Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#68201
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:28
Wrex: Is it? Seems to me that's the same thing the turians want.
Garrus: Except the part about the slaves. And the indoctrination. And destroying the galaxy.
#68202
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:29
Bill Casey wrote...
Shepard: Saren was raising an army of krogan slaves to fight his war. This is different.
Wrex: Is it? Seems to me that's the same thing the turians want.
Garrus: Except the part about the slaves. And the indoctrination. And destroying the galaxy.
#68203
Guest_Paralenko_*
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:29
Guest_Paralenko_*
TJBartlemus wrote...
Paralenko wrote...
Forgive me if I'm stupid.
Why did the catalyst sometimes refer to itself in the 1st person, and sometimes in the 3rd person?
EDIT - Oh, dang it. Misread question. Thought you asked if it did it. Not WHY. So stupid...
Don't worry, I , mis-stated the question... If only you had not responded so promptly I could have edited it in time.
Bye the way... darn you!
Modifié par Paralenko, 16 décembre 2012 - 08:32 .
#68204
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:32
Not stupid at all. My take is that he is most the same entity who consistently speaks like that: Harbinger.Paralenko wrote...
Forgive me if I'm stupid.
Why did the catalyst sometimes refer to the reapers in the 1st person, and sometimes in the 3rd person?
I AM HARBINGER! WE ARE HARBINGER!
#68205
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:32
Bill Casey wrote...
Shepard: Saren was raising an army of krogan slaves to fight his war. This is different.
Wrex: Is it? Seems to me that's the same thing the turians want.
Garrus: Except the part about the slaves. And the indoctrination. And destroying the galaxy.
That last bit is refuse though.
Edit: See! The colours disappeared!
Modifié par BleedingUranium, 16 décembre 2012 - 08:36 .
#68206
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:37
EDI: I am alive. All of us, synthetic and organic, have been changed.
#68207
Guest_Paralenko_*
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:39
Guest_Paralenko_*
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Not stupid at all. My take is that he is most the same entity who consistently speaks like that: Harbinger.Paralenko wrote...
Forgive me if I'm stupid.
Why did the catalyst sometimes refer to the reapers in the 1st person, and sometimes in the 3rd person?
I AM HARBINGER! WE ARE HARBINGER!
So..........
The catalyst is some sort of omniscient douche?
#68208
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:40
*looks at player*
Modifié par Bill Casey, 16 décembre 2012 - 08:41 .
#68209
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:40
Paralenko wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Not stupid at all. My take is that he is most the same entity who consistently speaks like that: Harbinger.Paralenko wrote...
Forgive me if I'm stupid.
Why did the catalyst sometimes refer to the reapers in the 1st person, and sometimes in the 3rd person?
I AM HARBINGER! WE ARE HARBINGER!
So..........
The catalyst is some sort of omniscient douche?
It's generally agreed here that the kid is Harbinger.
#68210
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:41
Bill Casey wrote...
EDI: If the Normandy were captured, my fate would be similar to the indoctrinated. My code would be rewritten. I would become loyal to the Reapers. I would rather become nonfunctional than help them.
EDI: I am alive. All of us, synthetic and organic, have been changed.
Reposting because i just love this quote in regard to Synthesis:
"If you change who someone is, how they think, you have killed them. They will be something new in the same body" - Samara, ME2, Geth Heretic Mission.
#68211
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:43
He likes to think he's omniscient. He is a douche.Paralenko wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Not stupid at all. My take is that he is most the same entity who consistently speaks like that: Harbinger.Paralenko wrote...
Forgive me if I'm stupid.
Why did the catalyst sometimes refer to the reapers in the 1st person, and sometimes in the 3rd person?
I AM HARBINGER! WE ARE HARBINGER!
So..........
The catalyst is some sort of omniscient douche?
#68212
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:44
spotlessvoid wrote...
CmdrShep80 wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
You see nothing; NOTHING!
(Stupid rassum frassum double post.)
Soooo if I see nothing, who's really on top?
Probably Harbinger
I prefer when the girl's on top.
#68213
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:46
From the same mission and used in my Wall of Text™Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
Bill Casey wrote...
EDI: If the Normandy were captured, my fate would be similar to the indoctrinated. My code would be rewritten. I would become loyal to the Reapers. I would rather become nonfunctional than help them.
EDI: I am alive. All of us, synthetic and organic, have been changed.
Reposting because i just love this quote in regard to Synthesis:
"If you change who someone is, how they think, you have killed them. They will be something new in the same body" - Samara, ME2, Geth Heretic Mission.
“That sounds dangerously close to indoctrination, unless there’s something I’m missing.” – Garrus
And perhaps the most applicable, seeing as how synthesis seems to create a utopia:
“If you screwed with my head, made me nod and smile at everything... I’d rather you blew my head off. Let me die as me.” - Jack
#68214
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:48
#68215
Guest_Paralenko_*
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:49
Guest_Paralenko_*
BansheeOwnage wrote...
He likes to think he's omniscient. He is a douche.Paralenko wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Not stupid at all. My take is that he is most the same entity who consistently speaks like that: Harbinger.Paralenko wrote...
Forgive me if I'm stupid.
Why did the catalyst sometimes refer to the reapers in the 1st person, and sometimes in the 3rd person?
I AM HARBINGER! WE ARE HARBINGER!
So..........
The catalyst is some sort of omniscient douche?
I love how your certain its male....
Only a hetero-mansapient could be that convoluted.
Modifié par Paralenko, 16 décembre 2012 - 08:54 .
#68216
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:50
BleedingUranium wrote...
Someone needs to do the same picture with captions: LEFT, CENTER, RIGHT and DESTROY is literally the RIGHT CHOICE.
#68217
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:50
Moar...BansheeOwnage wrote...
From the same mission and used in my Wall of Text™Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
Bill Casey wrote...
EDI: If the Normandy were captured, my fate would be similar to the indoctrinated. My code would be rewritten. I would become loyal to the Reapers. I would rather become nonfunctional than help them.
EDI: I am alive. All of us, synthetic and organic, have been changed.
Reposting because i just love this quote in regard to Synthesis:
"If you change who someone is, how they think, you have killed them. They will be something new in the same body" - Samara, ME2, Geth Heretic Mission.
“That sounds dangerously close to indoctrination, unless there’s something I’m missing.” – Garrus
And perhaps the most applicable, seeing as how synthesis seems to create a utopia:
“If you screwed with my head, made me nod and smile at everything... I’d rather you blew my head off. Let me die as me.” - Jack
Thane: There’s no moral difference between the two. If you change who the Heretics are, you’ve “killed” them. Killed their perspective.
Jacob Taylor: Changing their personality is the same as killing them. Who they are is gone.
Grunt: Kill them or pull their teeth, what’s the difference? They’re killed both ways. Take away their fighting spirit, what else matters?
Kasumi: Either way the Heretics are wiped out. Killed or remade. What’s the difference?
Miranda: Semantics.
Modifié par Bill Casey, 16 décembre 2012 - 08:51 .
#68218
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:52
CmdrShep80 wrote...
Oh I just noticed you can't solo this weekend's medal
How's that? My Valinat VII disagrees.
#68219
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:52
Bill Casey wrote...
Grunt: Kill them or pull their teeth, what’s the difference? They’re killed both ways. Take away their fighting spirit, what else matters?
I think I like this one the best.
#68220
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:54
byne wrote...
Bill Casey wrote...
Grunt: Kill them or pull their teeth, what’s the difference? They’re killed both ways. Take away their fighting spirit, what else matters?
I think I like this one the best.
Yes, because it suggests that by choosing synthesis you kill everyone everywhere in the entire Galaxy for all the times to come.
#68221
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:54
Agreed.Paralenko wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
He likes to think he's omniscient. He is a douche.
I love how your certain its male....
Only a man could be that convoluted.
#68222
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:55
Dem is correct. You can do it solo.demersel wrote...
CmdrShep80 wrote...
Oh I just noticed you can't solo this weekend's medal
How's that? My Valinat VII disagrees.
#68223
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:57
demersel wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
Someone needs to do the same picture with captions: LEFT, CENTER, RIGHT and DESTROY is literally the RIGHT CHOICE.
That's what I was getting at.
#68224
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 08:58

Only one comment
Modifié par BleedingUranium, 16 décembre 2012 - 08:59 .
#68225
Posté 16 décembre 2012 - 09:01
Well, I was there in the room when you posted it, but whatever.BleedingUranium wrote...
It barely needs commenting. It needs to be quoted for truth! Can't argue that destroy isn't the right choice can you? We've got em now!
Edit: Though, no one commented on my Infiltrator ******...
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 16 décembre 2012 - 09:02 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




