This^^
Thanks for expressing it better than I could.
Returning to the example of Indy in the fridge - the point Byne was making, IsaacShep, was that people DIDN'T accept it. Despite the fact that Indiana Jones is a fantasy adventure series, with no pretensions towards being realistic.
Indy had previously encountered a chest full of face-melting demons, an evil priest capable of ripping out a person's still beating heart and showing it to them, and a cup capable of making folks immortal. Yet the infamous fridge was the point were the fans drew the line in the sand. That scene was universally derided. It even became a meme, synonymous with "Jumping the Shark" to describe the moment when a series fell off a cliff.
Mass Effect is a series with a different tone altogether. It has aspirations of being, if not exactly "Hard" Sci-fi, at least reasonably "firm" sci-fi. It has well thought out explanations for it's more fanciful elements, like eezo and biotics. It even went to the trouble of explaining how we can hear explosions in space. There's a scene where Steve explains that ships are fitted with "acoustic simulators" to make explosions seem more psychologically real to pilots.
Yet at the climax of the series, the literal interpretation asks for leaps of faith which would raise eyebrows in Harry Freaking Potter!
First Harbinger politely waits while Shepard says goodbye to his Crew.
Then he manages to miss his arch-nemesis Shepard, despite being perfectly capable of vaporising everyone else on the beam run, and Shepard being prone on the ground after tripping over.
He then flies off leaving the Reaper's greatest weakness completely unguarded apart from 3 husks and a marauder.
The beam then conveniently drops Shepard off, a mere 5 minute's stroll from the control panel, in the entire vast expanse of the citadel.
Finally Shepard survives the mother of all explosions, despite having no shields, no armor, or even a bloody fridge to hide in!
There's a reason the expression "Truth is stranger than fiction" is a cliche. People will accept all manner of unlikely events with the disclaimer "based on a true story" - like the examples IsaacShep made of people surviving the September 11th attacks.
However they are, perversely, much less likely to be forgiving of works of fiction - and any competant writer knows this. It may well be possible to survive a nuclear explosion of a certain yield, at a certain distance, in a fridge with a certain thickness of lead lining it (although seriously, who makes a fridge with lead?). But you don't write it into your story unless you want it to be a laughing stock.
Bioware have previously produced some of the best writing in gaming, even in the earlier parts of ME3. They appear to be intelligent, responsible adults, allowed to do things like vote, and drive cars, and use a pair of scissors while unsupervised. I cannot believe they intended the literal end of this story to be definitive. I suppose you could call this the "argument from unbelievability".
Anyway, rant over.
Modifié par Eryri, 23 décembre 2012 - 12:36 .