Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#65951
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:10
#65952
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:11
Morinth (in ME 3): Shriek!
#65953
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:12
But you just said yourself the Crucible is space magic, even in its basic function of destroy. Now you say space magic is only used in the hallucination? The whole reason of ME3 is to hold out until we can use space magic to win against the Reapers.paxxton wrote...
IT is not based on space magic but on denying that the ending was real. Space Magic is used in the hallucination precisely because it is a hallucination.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Fancy BS may still be just BS. Explanation: you can't apply the rule that a sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic to everything. It would make things impossible to understand, evaluate or dismiss. I'm not saying Synthesis is impossible but it feels like a bit of a cop-out to make it the way it is.
Forget Synthesis, the Crucible itself makes no sense and is complete and utter space magic device developed by species with a low level of tech and they supposedly made the most advanced thing ever.
The crucible is a cop out.
I wonder how IT would end without the use of this space magic.
#65954
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:12
paxxton wrote...
So we can assume that the function of the Crucible presented by the Catalyst is not how it really works because it is impossible in terms of coherence. //fancy lingo
So what would the function be?
#65955
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:12
Shepard wakes up in London from being knocked out by Harbinger's laser and either is taken away by medics or continues the run to the real beam. But since the real beam appears to have been deactivated in the Breath Scene the former (or a retreat) is more probable.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
IT is not based on space magic but on denying that the ending was real. Space Magic is used in the hallucination precisely because it is a hallucination.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Fancy BS may still be just BS. Explanation: you can't apply the rule that a sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic to everything. It would make things impossible to understand, evaluate or dismiss. I'm not saying Synthesis is impossible but it feels like a bit of a cop-out to make it the way it is.
Forget Synthesis, the Crucible itself makes no sense and is complete and utter space magic device developed by species with a low level of tech and they supposedly made the most advanced thing ever.
The crucible is a cop out.
I wonder how IT would end without the use of this space magic.
Ok.... how would it end without using this space magic?
#65956
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:14
Either the original, presented throughout the game, or a booby trap planted by the Reapers.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
So we can assume that the function of the Crucible presented by the Catalyst is not how it really works because it is impossible in terms of coherence. //fancy lingo
So what would the function be?
#65957
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:15
And how do you suggest we win instead? We just used all of our resources for the Crucible? Anything else is an even bigger arse pull.paxxton wrote...
Shepard wakes up in London from being knocked out by Harbinger's laser and either is taken away by medics or continues the run to the real beam. But since the real beam appears to have been deactivated in the Breath Scene the former (or a retreat) is more probable.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
IT is not based on space magic but on denying that the ending was real. Space Magic is used in the hallucination precisely because it is a hallucination.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Fancy BS may still be just BS. Explanation: you can't apply the rule that a sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic to everything. It would make things impossible to understand, evaluate or dismiss. I'm not saying Synthesis is impossible but it feels like a bit of a cop-out to make it the way it is.
Forget Synthesis, the Crucible itself makes no sense and is complete and utter space magic device developed by species with a low level of tech and they supposedly made the most advanced thing ever.
The crucible is a cop out.
I wonder how IT would end without the use of this space magic.
Ok.... how would it end without using this space magic?
#65958
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:18
paxxton wrote...
Either the original, presented throughout the game, or a booby trap planted by the Reapers.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
So we can assume that the function of the Crucible presented by the Catalyst is not how it really works because it is impossible in terms of coherence. //fancy lingo
So what would the function be?
The original would be space magic.
Archengeia made a good point on it being a Reaper trap and I think it is plausible, it makes sense somewhat.
Though then a new way to defeat the Reaper would be needed, either another ancient plausible device/weapon or a conventional victory against the Reapers.
Modifié par TheProtheans, 12 décembre 2012 - 05:20 .
#65959
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:20
Where the conventional victory is impossible and the other device would be even more facepalm.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Either the original, presented throughout the game, or a booby trap planted by the Reapers.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
So we can assume that the function of the Crucible presented by the Catalyst is not how it really works because it is impossible in terms of coherence. //fancy lingo
So what would the function be?
The original would be space magic.
Archengeia made a good point on it being a Reaper trap and I think it is plausible, it makes sense somewhat.
Though then a new way to defeat the Reaper would be needed, either another ancient plausible device/weapon or a conventional victory against the Reapers.
#65960
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:21
Either find another way or just lose the war. Would make sense with a high-profile mistake of bringing everybody to one place. ME4 would be about organizing resistance against the Reapers.MegumiAzusa wrote...
And how do you suggest we win instead? We just used all of our resources for the Crucible? Anything else is an even bigger arse pull.paxxton wrote...
Shepard wakes up in London from being knocked out by Harbinger's laser and either is taken away by medics or continues the run to the real beam. But since the real beam appears to have been deactivated in the Breath Scene the former (or a retreat) is more probable.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
IT is not based on space magic but on denying that the ending was real. Space Magic is used in the hallucination precisely because it is a hallucination.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Fancy BS may still be just BS. Explanation: you can't apply the rule that a sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic to everything. It would make things impossible to understand, evaluate or dismiss. I'm not saying Synthesis is impossible but it feels like a bit of a cop-out to make it the way it is.
Forget Synthesis, the Crucible itself makes no sense and is complete and utter space magic device developed by species with a low level of tech and they supposedly made the most advanced thing ever.
The crucible is a cop out.
I wonder how IT would end without the use of this space magic.
Ok.... how would it end without using this space magic?
#65961
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:23
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Where the conventional victory is impossible and the other device would be even more facepalm.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Either the original, presented throughout the game, or a booby trap planted by the Reapers.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
So we can assume that the function of the Crucible presented by the Catalyst is not how it really works because it is impossible in terms of coherence. //fancy lingo
So what would the function be?
The original would be space magic.
Archengeia made a good point on it being a Reaper trap and I think it is plausible, it makes sense somewhat.
Though then a new way to defeat the Reaper would be needed, either another ancient plausible device/weapon or a conventional victory against the Reapers.
So no matter where we go and if we stay here we will still be in fail.
Us losing and the next cycle preparing because of the early alert seems the only plausible way to end without something ridiculous.
I still think they should have rammed into the Char relay with something massive.
Modifié par TheProtheans, 12 décembre 2012 - 05:24 .
#65962
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:25
The Crucible coupled with the Citadel and the Mass Relay network would make a plausible weapon against the Reapers, sending out deactivation codes.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Either the original, presented throughout the game, or a booby trap planted by the Reapers.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
So we can assume that the function of the Crucible presented by the Catalyst is not how it really works because it is impossible in terms of coherence. //fancy lingo
So what would the function be?
The original would be space magic.
Archengeia made a good point on it being a Reaper trap and I think it is plausible, it makes sense somewhat.
Though then a new way to defeat the Reaper would be needed, either another ancient plausible device/weapon or a conventional victory against the Reapers.
#65963
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:29
paxxton wrote...
The Crucible coupled with the Citadel and the Mass Relay network would make a plausible weapon against the Reapers, sending out deactivation codes.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Either the original, presented throughout the game, or a booby trap planted by the Reapers.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
So we can assume that the function of the Crucible presented by the Catalyst is not how it really works because it is impossible in terms of coherence. //fancy lingo
So what would the function be?
The original would be space magic.
Archengeia made a good point on it being a Reaper trap and I think it is plausible, it makes sense somewhat.
Though then a new way to defeat the Reaper would be needed, either another ancient plausible device/weapon or a conventional victory against the Reapers.
Problem I have with it is the same problem I have with the Crucible in the literal version.
It's origins and how the the species got the schematics for it to work with the network on sending out codes makes little sense if any.
I mean really deactivation codes, why the Reapers would have deactivation codes is beyond me.
#65964
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:32
That would take too long. The Reapers would see it happening and lock up in their Quantom Shields. The Reapers were minutes outs from using the Alpha Relay, well within the supernove range, and yet survived.TheProtheans wrote...
I still think they should have rammed into the Char relay with something massive.
#65965
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:33
Or something along these lines. You can see how easily Leviathan dewactivates a Reaper in the DLC, right?TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
The Crucible coupled with the Citadel and the Mass Relay network would make a plausible weapon against the Reapers, sending out deactivation codes.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Either the original, presented throughout the game, or a booby trap planted by the Reapers.TheProtheans wrote...
paxxton wrote...
So we can assume that the function of the Crucible presented by the Catalyst is not how it really works because it is impossible in terms of coherence. //fancy lingo
So what would the function be?
The original would be space magic.
Archengeia made a good point on it being a Reaper trap and I think it is plausible, it makes sense somewhat.
Though then a new way to defeat the Reaper would be needed, either another ancient plausible device/weapon or a conventional victory against the Reapers.
Problem I have with it is the same problem I have with the Crucible in the literal version.
It's origins and how the the species got the schematics for it to work with the network on sending out codes makes little sense if any.
I mean really deactivation codes, why the Reapers would have deactivation codes is beyond me.
#65966
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:34
Minutes of ftl vs seconds of a sublight explosion. No I don't think it even touched them.LDS Darth Revan wrote...
That would take too long. The Reapers would see it happening and lock up in their Quantom Shields. The Reapers were minutes outs from using the Alpha Relay, well within the supernove range, and yet survived.TheProtheans wrote...
I still think they should have rammed into the Char relay with something massive.
#65967
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:36
#65968
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:37
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Minutes of ftl vs seconds of a sublight explosion. No I don't think it even touched them.LDS Darth Revan wrote...
That would take too long. The Reapers would see it happening and lock up in their Quantom Shields. The Reapers were minutes outs from using the Alpha Relay, well within the supernove range, and yet survived.TheProtheans wrote...
I still think they should have rammed into the Char relay with something massive.
Megumi's right on this one, you can't use the destroy relay tactic against things that can travel at FTL speeds.
#65969
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:37
Granted, but I still stand by the part about them having enough time to activate their Quantom Shielding. We know that those can survive a supernova due to the Mu Relay in ME1.MegumiAzusa wrote...
Minutes of ftl vs seconds of a sublight explosion. No I don't think it even touched them.LDS Darth Revan wrote...
That would take too long. The Reapers would see it happening and lock up in their Quantom Shields. The Reapers were minutes outs from using the Alpha Relay, well within the supernove range, and yet survived.TheProtheans wrote...
I still think they should have rammed into the Char relay with something massive.
#65970
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:37
Dwailing wrote...
I just had a thought about something. In a literal version of Control, Shepard just enslaved countless billions of "preserved" lives. Assuming Brat is telling the truth, this assertion is true. Why? Because he says that Shepard will replace him, and he controls, from a literal perspective, the Reapers absolutely. He owns them. That's the definition of slavery. If Shepard chooses Control, he's commiting a crime even worse, if you ask me, than simply killing them in Destroy. And this raises another question, IMHO. What happens to Brat in Synthesis? Does he still control the Reapers? If so, then does he control EVERYONE since everyone is supposedly connected to the Reapers in Synthesis?
Exactly.
#65971
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:39
I agree with the first part, and as for the second he probably just watched from a distance in order to keep his programming since while people are synthesized, his directive of preserving life will never be complete.Dwailing wrote...
I just had a thought about something. In a literal version of Control, Shepard just enslaved countless billions of "preserved" lives. Assuming Brat is telling the truth, this assertion is true. Why? Because he says that Shepard will replace him, and he controls, from a literal perspective, the Reapers absolutely. He owns them. That's the definition of slavery. If Shepard chooses Control, he's commiting a crime even worse, if you ask me, than simply killing them in Destroy. And this raises another question, IMHO. What happens to Brat in Synthesis? Does he still control the Reapers? If so, then does he control EVERYONE since everyone is supposedly connected to the Reapers in Synthesis?
#65972
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:40
This does make the choice bad, this does not make it impossible.BleedingUranium wrote...
Exactly.Dwailing wrote...
I just had a thought about something. In a literal version of Control, Shepard just enslaved countless billions of "preserved" lives. Assuming Brat is telling the truth, this assertion is true. Why? Because he says that Shepard will replace him, and he controls, from a literal perspective, the Reapers absolutely. He owns them. That's the definition of slavery. If Shepard chooses Control, he's commiting a crime even worse, if you ask me, than simply killing them in Destroy. And this raises another question, IMHO. What happens to Brat in Synthesis? Does he still control the Reapers? If so, then does he control EVERYONE since everyone is supposedly connected to the Reapers in Synthesis?
#65973
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:41
Modifié par N7L4D, 12 décembre 2012 - 05:44 .
#65974
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:45
MegumiAzusa wrote...
This does make the choice bad, this does not make it impossible.BleedingUranium wrote...
Exactly.Dwailing wrote...
I just had a thought about something. In a literal version of Control, Shepard just enslaved countless billions of "preserved" lives. Assuming Brat is telling the truth, this assertion is true. Why? Because he says that Shepard will replace him, and he controls, from a literal perspective, the Reapers absolutely. He owns them. That's the definition of slavery. If Shepard chooses Control, he's commiting a crime even worse, if you ask me, than simply killing them in Destroy. And this raises another question, IMHO. What happens to Brat in Synthesis? Does he still control the Reapers? If so, then does he control EVERYONE since everyone is supposedly connected to the Reapers in Synthesis?
This is a post about themes, not whether it's possible or not.
#65975
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 05:47
N7L4D wrote...
I don't know if this counts as evidence or anything, but I was watching avengers emh, season 2 episode 4 or 5 I forgot, has harbingers voice actor and he says "so be it" and I swear it sounds exactly like the star child minus the reaperfied voice, and I just kept listening to both back to back, I don't think it means much but I felt I should tell some people lol
I'm pretty sure we figured out that the "So be it" line is actaully MaleShep, but that's still funny




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





