BlazingZephyr wrote...
A very valid point.
What's sad is that there is all of this stuff that points to IT, but I seriously doubt any of it was intended. It may have been a previous idea, but it was probably not the intended result. I just hope Mac'n'friends would see how easy it could be to make these retarded endings a hundred times more logical with a simple twist and possible cliffhanger.
Leviathan is my last hope for this franchise. It has so much potential and I'd hate to see it squandered, like the Extended Cut's was. I'd love to see just ONE clear FACT pointing to indoctrination. I'm so sick of interpretation and speculation. If they just added one thing to give me hope, I might keep the faith long enough to see all of the DLC in hopes of witnessing ME3's redemption.
[solemn annoyed vent/]
IT has plenty of facts. The clearest IMO is the "TIM" eyes Shepard gets if he picks control or synthesis. TIM got those eyes from an artifact called the Arca Monolith which was hyper-indoctrinating everyone that came in contact with it. The Arca Monolith is the
only known source of those eye modifications and it was beyond a shadow of a doubt a device that enslaved people into Reaper control. Literalists grasp at straws and claim that the process for conversion into taking the Catalyst's place just happens to involve the exact same process as enslaving the organic. Starbinger himself even claims that your corporeal form will be destroyed. That means Shepard's physical body will be destroyed utterly. Why make these modifications if it's just going to be dust in a moment? And are we to believe that not only does taking the Catalyst's place involve that same process, but whatever the hell synthesis is does too?! No. There's only one logical explanation for the eyes. Control and synthesis are Shepard being tricked into indoctrination.
I'm not gushing with faith that Bioware plans to reveal IT in the forseeable future, if at all. Remember when they tweeted "How long did it take to find out Deckard was a replicant?" It took twenty frickin' years. I am, however, quite sure that IT was intentional. There's simply too many things pointing to it. Some are weak, some are strong. But there's too many, especially of the strong ones, for it to be by accident.
MaximizedAction wrote...
But never ever did I come to the conclusion that the kid in the beginning was actually real. If Bioware didn't want hat to be ambiguous they wouldn't have made the vent scene look the way it did, it's how to hint and portray a non-real character 101.
Exactly. And it was obvious long before we saw the ending. When we got the demo and the only thing we knew of the game was Vancouver, the forum was full of "that kid's not real" posts. That's very telling. As is the fact that they left everything that made people question it. If he was ever supposed to be real, why wouldn't they do something, even something minor, to indicate that he's real?
Shut up, hanar.