spotlessvoid wrote...
You don't risk the entire galaxy because you don't want to have to feel guilt.
Fixed it for you, unless you were doing original FMA then sorry. Hoenheim was a good guy and Pride, if any, would be more like Harbinger. However, you actually feel for the Homunculi while you don't really care about Reapers.BatmanTurian wrote...
Interesting metaphor, but I prefer something you are familiar with.
Shepard=Edward
Catalyst= Father
Harbinger= Pride
Reapers= Homunculi
Modifié par LDS Darth Revan, 21 décembre 2012 - 01:32 .
spotlessvoid wrote...
You don't risk the entire galaxy because you don't want to have to feel guilt. Anyone who sides with a robot race over the human race can start with themselves
I might have confused the two. but you get the idea.LDS Darth Revan wrote...
Fixed it for you. Hoenheim was a good guy and Pride, if any, would be more like Harbinger.BatmanTurian wrote...
Interesting metaphor, but I prefer something you are familiar with.
Shepard=Edward
Catalyst= Father
Harbinger= Pride
Reapers= Homunculi
They do look exactly the same, and you thought that until Father says otherwise, so you're forgiven. And yes, I get the idea because I'm working on a Reapers=Homunculi thread.BatmanTurian wrote...
I might have confused the two. but you get the idea.LDS Darth Revan wrote...
Fixed it for you. Hoenheim was a good guy and Pride, if any, would be more like Harbinger.BatmanTurian wrote...
Interesting metaphor, but I prefer something you are familiar with.
Shepard=Edward
Catalyst= Father
Harbinger= Pride
Reapers= Homunculi
Rifneno wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
You don't risk the entire galaxy because you don't want to have to feel guilt. Anyone who sides with a robot race over the human race can start with themselves
Hell, I'd sacrifice the human race just as quickly as the geth. It's bigger than any one race. It's bigger than the entire cycle. Whatever it takes to destroy the Reapers is worth it.
Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 21 décembre 2012 - 01:34 .
Modifié par LDS Darth Revan, 21 décembre 2012 - 01:35 .
I believe you are 8 hours ahead of me (assuming London time zone). So, the end is supposedly at 1:00AM here, so 9:00AM there.CoolioThane wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
On another note, as far as I heard the world is supposed to end at 1:00 in the morning (where I am). Who wants to
be at the end of the world with me?
How many hours are you from GMT?
Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 21 décembre 2012 - 01:36 .
Thirded. Also DD, Earth is nothing compared to the entire human race or the galaxy.DoomsdayDevice wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
You don't risk the entire galaxy because you don't want to have to feel guilt. Anyone who sides with a robot race over the human race can start with themselves
Hell, I'd sacrifice the human race just as quickly as the geth. It's bigger than any one race. It's bigger than the entire cycle. Whatever it takes to destroy the Reapers is worth it.
Agreed. Even if you had to sacrifice almost the entire galaxy, I'd still do it. Sure, it would be horrible, but if it's the only way it stops...
I'd even sacrifice Earth.
DoomsdayDevice wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
You don't risk the entire galaxy because you don't want to have to feel guilt. Anyone who sides with a robot race over the human race can start with themselves
Hell, I'd sacrifice the human race just as quickly as the geth. It's bigger than any one race. It's bigger than the entire cycle. Whatever it takes to destroy the Reapers is worth it.
Agreed. Even if you had to sacrifice almost the entire galaxy, I'd still do it. Sure, it would be horrible, but if it's the only way it stops...
I'd even sacrifice Earth.
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Thirded. Also DD, Earth is nothing compared to the entire human race or the galaxy.DoomsdayDevice wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
You don't risk the entire galaxy because you don't want to have to feel guilt. Anyone who sides with a robot race over the human race can start with themselves
Hell, I'd sacrifice the human race just as quickly as the geth. It's bigger than any one race. It's bigger than the entire cycle. Whatever it takes to destroy the Reapers is worth it.
Agreed. Even if you had to sacrifice almost the entire galaxy, I'd still do it. Sure, it would be horrible, but if it's the only way it stops...
I'd even sacrifice Earth.
byne wrote...
DoomsdayDevice wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
You don't risk the entire galaxy because you don't want to have to feel guilt. Anyone who sides with a robot race over the human race can start with themselves
Hell, I'd sacrifice the human race just as quickly as the geth. It's bigger than any one race. It's bigger than the entire cycle. Whatever it takes to destroy the Reapers is worth it.
Agreed. Even if you had to sacrifice almost the entire galaxy, I'd still do it. Sure, it would be horrible, but if it's the only way it stops...
I'd even sacrifice Earth.
If the choice was 'sacrifice Earth to destroy the Reapers,' I wouldnt even have to think about it. I think the game banked far too much on people caring about Earth.
BleedingUranium wrote...
In Omega, not taking the three Renegade interrupts is the right thing to do; it shows that you're willing to sacrifice the few for the many and victory.
"Willing" is the important part of that message, because as it turns out, they don't actually die. This is exactly what the Destroy ending is: You show that you're willing to do anything, and that no cost is too great to kill the Reapers.
And as it turns out, it's the only ending where the Reapers die.
byne wrote...
If the choice was 'sacrifice Earth to destroy the Reapers,' I wouldnt even have to think about it. I think the game banked far too much on people caring about Earth.
BleedingUranium wrote...
Personally, I think all the "Take Earth Back" marketing was because that's all we'll be doing in ME3, that's what the post-end content will accomplish, but the rest of the galaxy will still need taking back.
DoomsdayDevice wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
In Omega, not taking the three Renegade interrupts is the right thing to do; it shows that you're willing to sacrifice the few for the many and victory.
"Willing" is the important part of that message, because as it turns out, they don't actually die. This is exactly what the Destroy ending is: You show that you're willing to do anything, and that no cost is too great to kill the Reapers.
And as it turns out, it's the only ending where the Reapers die.
I agree with you, except for the last part. I don't think the Reapers die at all. But yeah, they die in the literal interpretation, if that is what you meant.
DoomsdayDevice wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Thirded. Also DD, Earth is nothing compared to the entire human race or the galaxy.
Yeah of course, I posted that in the wrong order. I assumed people would realize that.
byne wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
Personally, I think all the "Take Earth Back" marketing was because that's all we'll be doing in ME3, that's what the post-end content will accomplish, but the rest of the galaxy will still need taking back.
Still, the focus on Earth is one of my biggest problems with the game. Up until the Reapers move the Citadel there, we have no legitimate reason for focusing on Earth to the detriment of every other part of the galaxy. Palaven went to **** at around the same time, but we dont gather fleets to take it back.
Earth really has no strategic importance, yet all the fleets gather behind you to take it back, just because thats what the trailer told them to do.
BleedingUranium wrote...
DoomsdayDevice wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
In Omega, not taking the three Renegade interrupts is the right thing to do; it shows that you're willing to sacrifice the few for the many and victory.
"Willing" is the important part of that message, because as it turns out, they don't actually die. This is exactly what the Destroy ending is: You show that you're willing to do anything, and that no cost is too great to kill the Reapers.
And as it turns out, it's the only ending where the Reapers die.
I agree with you, except for the last part. I don't think the Reapers die at all. But yeah, they die in the literal interpretation, if that is what you meant.
Sorry, I meant in a literal end. But that's all Shepard knows because he doesn't know it's an illusion. Again, willingness.
DoomsdayDevice wrote...
byne wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
Personally, I think all the "Take Earth Back" marketing was because that's all we'll be doing in ME3, that's what the post-end content will accomplish, but the rest of the galaxy will still need taking back.
Still, the focus on Earth is one of my biggest problems with the game. Up until the Reapers move the Citadel there, we have no legitimate reason for focusing on Earth to the detriment of every other part of the galaxy. Palaven went to **** at around the same time, but we dont gather fleets to take it back.
Earth really has no strategic importance, yet all the fleets gather behind you to take it back, just because thats what the trailer told them to do.
No, it's because it's where we need to go in order to hook up the Crucible to the Citadel.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
