Dr_Extrem wrote...
byne wrote...
Jade8aby88 wrote...
70's and 80's.. But I don't think it's as different as you think, sure the time gap isn't as long (in fact it's rEAl short) but a lot of people considered ME this generations Star Wars, I know I did for a time. Pre-ME3.
Also, I don't like how much the IT rides on the breath scene. A lot of people know that indoctrination was a validd thought even before seeing that. People speculated it about the kid in the demo. So I get kind of frustrated whenever people point to the breath scene as IT's most compelling evidence, because I don't think it is.
People point to the breath scene because, if the endings are literal, theres no way to explain it.
sure .. the crucible was intact enough to target synthetic life only - ais.
the geth, edi and the reapers were killed. shepard is only part synthetic - implants, who have only a supporting role. shepard can survive without them - maybe not for long but enough for the scene.
shepard just wakes up on the citadel.
the epilogue is not in chronological order. at least not the slides. showing shepards breath before the memorial scene, would be anticlimactic. everybody would know, why the li does not put the plate on the wall, if they would have seen the breathe scene before. the breathe scene is shown (in the ec), to explain the lis behaviour.
the scene can be explained and makes sense - even without IT
Nowhere on the Citadel is there concrete. The Citadel was destroyed. Shepard was at the epicenter of the gigantic explosion, already badly wounded. Shepard somehow survived.
That cant be explained literally in a way that makes any sense.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut









