byne wrote...
BlazingZephyr wrote...
I like what Legion says if you keep the base: "Unity. Transcendence. Now you possess the knowledge yourselves. We hope you do not use it. Your species has much potential. You should build your own future."
In a Literal sense:
Destroy - Organics and future synthetics build their own future.
Control - The Shepalyst builds the galaxy's future for them, using the Reapers.
Synthesis - Shepard accepts the Catalyst's ideal, "inevitable" future.
Refuse - Shepard refuses to sacrifice EDI and the Geth or accept the Reapers' ideals, causing the cycle to fail. This, however, allows the next cycle to plot its own course, free from the influence of the Reapers.
I still dont see how the refuse ending works.
That cycle acts like they never had a war with the Reapers, they just went and built the Crucible and used it during peace time.
The Reapers would be out of range of the Crucible, safely in darkspace, just biding their time while the current cycle thinks itself safe.
I was gonna expand on that, but I had to go do something. Refuse could use some work, but it would make no sense if the next cycle used the crucible,since Liara's beacon told them it didn't work.
However, my main question about Refuse is how Liara kept the reapers from the beacons. She would have had to survive through the entire extiction, then plant the beacon. The Reapers scour the galaxy for ANYTHING warning the next cycle. The prothean beacons only worked because a small team survived over a century of stasis and sent a desparate message to tell any survivors about Ilos. The reapers would have been extra thorough with our Cycle, considering how the Protheans screwed things up so much.
In other words, Liara's beacon couldn't have actually made it to the next cycle. Speculations... NOW!
Modifié par BlazingZephyr, 09 août 2012 - 12:21 .