Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#65151
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 09:27
#65152
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 09:48
You're welcome.hukbum wrote...
Try Adblock Plus if you use firefox. Works fine and youtube is as it was before the ad-storm.401 Kill wrote...
And I ****ing hate the adds on YouTube my god, I can't even watch this from my laptop because of them.
(Who ever gave me the tip here, big THANKS again)
#65153
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 10:15
dorktainian wrote...
if you liken sheps breath scene to this then maybe...just maybe... shep waking up in destroy is NOT a good thing. If as suggested Cerberus want a hero...a figurehead for their own aims then shep is meant to survive so he can work for them? Indoctrinated? Just because he takes the breath does not mean he isnt indoctrinated.
What if there are no good choices in the final 3? They are all given to us....we are blinded by indoctrination into assuming they are the right choices... this entity has been wiping out entire civilisations and we are meant to trust his options? maybe the right choice is not to choose from the choices given but follow your own path? Thats why his reaper voice sounds pissed off when you do.
As far as the traitor on the normandy is concerned it would have to be EDI. now call me paranoid but how do you know that Dr Eva didn't survive and is masquerading as EDI? Dont forget TIM said they would ensure that EVA stayed loyal. Surely that would apply to hardware as well as software?
And don't forget that EVA didn't go down without a fight. Now had she WON the fight, that's extremely dangerous.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And regarding IT, there seem to be two kind of indoctrination that theorist would like to assert:
- full blown inception style hallucination, which is very convenient if not too easy,
- fight-club-esque delusion affecting Shepard's preception
The latter seems to be more coherent with the false messiah ploy,
a ploy that turns out to be Cerberus' modus of operandi.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's expand this a bit further with hypotetical scenario leading from Shepard waking up in destroy ending.
Shepard realize that he/she almost lead the entire galaxy into Reaper's trap, and it turns out that what he saw previously is actually happened in one way or another (dellusion):
- he could've shot garrus (marrauder shield)
- went into the conduit beam arriving at presidium monument,
- He find the place dark as it should with mountains of corpse, associating it with the collector's base,
- contemplate that something's not right (but accepting the delusion anyway by saying "make sense..." at the end)
- had an imaginary conversation with TIM and Anderson in the presidium area,
- shot himself in the head (like that edward norton did in fight-club movie)
- staggering half-conciously into the citadel tower elevator, and during that long ride, have an imaginary conversation with starbrat thingy,
- wen't into the council meeting chamber and open citadel's arm
- tens of thousands of troop lands after citadel's arm opened (I see no reason why if it improves the odd of winning)
- a battle ensues in the council chamber between reaper's ground troop and galactic alliance, explains why harbinger leaving the beam in the first place
- one of the explosion wakes Shepard.
but it could just be me, trying to make sense out of that mess...
#65154
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 10:33
Could be a possibility.
#65155
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 10:41
Restrider wrote...
That's pretty much Waking Nightmare Theory only without the Crucible firing.
Could be a possibility.
The crucible firing is Shepard mind frying catatonizing him/her immediately (or worse, the reaper assuming control of his body)
In destroy ending, because of high EMS allowing troops to be deployed after citadel's arm open,
and him/her eluding Reaper's brainwashing, he survived.
#65156
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 11:00
#65157
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 11:06
RavenEyry wrote...
Fun fact for people debating reapers age yesterday, the scar on Klendagon is 37 million years old, so that's the minimum.
Yep. And I tend to think that's closer to the real age. The only place one billion is mentioned is for the Leviathan of Dis, which was found by the Batarians. One only needs read the description of Khar'shan to know how *ahem* honest the Hegemony is with such things.
And while this is not an argument that works in universe, it is a good one from a writing perspecitve: at the end of ME1 Shepard says that the Reapers are coming, with hundreds, maybe thousands of ships. If they are one billion years old, that'd be about 20,000, which doesn't exactly match that very well. If they're about 40 million then they'd have about 750-1000, which fits perfectly.
#65158
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 11:29
#65159
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 11:31
Fur28 wrote...
Do the repares make more than one reaper per cycle because of many races in a cycle?, or does a race needs an especific type of DNA to be transformed into a reaper?
I believe it's only one Sovereign class per cycle, and the rest are made into Destroyers.
#65160
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 11:31
Multiple according to Javik. Though it's unclear if they even do multiple from one race if enough source material is found.Fur28 wrote...
Do the repares make more than one reaper per cycle because of many races in a cycle?, or does a race needs an especific type of DNA to be transformed into a reaper?
#65161
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 11:33
There is nothing to back up this claim. Could be true, could not be true.BleedingUranium wrote...
Fur28 wrote...
Do the repares make more than one reaper per cycle because of many races in a cycle?, or does a race needs an especific type of DNA to be transformed into a reaper?
I believe it's only one Sovereign class per cycle, and the rest are made into Destroyers.
#65162
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 11:43
Anyway, from the journal of Dr. Cayce who was studying the 'prothean' artifact in firewalker: "It's like they're inside my head, stealing my thoughts"
#65163
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 11:48
RavenEyry wrote...
I thought the codex said something about destroyers being made from 'less worthy' races, which is why people have been saying that since day 1.
Anyway, from the journal of Dr. Cayce who was studying the 'prothean' artifact in firewalker: "It's like they're inside my head, stealing my thoughts"
Does the codex says why we dont see race specific or different type of Sovereign type-reapers?
And how "less worthier" could a race have been to become one of those cutie little ones we see in From Ashes
Modifié par Fur28, 11 décembre 2012 - 11:49 .
#65164
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 11:48
Modifié par Fur28, 11 décembre 2012 - 11:48 .
#65165
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 11:54
Fur28 wrote...
RavenEyry wrote...
I thought the codex said something about destroyers being made from 'less worthy' races, which is why people have been saying that since day 1.
Anyway, from the journal of Dr. Cayce who was studying the 'prothean' artifact in firewalker: "It's like they're inside my head, stealing my thoughts"
Does the codex says why we dont see race specific or different type of Sovereign type-reapers?
And how "less worthier" could a race have been to become one of those cutie little ones we see in From Ashes
All Sovereign class Reapers do look the same. It's the core, the true Reaper itself, that's based on the physical shape of the species it was made from. Think of the cuttlefish part as a giant suit of armour.
#65166
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:00
#65167
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:06
ME2 likes to disagree where you can see at least 4 variations of shells, and one of them is even displayed in ME3 at a Cerberus base. The one where you have to gather the Reaper tech.BleedingUranium wrote...
Fur28 wrote...
RavenEyry wrote...
I thought the codex said something about destroyers being made from 'less worthy' races, which is why people have been saying that since day 1.
Anyway, from the journal of Dr. Cayce who was studying the 'prothean' artifact in firewalker: "It's like they're inside my head, stealing my thoughts"
Does the codex says why we dont see race specific or different type of Sovereign type-reapers?
And how "less worthier" could a race have been to become one of those cutie little ones we see in From Ashes
All Sovereign class Reapers do look the same. It's the core, the true Reaper itself, that's based on the physical shape of the species it was made from. Think of the cuttlefish part as a giant suit of armour.
Modifié par MegumiAzusa, 11 décembre 2012 - 12:09 .
#65168
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:12
Sovereign class dreadnoughts
Destroyers
Processor ships
Troop transports
mentioned in the codex in ME3...
#65169
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:13
seem to remember seeing a representation od 'the human reaper' in its shell and it was facing backwards. would this be a curse on whoever was reaperised in that they could see the destruction they have just caused?Rifneno wrote...
Leviathan specifically stated that a SINGLE Reaper is created each cycle. Something along the lines of "Perfect in its construction, in our image".
#65170
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:16
at the end of mass effect 2 joker (i think) gives shep a screen with piccys of harbinger on it. How did he get them when harbie was still in darkspace?
#65171
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:18
Restrider wrote...
We have
Sovereign class dreadnoughts
Destroyers
Processor ships
Troop transports
mentioned in the codex in ME3...
Right, which is what those in the picture are, most likely.
#65172
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:19
dorktainian wrote...
also...
at the end of mass effect 2 joker (i think) gives shep a screen with piccys of harbinger on it. How did he get them when harbie was still in darkspace?
EDI probably took that info from files in the Collector Base.
#65173
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:19
No, there are no Destroyers and each ship is about the same size.BleedingUranium wrote...
Restrider wrote...
We have
Sovereign class dreadnoughts
Destroyers
Processor ships
Troop transports
mentioned in the codex in ME3...
Right, which is what those in the picture are, most likely.
Modifié par MegumiAzusa, 11 décembre 2012 - 12:20 .
#65174
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:20
Where does it say they're all sovereign class capitals?MegumiAzusa wrote...
ME2 likes to disagree where you can see at least 4 variations of shells, and one of them is even displayed in ME3 at a Cerberus base. The one where you have to gather the Reaper tech.
#65175
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:21
MegumiAzusa wrote...
No, there are no Destroyers and each ship is about the same size.BleedingUranium wrote...
Restrider wrote...
We have
Sovereign class dreadnoughts
Destroyers
Processor ships
Troop transports
mentioned in the codex in ME3...
Right, which is what those in the picture are, most likely.
Then there are no Destroyers there. Doesn't change the idea.
Modifié par BleedingUranium, 11 décembre 2012 - 12:21 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





