MegumiAzusa wrote...
You assume it's just flicking a switch and it just turns off.spotlessvoid wrote...
Again , Reapers counter cycle adaptations for billions of years, but now it's all done for? Why, because the Reapers don't take the crucible seriously? How does a group so cavalier and so blatantly reckless last that long?
Turn off the ****ing beam! Problem solved.
How should I know? Fact is you can't prove the opposite either.spotlessvoid wrote...
What makes a cycle ready? Shepard?MegumiAzusa wrote...
Nothing says the next cycle would be ready. All they do know is at that moment synthesis is possible.spotlessvoid wrote...
Why not just plant crucible designs that only offer synthesis? It's not like this cycle knows wtf they're building.
Also every Cycle adapts and changes the Crucible, just look at the changes we do through the war assets. Point is a Crucible that allows synthesis always also allows destroy.
gunslinger_ruiz wrote...
Did someone say Rebar or Reaper cables again? Links in my sig for image analysis.
1. As I said the EC introduced errors in everything.byne wrote...
Thats literally what happens if you refuse.MegumiAzusa wrote...
You assume it's just flicking a switch and it just turns off.spotlessvoid wrote...
Again , Reapers counter cycle adaptations for billions of years, but now it's all done for? Why, because the Reapers don't take the crucible seriously? How does a group so cavalier and so blatantly reckless last that long?
Turn off the ****ing beam! Problem solved.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Nothing says the next cycle would be ready. All they do know is at that moment synthesis is possible.spotlessvoid wrote...
Why not just plant crucible designs that only offer synthesis? It's not like this cycle knows wtf they're building.
Also every Cycle adapts and changes the Crucible, just look at the changes we do through the war assets. Point is a Crucible that allows synthesis always also allows destroy.
As I said.spotlessvoid wrote...
Looks like cables to me.gunslinger_ruiz wrote...
Did someone say Rebar or Reaper cables again? Links in my sig for image analysis.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
1. As I said the EC introduced errors in everything.byne wrote...
Thats literally what happens if you refuse.MegumiAzusa wrote...
You assume it's just flicking a switch and it just turns off.spotlessvoid wrote...
Again , Reapers counter cycle adaptations for billions of years, but now it's all done for? Why, because the Reapers don't take the crucible seriously? How does a group so cavalier and so blatantly reckless last that long?
Turn off the ****ing beam! Problem solved.
2. My guess is it's not as much "turned off" but the Crucible gets destroyed in the same manner if you don't act pre EC. I would count for the inaction still triggering the critical mission failure as an oversight, there are enough of these so while it may not be one it certainly can be one and neither can be proven.
Then point out the flaws and show that it is less convincing then the mess that is IT.BleedingUranium wrote...
What the f*ck? That's like wrong in eight different ways!MegumiAzusa wrote...
Nothing says the next cycle would be ready. All they do know is at that moment synthesis is possible.spotlessvoid wrote...
Why not just plant crucible designs that only offer synthesis? It's not like this cycle knows wtf they're building.
Also every Cycle adapts and changes the Crucible, just look at the changes we do through the war assets. Point is a Crucible that allows synthesis always also allows destroy.
I don't see how the literal ending was worse pre EC. Imo it's the other way round.BleedingUranium wrote...
No. Pre EC the literal ending was a mess, and it still is after. Pre EC IT made perfect sense, and it still does after.MegumiAzusa wrote...
1. As I said the EC introduced errors in everything.byne wrote...
Thats literally what happens if you refuse.MegumiAzusa wrote...
You assume it's just flicking a switch and it just turns off.spotlessvoid wrote...
Again , Reapers counter cycle adaptations for billions of years, but now it's all done for? Why, because the Reapers don't take the crucible seriously? How does a group so cavalier and so blatantly reckless last that long?
Turn off the ****ing beam! Problem solved.
2. My guess is it's not as much "turned off" but the Crucible gets destroyed in the same manner if you don't act pre EC. I would count for the inaction still triggering the critical mission failure as an oversight, there are enough of these so while it may not be one it certainly can be one and neither can be proven.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
As I said.spotlessvoid wrote...
Looks like cables to me.gunslinger_ruiz wrote...
Did someone say Rebar or Reaper cables again? Links in my sig for image analysis.
spotlessvoid wrote...
Why does the beam lead to the control panel?
Dozens of kilometers long and it goes to the only few hundred yards they are vulnerable. How convenient
Guest_magnetite_*
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Then point out the flaws and show that it is less convincing then the mess that is IT.
Which I didn't say. Look up the context before trying to create an argument where none is.spotlessvoid wrote...
I've seen gunslingers analysis before. Reaper cables do not automatically equal citadel.MegumiAzusa wrote...
As I said.spotlessvoid wrote...
Looks like cables to me.gunslinger_ruiz wrote...
Did someone say Rebar or Reaper cables again? Links in my sig for image analysis.
I still can't see rebar but cables. Also we only see some metallic plates which actually look nothing like object Rho but more like the plates used at the docking ports of the Geth Dreadnaught.
I see cables.
It is interesting how your rebar is always between the "concrete" blocks.
[...]
Nope. The IT being a mess doesn't mean it has some good arguments.spotlessvoid wrote...
Megumi has gone full blown literalist
Modifié par MegumiAzusa, 12 décembre 2012 - 08:26 .
Going on then, get up there.MegumiAzusa wrote...
Nope. The IT being a mess doesn't mean it has some good arguments.spotlessvoid wrote...
Megumi has gone full blown literalist
Also as established in the post before you want to see me in a certain way.
spotlessvoid wrote...
Megumi has gone full blown literalist
Shep surviving it all just so she can be indoctrinated at the right time. How convenientspotlessvoid wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
Why does the beam lead to the control panel?
Dozens of kilometers long and it goes to the only few hundred yards they are vulnerable. How convenient
spotlessvoid wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
Why does the beam lead to the control panel?
Dozens of kilometers long and it goes to the only few hundred yards they are vulnerable. How convenient
I am using assumptions that don't contradict what we are shown.BleedingUranium wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
Megumi has gone full blown literalist
Yeah, this is just pointless. She goes on about us not having proof or using assumptions, and yet that's what she does in nearly ever post.
spotlessvoid wrote...
I've seen gunslingers analysis before. Reaper cables do not automatically equal citadel.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut