80611 réponses à ce sujet

[Rifneno]

Dwailing wrote...

lex0r11 wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

You know, I just had a thought. If it wasn't for Shepard finding that gun and coincidentally being able to carry it all the way to the choice room, he'd never have been able to Destroy the Reapers. He'd have been forced to choose either Control or Synthesis. The more I think about it, the more unlikely the odds of Shepard even having ABILITY to choose Destroy, let alone survive it, seem to become.

My Shepard would've headbutted the SH*T out of those tubes.

Heh, I don't know if that would have worked.  It would be awesome if he could, but I doubt it.

Mine would've picked up starbrat and hurled him at the pipe.

[paxxton]

TJBartlemus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

You know, I just had a thought. If it wasn't for Shepard finding that gun and coincidentally being able to carry it all the way to the choice room, he'd never have been able to Destroy the Reapers. He'd have been forced to choose either Control or Synthesis. The more I think about it, the more unlikely the odds of Shepard even having ABILITY to choose Destroy, let alone survive it, seem to become.

That's indeed a very good catch. He couldn't have punched the tube with bare hands.

He could of...but it would be depressing as you see Shepard beat him/herself to death trying to break it. 

He could start with ****slapping the tube so that it behaves and breaks on its own.

[BansheeOwnage]

paxxton wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

You know, I just had a thought. If it wasn't for Shepard finding that gun and coincidentally being able to carry it all the way to the choice room, he'd never have been able to Destroy the Reapers. He'd have been forced to choose either Control or Synthesis. The more I think about it, the more unlikely the odds of Shepard even having ABILITY to choose Destroy, let alone survive it, seem to become.

That's indeed a very good catch. He couldn't have punched the tube with bare hands.

Holy crap! That's an incredibly good catch!!! It makes no sense!!!

Hey... what if the kid has a Carnifex dispenser? He already made an elevator out of nowhere.

@Pax Now that you mention it, that makes way more sense in a way. Right now there is no good reason to walk into the fire. If you were forced to punch it at least it would kind of make sense.

[Dwailing]

Rifneno wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

lex0r11 wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

You know, I just had a thought. If it wasn't for Shepard finding that gun and coincidentally being able to carry it all the way to the choice room, he'd never have been able to Destroy the Reapers. He'd have been forced to choose either Control or Synthesis. The more I think about it, the more unlikely the odds of Shepard even having ABILITY to choose Destroy, let alone survive it, seem to become.

My Shepard would've headbutted the SH*T out of those tubes.

Heh, I don't know if that would have worked.  It would be awesome if he could, but I doubt it.

Mine would've picked up starbrat and hurled him at the pipe.

I think that would cause the Refusal ending, though...

[jojon2se]

So being condescending towards a Shepard that takes a certain choice, projects nooo attitude towards the player that out of conviction makes that choice for her/him?

Right...

"Why are you hitting yourself? Huh? Why are you hitting yourself?"

[BansheeOwnage]

Rifneno wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

lex0r11 wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

You know, I just had a thought. If it wasn't for Shepard finding that gun and coincidentally being able to carry it all the way to the choice room, he'd never have been able to Destroy the Reapers. He'd have been forced to choose either Control or Synthesis. The more I think about it, the more unlikely the odds of Shepard even having ABILITY to choose Destroy, let alone survive it, seem to become.

My Shepard would've headbutted the SH*T out of those tubes.

Heh, I don't know if that would have worked.  It would be awesome if he could, but I doubt it.

Mine would've picked up starbrat and hurled him at the pipe.

Somehow, you would have found a way. Hmm. I guess that makes the tube an airlock?
@Dwailing Refuse and destroy at once. Pure awesome.

Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 19 décembre 2012 - 12:59 .

[401 Kill]

Isn't the breath scene just completely insane in the literal endings? Let's just assume that the breath scene was possible in the first place. Assume that Shepard somehow could survive the blast from Destroy. He is in the rubble. He takes a breath. Then........credits??? What???

If the Reapers truly were Destroyed, if Shepard truly survived, why not have more? Why not give closure? The Reapers are gone! The galaxy is saved! Why can't we see this through Shepard's eyes? Why can't there be a LI/Squad reunion? Why leave our Avatar to the ME universe buried in the rubble?

In my opinion, there is absolutely NO reason to have this breath scene in Destroy with the literal interpretation. Too many questions. Too many blunders. The only, single, possible way the breath scene could have happened, and have a proper place, would be through the IT lens.

My rant for the day is done.

[paxxton]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

You know, I just had a thought. If it wasn't for Shepard finding that gun and coincidentally being able to carry it all the way to the choice room, he'd never have been able to Destroy the Reapers. He'd have been forced to choose either Control or Synthesis. The more I think about it, the more unlikely the odds of Shepard even having ABILITY to choose Destroy, let alone survive it, seem to become.

That's indeed a very good catch. He couldn't have punched the tube with bare hands.

Holy crap! That's an incredibly good catch!!! It makes no sense!!!

Hey... what if the kid has a Carnifex dispenser? He already made an elevator out of nowhere.

@Pax Now that you mention it, that makes way more sense in a way. Right now there is no good reason to walk into the fire. If you were forced to punch it at least it would kind of make sense.

LOL. But it makes sense that you can only destroy the tube by firing a gun. With out the Predator Destroy wouldn't work.

Modifié par paxxton, 19 décembre 2012 - 01:00 .

[TJBartlemus]

Dwailing wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

lex0r11 wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

You know, I just had a thought. If it wasn't for Shepard finding that gun and coincidentally being able to carry it all the way to the choice room, he'd never have been able to Destroy the Reapers. He'd have been forced to choose either Control or Synthesis. The more I think about it, the more unlikely the odds of Shepard even having ABILITY to choose Destroy, let alone survive it, seem to become.

My Shepard would've headbutted the SH*T out of those tubes.

Heh, I don't know if that would have worked.  It would be awesome if he could, but I doubt it.

Mine would've picked up starbrat and hurled him at the pipe.

I think that would cause the Refusal ending, though...

Shep: F*** This.
Child: SO BE I....wait what the f...

*Shep picks child up, b**** slaps the child, and hurls it at the tube* 

 (Shep then strolls out of there like a bad a**.)

[BansheeOwnage]

401 Kill wrote...

Isn't the breath scene just completely insane in the literal endings? Let's just assume that the breath scene was possible in the first place. Assume that Shepard somehow could survive the blast from Destroy. He is in the rubble. He takes a breath. Then........credits??? What???

If the Reapers truly were Destroyed, if Shepard truly survived, why not have more? Why not give closure? The Reapers are gone! The galaxy is saved! Why can't we see this through Shepard's eyes? Why can't there be a LI/Squad reunion? Why leave our Avatar to the ME universe buried in the rubble?

In my opinion, there is absolutely NO reason to have this breath scene in Destroy with the literal interpretation. Too many questions. Too many blunders. The only, single, possible way the breath scene could have happened, and have a proper place, would be through the IT lens.

As with many things my friend.

[byne]

jojon2se wrote...

So being condescending towards a Shepard that takes a certain choice, projects nooo attitude towards the player that out of conviction makes that choice for her/him?

Right...

"Why are you hitting yourself? Huh? Why are you hitting yourself?"

I can respect a player's reason for choosing refuse. I cannot respect Shepard's reasons for choosing refuse.

[Dwailing]

jojon2se wrote...

So being condescending towards a Shepard that takes a certain choice, projects nooo attitude towards the player that out of conviction makes that choice for her/him?

Right...

"Why are you hitting yourself? Huh? Why are you hitting yourself?"

One thing I've noticed about us (ITists) is that we tend to think of Shepard the character a lot more than Shepard the player's avatar.

[BansheeOwnage]

TJBartlemus wrote...

Shep: F*** This.
Child: SO BE I....wait what the f...

*Shep picks child up, b**** slaps the child, and hurls it at the tube* 

 (Shep then strolls out of there like a bad a**.)

You may have inspired another video. I don't think I could animate throwing him though.

@Dwailing Others need to be able to do that. It pisses me off. They think Shepard does everything they want. Shepard has certain unchangable traits. /rant

Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 19 décembre 2012 - 01:03 .

[Fur28]

Dwailing wrote...

jojon2se wrote...

So being condescending towards a Shepard that takes a certain choice, projects nooo attitude towards the player that out of conviction makes that choice for her/him?

Right...

"Why are you hitting yourself? Huh? Why are you hitting yourself?"

One thing I've noticed about us (ITists) is that we tend to think of Shepard the character a lot more than Shepard the player's avatar.

and if you attack a persons shepard, one shouldn´s be surprised that that person controlling that shepard could feel offended
edit: wait you call yourselfs ITists or ITers?

Modifié par Fur28, 19 décembre 2012 - 01:06 .

[byne]

Fur28 wrote...

edit: wait you call yourselfs ITists or ITers?

Yes.

[TJBartlemus]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

TJBartlemus wrote...

Shep: F*** This.
Child: SO BE I....wait what the f...

*Shep picks child up, b**** slaps the child, and hurls it at the tube* 

 (Shep then strolls out of there like a bad a**.)

You may have inspired another video. I don't think I could animate throwing him though.

@Dwailing Others need to be able to do that. It pisses me off. They think Shepard does everything they want. Shepard has certain unchangable traits. /rant

Commander Shepard. The perfect combination of character and player. (However at times this combination of Player Shep and Character Shep can be separated.)

Anyway...be back later... :happy: 

[401 Kill]

Fur28 wrote...

edit: wait you call yourselfs ITists or ITers?

The long way is "Indoctrination Theorists". The abbreviated way is usually referred to as "ITers".

[Fur28]

byne wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

edit: wait you call yourselfs ITists or ITers?

Yes.

C´mon dont answer question with "yes" i hate it when my friends do that
... and dont you dare anwser to this post with "yes"

[Rifneno]

Fur28 wrote...

byne wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

edit: wait you call yourselfs ITists or ITers?

Yes.

C´mon dont answer question with "yes" i hate it when my friends do that
... and dont you dare anwser to this post with "yes"

Maybe.

[TJBartlemus]

byne wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

edit: wait you call yourselfs ITists or ITers?

Yes.

ITopians. 

ITians. etc... 

[BansheeOwnage]

Fur28 wrote...

byne wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

edit: wait you call yourselfs ITists or ITers?

Yes.

C´mon dont answer question with "yes" i hate it when my friends do that
... and dont you dare anwser to this post with "yes"

We are all geth.

[CoolioThane]

Well we are the Indoctrination Theorists

[jojon2se]

byne wrote...

I can respect a player's reason for choosing refuse. I cannot respect Shepard's reasons for choosing refuse.

In that case you are going to have to provide a non-metagaming explanation for exactly how those differ, without unduly imposing anybody's arbitrary idea of Shepard's mental state, over another's.

I.e: You can't, e.g, cite slouching post-refuse Shepard as an argument.

[Fur28]

CoolioThane wrote...

Well we are the Indoctrination Theorists

with my laziness and english hating autocorrect... nope i need an abreviation

edit: Toppity Tippers

Modifié par Fur28, 19 décembre 2012 - 01:15 .

[CoolioThane]

Shepard the character would never give up.
Player, knowing what we know about the ending, could think Refuse is best.

Different, I.e. I can