Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
80611 réponses à ce sujet

#64601
Big_Boss9

Big_Boss9
  • Members
  • 532 messages

paxxton wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

If it wasn't for Shepard, who had not yet made his presence felt, Sovereign would have succeeded

But they already knew it thanks to the simulation. It was down to individual atoms and DNA. They simulated his entire life. In fact they simulate all the time the whole Galaxy like that.

If that were the case, Sovereign would've been familiar with and intrigued by Shepard the same way Harbinger was before he/she did anything. Except that's not what happened. Shep didn't garner the attention of the Reapers until AFTER he/she foiled Sovereign's plan. Also, what simulation? Now you're just making **** up.

Modifié par Big_Boss9, 10 décembre 2012 - 04:32 .


#64602
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

Big_Boss9 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

If it wasn't for Shepard, who had not yet made his presence felt, Sovereign would have succeeded

But they already knew it thanks to the simulation. It was down to individual atoms and DNA. They simulated his entire life. In fact they simulate all the time the whole Galaxy like that.

If that were the case, Sovereign would've been familiar with and intrigued by Shepard the same way Harbinger was. Except that's not what happened. Shep didn't garner the attention of the Reapers until AFTER he/she foiled Sovereign's plan. Also, what simulation? Now you're just making **** up.

Sovereign worked independently. He didn't have the knowledge of the simulation.

The Simulation is key.

Besides, I told you it's my original interpretation. I don't call it canonical.

Modifié par paxxton, 10 décembre 2012 - 04:38 .


#64603
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages
Hey guys what's up. Been watching Young Justice, and Criminalminds.

#64604
Fur28

Fur28
  • Members
  • 729 messages

masster blaster wrote...

Hey guys what's up. Been watching Young Justice, and Criminalminds.


Young Justice rules!, shame its on hiatus

#64605
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

masster blaster wrote...

Hey guys what's up. Been watching Young Justice, and Criminalminds.

Demersel found voices on the Normandy but I still don't know what it means for IT. Check out his posts from the last 2-3 pages.

#64606
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages
Finally somebody else heared the voices to. I thought I was the only one.

#64607
Rifneno

Rifneno
  • Members
  • 12 076 messages

spotlessvoid wrote...

I doubt the Reapers would so readily sacrifice a Sovereign class Reaper.


That's the only reason I don't ball BS on Vigil. When you put him under the microscope, it's extremely suspicious. He even uses almost the exact same phrasing as Sovereign about something. But when you get right down to it, there's no way that they'd have sacrificed Sovereign on purpose.

Big_Boss9 wrote...

If that were the case, Sovereign would've been familiar with and intrigued by Shepard the same way Harbinger was before he/she did anything. Except that's not what happened. Shep didn't garner the attention of the Reapers until AFTER he/she foiled Sovereign's plan. Also, what simulation? Now you're just making **** up.


Actually that's not entirely true. When you get to the final villain speech with Saren (the one where you can convince him to kill himself), he talks about Sovereign now recognizing Shepard's potential and tries to get Shepard to join Sovereign too.

#64608
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

masster blaster wrote...

Finally somebody else heared the voices to. I thought I was the only one.

Yes, but those voices are from the terminals, video/voice chats, news feeds in the War Room.

#64609
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

Rifneno wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

I doubt the Reapers would so readily sacrifice a Sovereign class Reaper.


That's the only reason I don't ball BS on Vigil. When you put him under the microscope, it's extremely suspicious. He even uses almost the exact same phrasing as Sovereign about something. But when you get right down to it, there's no way that they'd have sacrificed Sovereign on purpose.

Big_Boss9 wrote...

If that were the case, Sovereign would've been familiar with and intrigued by Shepard the same way Harbinger was before he/she did anything. Except that's not what happened. Shep didn't garner the attention of the Reapers until AFTER he/she foiled Sovereign's plan. Also, what simulation? Now you're just making **** up.


Actually that's not entirely true. When you get to the final villain speech with Saren (the one where you can convince him to kill himself), he talks about Sovereign now recognizing Shepard's potential and tries to get Shepard to join Sovereign too.

Sovereign starts to realize that he was cheated on by the rest of the Reapers and tries to persuade Shepard (through Saren) to team up against the rest when they pour through the Citadel.

#64610
Lokanaiya

Lokanaiya
  • Members
  • 685 messages

paxxton wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Finally somebody else heared the voices to. I thought I was the only one.

Yes, but those voices are from the terminals, video/voice chats, news feeds in the War Room.


Really? Coats and Shepard are both on the terminals, as are quotes from various parts of the game? How odd.
.

#64611
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

Lokanaiya wrote...

paxxton wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Finally somebody else heared the voices to. I thought I was the only one.

Yes, but those voices are from the terminals, video/voice chats, news feeds in the War Room.


Really? Coats and Shepard are both on the terminals, as are quotes from various parts of the game? How odd.
.

No, no. I didn't recognize Shepard's voice. For me it was some random comm from the battlefield. But I might be mistaken.

Modifié par paxxton, 10 décembre 2012 - 04:56 .


#64612
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages

Lokanaiya wrote...

paxxton wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Finally somebody else heared the voices to. I thought I was the only one.

Yes, but those voices are from the terminals, video/voice chats, news feeds in the War Room.


Really? Coats and Shepard are both on the terminals, as are quotes from various parts of the game? How odd.
.


And if they are on the terminals - why weren't they there BEFORE the Rannoch reaper mission (i.e. - MOST OF THE GAME??)

#64613
The Aesthetic Ghant

The Aesthetic Ghant
  • Members
  • 1 121 messages
After the EC will someone please give me a solid, evidence laden reason why this thread is still here? Or more specifically why this theory still matters as entertaining as it was?

#64614
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

demersel wrote...

Lokanaiya wrote...

paxxton wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Finally somebody else heared the voices to. I thought I was the only one.

Yes, but those voices are from the terminals, video/voice chats, news feeds in the War Room.


Really? Coats and Shepard are both on the terminals, as are quotes from various parts of the game? How odd.
.


And if they are on the terminals - why weren't they there BEFORE the Rannoch reaper mission (i.e. - MOST OF THE GAME??)

As far as I know the war gets gradually more intense the further into the game we proceed. Hence increasingly larger number of refugees on the Citadel and more Reaper ships on the Galaxy Map.

Modifié par paxxton, 10 décembre 2012 - 05:00 .


#64615
spotlessvoid

spotlessvoid
  • Members
  • 3 497 messages
If, IF, we can verify those voices are only present after Ranoch, then we may actually be on to something.

#64616
spotlessvoid

spotlessvoid
  • Members
  • 3 497 messages

The Aesthetic Ghant wrote...

After the EC will someone please give me a solid, evidence laden reason why this thread is still here? Or more specifically why this theory still matters as entertaining as it was?


Personally? Never had much interest in shiny bells

#64617
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages
The questions are:
1. Are the voices Shepard's and Coats'?
2. Are they from the future in the game's timeline?

Modifié par paxxton, 10 décembre 2012 - 05:26 .


#64618
Lokanaiya

Lokanaiya
  • Members
  • 685 messages
Were we ever told exactly what people were doing in the War Room anyways? I remember that either Hackett or Anderson were planning on making it their mobile command center, but since both got caught up in other stuff that doesn't seem to be true anymore. So what ARE the people working on in there?

#64619
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages

SwobyJ wrote...

Hey guys, I posted this elsewhere, but here's my take.


Literal:

Synthesis - He dies,
but his 'essence' is spread in order to change all of the galaxy. In a
way, think 'good husks' (with Shepard as the..um..heh.. 'Catalyst', the
failures of the Reapers is brought to success) So he lives on in others.

Low EMS Control - He dies, but his 'essence' is put into a Reaper (a leader one?). Galaxy is kinda poop. So he lives on as as new Guardian of the galaxy.
High EMS Control - He dies, but his 'essence' is put into a Reaper (a leader one?). Galaxy is pretty alright. So he lives on as a new Guardian of the galaxy.

Low EMS Destroy - He dies, and Reapers are destroyed. Galaxy is kinda poop.
High EMS Destroy - He dies, and Reapers are destroyed. Galaxy is pretty alright.
Max EMS Destroy - He lives, and Reapers are destroyed. Galaxy is pretty alright.

Refuse - He dies, and the cycle is continued. Next cycle galaxy is at least hinted to have defeated the Reapers.

So
he dies in all but one ending. He's copied into a framework for a
Reaper AI in Control, and used as the framework for spacemagic in all
synthetics and organics in Synthesis, but his ....well, as Harbinger
(you know, the one who was supposed to be the 'big bad'?) put it: Pain
is an illusion. The flesh is a machine.

Shepard, as we know him
for 99% of the series, has died in all but one ending. Shepard, as we
may wonder him to be (Dominator), lives in Control, to some players.
Shepard, as we may wish him to be (Savior), lives in Synthesis, to some
players. But again, that's up to perception. His mortal form is
absolutely killed in all but one ending though.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And
now my personal Indoctrination take. Yay more interesting! First, will
be what I think the ending slides, scenes, and wording by the
Catalyst/Shep-AI/EDI/Hackett really mean, and then I will say what I
think is actually happening outside of the dream. Again, personal take.
Don't go flailing around calling me an idiot.

Messages:

Synthesis
- EDI is in a dream world, and she can't even tell (as she 'lacks
salient information'). She can't tell that she's in his matrix, and
everyone else is trapped. Now, the Reapers truly understand organics,
because they took what Shepard learned about organic-synthetic relations
and utilized it into what is the new form of the cycle, one where
Javik... doesn't question the Reapers. One where EDI doesn't reprogram
herself ('learning'), but instead is grateful for being provided the
means to emotions. One where all organic live is covered with green
techno-squigglies.
Anyway, is Shepard dead here? Yes. He's at least part of a Reaper now, grats.

NOTE:
I picked Synthesis on my first playthrough. I love the ideals of it,
but disagree strongly with allowing the Reaper Controller to provide the
means to it, in such a short timeframe. Spells out disaster to me, and
the ending doesn't give me nearly enough answers on how it really plays
out. EDI being happy can be hugely subjective information.

Low/High
EMS Control - You're now just as bad as the Reapers. They, even in
their arrogantassery, continued in the series to regard themselves as
the saviors of the galaxy, even as they *kill off trilions* of its
inhabitants. You embraced the methods and means that just 10 minutes
ago, you were shouting down the Illusive Man over. In the end, you're
shown to be on the inside of a Reaper, which regardless of your internal
RPing, *every* Shepard would have been against until the end. If you
chose Control to ensure peace, how will you enforce this peace? If you
chose it to rule the galaxy, how will you exercise this rule? Your
troops are husks of organics, and Reapers still have the blood of
trillions on them. What's wrong with this picture? Is Shepard dead here?
Yes. And in more ways than one...
All you do in Control is give the Reapers another chief personality to make into their new Shepard Reaper.

Low
EMS Destroy - You stuck to the plan, to stop the Reapers at any cost.
But it can be debated that the cost this time, was too great. The galaxy
is hobbling along, and probably won't get on its feet for at least
decades, if some other huge war doesn't break out. You've left the
galaxy in huge uncertainty, and you know this is a 'Future Many Will
Never See'. Dead? Yes.

High
EMS Destroy - You were simply much more prepared, and had a much better
fate after the Reapers' destruction. However, for some reason, it
wasn't enough, and are you dead? Yes.

Max
EMS Destroy - Hope. The embodiment of Shepard, by the time the end of
ME3 rolls around. He climbed out of the rubble of the Council Chambers
in ME1. He helped his allies out of it in ME2. And now, in ME3, he's
stuck, weakened by the conflict both internally and externally, waiting
for someone to pull him out of the rubble instead, this time around.
Alive? No - they all but explicitly state it.

Refuse
- You gave up. Amazing Shepard speech, yes, but it missed one thing...
you saw an opportunity to stop the Reapers, and you didn't take it.
While its a moral victory in some ways, it also means that Shepard,
again, lost what makes him SHEPARD. In the view that the Crucible choice
is more symbolic and metaphorical, it means that Shepard has lost any
potential to stay as himself, and that the Reapers finally brought him
down, no delusion required. You beat the Reapers, but they beat the
galaxy. This is where you take the good parts of Javik's lessons into
context, but when you pick Refuse, you didn't, and you failed. You
retain some hope in the beacons, that maybe, next time, the next cycle's
species will clue in earlier... that the Crucible 'doesn't work'.


To end, my Indoctrination take:

I think that Shepard actually lives in all the high-EMS endings but Refuse.

Synthesis - Shepard may survive, but he'll be Saren 2.0.
The Paragon Shep hasn't used his ties to others as a strength, and
instead it blinded him to what is happening to him. The Renegade Shep
sees this as the way to get the job done, and to neutralize the threat.
Both are capitulations to the Reapers, and when Shepard wakes up, he'll
be fully converted to the Reapers, barring any standoff with his LI,
close friends, etc. EDI and the geth themselves, would have rejected
Synthesis at this point - why make this choice for them? You 'fell for
it'.

Low/High EMS Control - Not sure how EMS will play into it, but I think that Control leads to Shepard being TIM 2.0.
You'll not be fully indoctrinated, but quite enough to have your
actions play directly and indirectly into the Reapers' intentions. You
'dug the wrong way', and in thinking you avoided the Reapers'
'solution', you grasped the same 'energy' that Synthesis was even made
of. Yet, people will pick this because they think the Geth and EDI will
die and Synthesis is just too far out for them. It's a trap, but still a
more sneaky one. But come on! You've been warned against Control for at
least 2 games now! If you played ME2, you should know about Control. If
you played ME1 (and more), you should know about Synthesis!

Whether
Shepard survives is up to Bioware, if there's any post-ending Mass
Effect content (DLC, expansion, new game) that references the choice as
an indoctrination attempt. If I'm wrong, ok, but this is my take so far.

Low
EMS Destroy - You rejected the Reapers (sure I'll take your tech... and
destroy it and destroy you) and Destroy was only given as an option
because if it wasn't, then the whole damn illusion breaks down. Yet
break it, you did... with a gun. Like the rest of the series. Illusion
shatters. But, if EMS is really 'Shepard's Meter of Hope', then low EMS
means you're still a goner. You fought indoctrination and won, but you
didn't win in the battle for your life.

High EMS Destroy - Same as above, except you at least have hope enough for the galaxy to pull through.

Max EMS Destroy - I think that Shepard breathing in rubble is more of an easter egg,
than a legit scene. It's a lead in to future content, but it doesn't
mean that High EMS Destroy NEEDS to be the only one that Shepard's
physical form survives in. Anyway, aside from that, Max EMS Destroy
means that Shepard also has *hope in himself* to survive this war. You
both fought Indoctrination, but also it's effect on your psyche.

Refuse
- You're bleeding out in rubble, dead. Harbinger don't give a damn
about you at this point, and you sorely disappointed him. He needs you
alive and as you always were, not a 'coward' that won't even take the
chance to destroy the Reapers. You aren't the anomaly they thought you
were, and you succumbed to the pressure in the end.


Nice!

#64620
spotlessvoid

spotlessvoid
  • Members
  • 3 497 messages

Lokanaiya wrote...

Were we ever told exactly what people were doing in the War Room anyways? I remember that either Hackett or Anderson were planning on making it their mobile command center, but since both got caught up in other stuff that doesn't seem to be true anymore. So what ARE the people working on in there?


They're working on the extended cut

#64621
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages

spotlessvoid wrote...

If, IF, we can verify those voices are only present after Ranoch, then we may actually be on to something.


I can verify that. - I first encountered then after Rannoch. 

There are voices in the war room before - but they are nowhere near as intense - there are only like two, and they speak some mumbo-jumbo, like baby talk. 

Modifié par demersel, 10 décembre 2012 - 05:11 .


#64622
Lokanaiya

Lokanaiya
  • Members
  • 685 messages

spotlessvoid wrote...

Lokanaiya wrote...

Were we ever told exactly what people were doing in the War Room anyways? I remember that either Hackett or Anderson were planning on making it their mobile command center, but since both got caught up in other stuff that doesn't seem to be true anymore. So what ARE the people working on in there?


They're working on the extended cut


ROFL. That explains the "need reinforcements" quote. :lol:

#64623
spotlessvoid

spotlessvoid
  • Members
  • 3 497 messages

demersel wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

If, IF, we can verify those voices are only present after Ranoch, then we may actually be on to something.


I can verify that. - I first encountered then after Rannoch. 


Doomsday was right that without context or discernable pattern, there's no way to attribute anything more than ambient noise to it. That it only appears after Ranoch is either a big glitch, or there is meaning there.

#64624
The Aesthetic Ghant

The Aesthetic Ghant
  • Members
  • 1 121 messages

spotlessvoid wrote...

The Aesthetic Ghant wrote...

After the EC will someone please give me a solid, evidence laden reason why this thread is still here? Or more specifically why this theory still matters as entertaining as it was?


Personally? Never had much interest in shiny bells


Then you haven't lived.

Are you going to answer my question or not?

I'm genuinely curious.

#64625
spotlessvoid

spotlessvoid
  • Members
  • 3 497 messages
EC didn't disprove IT, but it's just a slide show to placate the fan rage. A shiny bell jingled in front of those who enjoy that sort of thing. The artistic integrity is coming