masster blaster wrote...
DoomsdayDevice wrote...
masster blaster wrote...
DoomsdayDevice wrote...
masster, I can't help but notice your spelling, grammar and formatting have improved considerably.
Is that really you?
Yes it's me, and are you DD?
Of course!
Was there ever any doubt?
You doubt that I was me, so I returned the favor.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
They seem to pick the best of what the Cycle has to offer. And as the Guardian and Levy said they are experimenting.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Then why bother harvesting individual species?MegumiAzusa wrote...
How should I know? Impracticality maybe. Also there is the difference between all organic life, as in every living thing and microbe and what not (which they clearly don't care about), and all organic life, as in organic life in general.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Doesn't stop it from being a bad idea. Plus, they put species into destroyers, which are destroyed frequently. Why not put them somewhere safe, like the hypothesized Evil-Citadel?MegumiAzusa wrote...
But it's already consistent. The devs said more then once that usually no Reaper is ever destroyed in a Cycle.BansheeOwnage wrote...
I don't usually preserve life by putting them into starships, but when I do, I use them as cannon fodder.
As you can see on the screenshot which is quoted there are still lights on.masster blaster wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
And in the EC you can see lights on the frakked up Citadel. It's still not impossible.masster blaster wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Thing is: the explosion is still originating from the Crucible. The other secondary explosions are originating from the Citadel. The Citadel is only damaged at the parts where the secondary explosions occurs, but everything engulfed by the one you pointed at is fine. There are at least 4 elevators in the Guardian scene.nightcobra8928 wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Uhm you make a point about removing everything impossible, then go on to say Shep on the Citadel is merely improbable because of "there's a very good chance [of equipment failure]" which doesn't say it's impossible.nightcobra8928 wrote...
i'll go with the tried and true route of "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
Let's assume that shepard's breath scene is on the citadel...taking into account that shepard had no shields and armor as well being badly wounded, the blast from the citadel's explosion gives a 100% guarantee that anything alive near shepard's vicinity would be turned into a crisp, if not vaporized entirely.
If by some freak chance shepard manages to survive we have to take into account that the citadel blew up and got torn apart so there's a very good chance that whatever equipment keeps the place shepard's in breathable and pressurized condition is malfunctioning or even deactivated leaving shepard's barely alive body at the mercy of space's vaccum.
Now then let's move on to the possibility that the breath scene takes place on earth...if shepard was indeed on the citadel and then was thrown towards earth due to the explosion, then we hit the same wall as in the first point, point being that shepard has a 0% chance of survival under those conditions and the ones before mentioned like lack of any shields or armor. like we've seen in ME2, shepard *died* due to the reentry damage and in that scenario shepard had a full suit of shielded armor as well as lacked a citadel sized explosion proppeling shepard into orbit.
Then the only scenario in which the breath scene Can occur is if shepard never left earth at all.
well to me, i'm 100% certain that any electronic equipment near shepard is fried based on this picture
other people might say otherwise, though for me it's pretty clear that no type of equipment would be running after that.
You forget that in Destroy technology is effected. That includes all
tech on the Citadel. sure in high ems Destroy the ships are moving,
but their engines are flickering. Also that mean the shields on the
Citadel are down, or turning on and off meaning oxygen is going out into space. I doubt they could get everything back and running on the Citadel in time.
Yet at what time is this? I mean it's flash foward. For all we know it's been a year already when we see the f'd up Citadel again.
experimenting is not a sound method of preserving life, what if their experiments went wrong (you could argue they already have)MegumiAzusa wrote...
They seem to pick the best of what the Cycle has to offer. And as the Guardian and Levy said they are experimenting.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Then why bother harvesting individual species?MegumiAzusa wrote...
How should I know? Impracticality maybe. Also there is the difference between all organic life, as in every living thing and microbe and what not (which they clearly don't care about), and all organic life, as in organic life in general.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Doesn't stop it from being a bad idea. Plus, they put species into destroyers, which are destroyed frequently. Why not put them somewhere safe, like the hypothesized Evil-Citadel?MegumiAzusa wrote...
But it's already consistent. The devs said more then once that usually no Reaper is ever destroyed in a Cycle.BansheeOwnage wrote...
I don't usually preserve life by putting them into starships, but when I do, I use them as cannon fodder.
Rosewind wrote...
Pascal219 wrote...
So I was play a multiplayer game and I usually pick silver, but I keep noticing the banner for silver! All the banners in MP have been used in the game except the banner for the silver challenge.
It's a cropped version of this picture:
So how was this never used in game? It's awesome! And why use it in the silver challenge banner??
Or is this something still to come in the upcoming Citadel DLC?
Nah, it was just concept art they decided to use honestly. We been over that one a few times
Rifneno wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Why are we even discussing this? Leviathans are nowhere near big enough to do that.
You mean the size difference between a Reaper capital ship and a Leviathan? I'm not sure... The ones we saw were enormous but I'm not sure how big exactly. It's hard to get a measurement because we have very little point of reference. Shepard's in an atlas (I like how Shepard will recognize it as an atlas even if he's never seen an atlas because you're there before Sur'Kesh), which is about the only thing we can judge by. We can't tell exactly how far off the Leviathans are. Plus, doesn't being underwater mess with your depth perception?
... Also, the grammar **** in me has to wonder if "capital ship" is supposed to be capitalized.
401 Kill wrote...
After the last squaddie conversations, it just goes downhill. The mission turns into straight combat for 30mins literally moving area to area, having no objectives, even the missile part is just surviving waves of enemies.lex0r11 wrote...
Just makes me angry every time when I see artwork and situations that could've been.
Priority Earth is such a joke.
You would think that the most important mission of the game would be spectacular, but nothing is spectacular about Priority Earth.
It's what Harbinger tells you about the other species. They seem to be unfit for Reaperfication, so they pick the one best suited to their needs.BansheeOwnage wrote...
So they do care about individual organic species.MegumiAzusa wrote...
They seem to pick the best of what the Cycle has to offer. And as the Guardian and Levy said they are experimenting.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Then why bother harvesting individual species?MegumiAzusa wrote...
How should I know? Impracticality maybe. Also there is the difference between all organic life, as in every living thing and microbe and what not (which they clearly don't care about), and all organic life, as in organic life in general.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Doesn't stop it from being a bad idea. Plus, they put species into destroyers, which are destroyed frequently. Why not put them somewhere safe, like the hypothesized Evil-Citadel?MegumiAzusa wrote...
But it's already consistent. The devs said more then once that usually no Reaper is ever destroyed in a Cycle.BansheeOwnage wrote...
I don't usually preserve life by putting them into starships, but when I do, I use them as cannon fodder.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
As you can see on the screenshot which is quoted there are still lights on.masster blaster wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
And in the EC you can see lights on the frakked up Citadel. It's still not impossible.masster blaster wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Thing is: the explosion is still originating from the Crucible. The other secondary explosions are originating from the Citadel. The Citadel is only damaged at the parts where the secondary explosions occurs, but everything engulfed by the one you pointed at is fine. There are at least 4 elevators in the Guardian scene.nightcobra8928 wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Uhm you make a point about removing everything impossible, then go on to say Shep on the Citadel is merely improbable because of "there's a very good chance [of equipment failure]" which doesn't say it's impossible.nightcobra8928 wrote...
i'll go with the tried and true route of "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
Let's assume that shepard's breath scene is on the citadel...taking into account that shepard had no shields and armor as well being badly wounded, the blast from the citadel's explosion gives a 100% guarantee that anything alive near shepard's vicinity would be turned into a crisp, if not vaporized entirely.
If by some freak chance shepard manages to survive we have to take into account that the citadel blew up and got torn apart so there's a very good chance that whatever equipment keeps the place shepard's in breathable and pressurized condition is malfunctioning or even deactivated leaving shepard's barely alive body at the mercy of space's vaccum.
Now then let's move on to the possibility that the breath scene takes place on earth...if shepard was indeed on the citadel and then was thrown towards earth due to the explosion, then we hit the same wall as in the first point, point being that shepard has a 0% chance of survival under those conditions and the ones before mentioned like lack of any shields or armor. like we've seen in ME2, shepard *died* due to the reentry damage and in that scenario shepard had a full suit of shielded armor as well as lacked a citadel sized explosion proppeling shepard into orbit.
Then the only scenario in which the breath scene Can occur is if shepard never left earth at all.
well to me, i'm 100% certain that any electronic equipment near shepard is fried based on this picture
other people might say otherwise, though for me it's pretty clear that no type of equipment would be running after that.
You forget that in Destroy technology is effected. That includes all
tech on the Citadel. sure in high ems Destroy the ships are moving,
but their engines are flickering. Also that mean the shields on the
Citadel are down, or turning on and off meaning oxygen is going out into space. I doubt they could get everything back and running on the Citadel in time.
Yet at what time is this? I mean it's flash foward. For all we know it's been a year already when we see the f'd up Citadel again.
And that is after the destruction ray.
Your squadmates also know what Banshees are and call them out like they're used to see them. It's because the earliest you're supposed to do Leviathan is after the AY Monastery.
I can't see a reason why I should mistrust 2 independent sources if they tell me the same.masster blaster wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
They seem to pick the best of what the Cycle has to offer. And as the Guardian and Levy said they are experimenting.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Then why bother harvesting individual species?MegumiAzusa wrote...
How should I know? Impracticality maybe. Also there is the difference between all organic life, as in every living thing and microbe and what not (which they clearly don't care about), and all organic life, as in organic life in general.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Doesn't stop it from being a bad idea. Plus, they put species into destroyers, which are destroyed frequently. Why not put them somewhere safe, like the hypothesized Evil-Citadel?MegumiAzusa wrote...
But it's already consistent. The devs said more then once that usually no Reaper is ever destroyed in a Cycle.BansheeOwnage wrote...
I don't usually preserve life by putting them into starships, but when I do, I use them as cannon fodder.
And you believe them? Do you believe that TIM is right. That Saren is right, or other Indoctrinated agents?
MegumiAzusa wrote...
I can't see a reason why I should mistrust 2 independent sources if they tell me the same.masster blaster wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
They seem to pick the best of what the Cycle has to offer. And as the Guardian and Levy said they are experimenting.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Then why bother harvesting individual species?MegumiAzusa wrote...
How should I know? Impracticality maybe. Also there is the difference between all organic life, as in every living thing and microbe and what not (which they clearly don't care about), and all organic life, as in organic life in general.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Doesn't stop it from being a bad idea. Plus, they put species into destroyers, which are destroyed frequently. Why not put them somewhere safe, like the hypothesized Evil-Citadel?MegumiAzusa wrote...
But it's already consistent. The devs said more then once that usually no Reaper is ever destroyed in a Cycle.BansheeOwnage wrote...
I don't usually preserve life by putting them into starships, but when I do, I use them as cannon fodder.
And you believe them? Do you believe that TIM is right. That Saren is right, or other Indoctrinated agents?
MegumiAzusa wrote...
I can't see a reason why I should mistrust 2 independent sources if they tell me the same.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
I can't see a reason why I should mistrust 2 independent sources if they tell me the same.
So you're saying the lights, which are exactly like the streets etc you see before are reflections or explosions (which are steady, completely unlike explosions)? That's even more weird.masster blaster wrote...
Explosions are happening INSIDE the Citadel. Also reflection of the SUN. Metal can reflect sunlight.
Modifié par MegumiAzusa, 02 janvier 2013 - 12:04 .
It's true. A lot of people freak out the first time they see me.Rifneno wrote...
Your squadmates also know what Banshees are and call them out like they're used to see them. It's because the earliest you're supposed to do Leviathan is after the AY Monastery.
Yeah, that too. I love that they still freak out the "first" time they see one too.
If we don't trust the creator of the Reapers, how can we trust the creator of the creator of the Reapers?BleedingUranium wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
I can't see a reason why I should mistrust 2 independent sources if they tell me the same.
Because they're villains? Saren and TIM could be considered two independent sources too, but you don't see me trusting them.
401 Kill wrote...
Welcome back Blur! You have been freed!!
Yes welcome back!401 Kill wrote...
Welcome back Blur! You have been freed!!
MegumiAzusa wrote...
So you're saying the lights, which are exactly like the streets etc you see before are reflections or explosions (which are steady, completely unlike explosions)? That's even more weird.masster blaster wrote...
Explosions are happening INSIDE the Citadel. Also reflection of the SUN. Metal can reflect sunlight.
I am unable to understand your grammar.masster blaster wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
I can't see a reason why I should mistrust 2 independent sources if they tell me the same.masster blaster wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
They seem to pick the best of what the Cycle has to offer. And as the Guardian and Levy said they are experimenting.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Then why bother harvesting individual species?MegumiAzusa wrote...
How should I know? Impracticality maybe. Also there is the difference between all organic life, as in every living thing and microbe and what not (which they clearly don't care about), and all organic life, as in organic life in general.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Doesn't stop it from being a bad idea. Plus, they put species into destroyers, which are destroyed frequently. Why not put them somewhere safe, like the hypothesized Evil-Citadel?MegumiAzusa wrote...
But it's already consistent. The devs said more then once that usually no Reaper is ever destroyed in a Cycle.BansheeOwnage wrote...
I don't usually preserve life by putting them into starships, but when I do, I use them as cannon fodder.
And you believe them? Do you believe that TIM is right. That Saren is right, or other Indoctrinated agents?
Meg that is like saying. I know this is real life right here you would believe in Hitler.
Yes.Rifneno wrote...
I want a DLC where I can kill all the Reapers by tricking the Catalyst into trying to divide by zero.
I might be wrong here, but I don't think synthesis has an elevator.MegumiAzusa wrote...
And yes 4 elevators, 1 for each choice, and the 1 transporting Shep up.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
