therefore, this and all ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes should only be used for training or planning purposes until then.[/list]Type 1 Excludes [*]vertigo NOS (R42)[/list]The following ICD-10-CM Index entries contain back-references to ICD-10-CM T75.23:[*]Vertigo R42VibrationT75.20vertigo from infrasound T75.23[/list]
S00-T88 T75.22XSICD10Data.com NavigatorT75.23XA V00-Y99

[paxxton]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Kesak12 wrote...

TJBartlemus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Yeah. The dreams were freaking scary during my first playthrough.

I attempted beating the Guinness World Record in the most posts posted in a row on BSN. Unsuccessful, I'm afraid.

I'm sorry but you'll never beat the troll who spelt out Indoctrination Theory with each letter being a new post.  

I have to find these posts

Have fun.

But...that troll failed - he didn't spell it continuously.

Besides, while not trolling at all, Page 945 is oddsome and fun stuff.

[hukbum]

Restrider wrote...

hukbum wrote...

Damn youtube. Wonna litsen to creepy noises and all of a sudden a AUDI commercial starts ...

Gern geschehen (Ich kanns wirklich empfehlen)!

Thanks!

[CmdrShep80]

Well at least it posted twice finally. That's the T75 code from ICD 10.

[401 Kill]

ThisOneIsPunny wrote...

Restrider wrote...

Another dent in the Bad Writing Theory, I like it.

Good god, I hate the rest of this forum.
"We were wrong about this? Well.. Let's complain about something else!"

I understand why Mike Gamble cussed out that guy now. I wouldn't look down upon him if he pulls a Buzz Aldrin and punches the next guy who says that to his face.

[DextroDNA]

IT just confirmed by Mike Gamble on Twitter.

[TJBartlemus]

BansheeOwnage wrote...
Have fun.

Hilarious. It's old stuff but I still laugh at it.  

jgibson14352 wrote...

Spectreownage wrote...

 My combo(the darknness) must not be breached!!!!!

your spamming (the stupid) MUST BE BANNED!

classic. 

Modifié par TJBartlemus, 09 décembre 2012 - 11:51 .

[Restrider]

ThisOneIsPunny wrote...

Restrider wrote...

Another dent in the Bad Writing Theory, I like it.

Good god, I hate the rest of this forum.
"We were wrong about this? Well.. Let's complain about something else!"

The best part is, people complaining that the community has better ideas for story threads...
I mean, COME ON!
That story was obviously intended by the writers, but only implemented in a very subtle way, that only the observant player would notice. They community did not invent that story thread!

[401 Kill]

RussianZombeh wrote...

IT just confirmed by Mike Gamble on Twitter.

Does this prove IT?

[paxxton]

RussianZombeh wrote...

IT just confirmed by Mike Gamble on Twitter.

[Restrider]

CmdrShep80 wrote...

Well at least it posted twice finally. That's the T75 code from ICD 10.

But the code is usually T78, isn't it?

[BansheeOwnage]

401 Kill wrote...

RussianZombeh wrote...

IT just confirmed by Mike Gamble on Twitter.

Does this prove IT?

LOL

[CmdrShep80]

 Home > 2012 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes > Injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes S00-T88 > Other and unspecified effects of external causes T66-T78 >Adverse effects, not elsewhere classified T78- >
T78.8XXA…… initial encounterT78.8XXD…… subsequent encounterT78.8XXS…… sequela

the rest of the section is about food allergies. But there's on on just effects not otherwise specified. The above. Indoctrination doesn't currently have a medical code

[byne]

Kesak12 wrote...

CmdrShep80 wrote...

Speaking of headaches from a couple of pages ago. Coincidence? Half the people at work called off Friday the majority of them for headaches. BioWare you're indoctrinating our workforce

Mabye thats why i have this headache today. Bioware is indoctrinating me through the internet.

I literally cannot think of single day over the past few years where I havent had a headache at some point during the day.

It kind of sucks.

[paxxton]

What do all those codes have to do with IT?

[CmdrShep80]

Restrider wrote...

CmdrShep80 wrote...

Well at least it posted twice finally. That's the T75 code from ICD 10.

But the code is usually T78, isn't it?

yep. I was getting to that it wouldn't let me do both. Also the thing on 78 I posted. Indoctrination is also an adverse effect too.