MaximizedAction wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
Also, damnit, how did we not have this pic posted during the holidays?
Actually I wanted to post it but remembered that we had it in Mark II, I think. But I might be wrong. Oh well, it is now.
Modifié par demersel, 02 janvier 2013 - 10:55 .
Guest_magnetite_*
Dwailing wrote...
Of course it's not going to be all sad and tearful. If it's an IT reveal, we're going to be, to quote Kaidan in the Gamer Poop video, "Dancing in the streets, hugging and ****ing." OK, that last part might not be accurate, but the rest it is.
Dwailing wrote...
hermiona15 wrote...
About that tweet "High potential for tears". Well, you all probably know it aleady, but Hulick said himself that this DLC is not going to be all sad and tearful:
MDesigner wrote...
"Actually, tweets are not regulated in the way that you've described. We are just expected to exercise caution and respect non-disclosure agreements. I made one comment about just one particular piece of music being sad, and now the entire DLC is sadness apparently (not true). Obviously I didn't reveal any details about the DLC itself and no harm was done, but it's frustrating to be misquoted, so since then I've toned down my comments on the DLC until after it's fully announced and/or launched. Lesson learned!"
Of course it's not going to be all sad and tearful. If it's an IT reveal, we're going to be, to quote Kaidan in the Gamer Poop video, "Dancing in the streets, hugging and ****ing." OK, that last part might not be accurate, but the rest it is.
magnetite wrote...
Dwailing wrote...
Of course it's not going to be all sad and tearful. If it's an IT reveal, we're going to be, to quote Kaidan in the Gamer Poop video, "Dancing in the streets, hugging and ****ing." OK, that last part might not be accurate, but the rest it is.
Do you think if the DLC is an IT reveal that it will basically silence everyone on the forum and have them go "oh, so the ending was an indoctrination attempt after all" or will they react "Bioware copied the whole IT thing and used it as their own..."? I don't know how it'll turn out, but it would be interesting to see how people react to it.
depends how good it is, i still think a new ending would be enough to get the majority of people on board but thats just memagnetite wrote...
Dwailing wrote...
Of course it's not going to be all sad and tearful. If it's an IT reveal, we're going to be, to quote Kaidan in the Gamer Poop video, "Dancing in the streets, hugging and ****ing." OK, that last part might not be accurate, but the rest it is.
Do you think if the DLC is an IT reveal that it will basically silence everyone on the forum and have them go "oh, so the ending was an indoctrination attempt after all" or will they react "Bioware copied the whole IT thing and used it as their own..."? I don't know how it'll turn out, but it would be interesting to see how people react to it.
Modifié par umadcommander, 02 janvier 2013 - 11:03 .
Guest_magnetite_*
umadcommander wrote...
depends how good it is, i still think a new ending would be enough to get the majority of people on board but thats just me
Ah that'll be interesting if they do that. They will need to do a really
good job on that to show that they did, in fact, planned this way
before IT was created. Let's see what they'll add.
Modifié par magnetite, 02 janvier 2013 - 11:08 .
magnetite wrote...
Dwailing wrote...
Of course it's not going to be all sad and tearful. If it's an IT reveal, we're going to be, to quote Kaidan in the Gamer Poop video, "Dancing in the streets, hugging and ****ing." OK, that last part might not be accurate, but the rest it is.
Do you think if the DLC is an IT reveal that it will basically silence everyone on the forum and have them go "oh, so the ending was an indoctrination attempt after all" or will they react "Bioware copied the whole IT thing and used it as their own..."? I don't know how it'll turn out, but it would be interesting to see how people react to it.
i didnt mean a rewrite i meant *see bolded part of your statement*magnetite wrote...
umadcommander wrote...
depends how good it is, i still think a new ending would be enough to get the majority of people on board but thats just me
Ending rewrite ain't gonna happen. After all, call me nuts, but that's like trying to create the ending in the "fans vision" of the game instead of the creator's (Bioware).Ah that'll be interesting if they do that. They will need to do a really
good job on that to show that they did, in fact, planned this way
before IT was created. Let's see what they'll add.
Shepard wakes up and destroys the Reapers for real would be my guess.
They've had hints of indoctrination going back to 2007 or so, and before that (Final Hours talked about a master race enslaving a lesser one, from 2004)
Modifié par draconian139, 02 janvier 2013 - 11:32 .
masster blaster wrote...
After a few hours away from the IT thread, I am back to my self. Still feel bad, but what is done is done. So Anything new?
I see.Norlond wrote...
masster blaster wrote...
After a few hours away from the IT thread, I am back to my self. Still feel bad, but what is done is done. So Anything new?
We have a new mascot
draconian139 wrote...
I just can't see EA letting them do all this if it was planned from the beginning. I believed that IT was intended and that they'd release content explaining everything up until they released the EC. I still view an indoctrination attempt as the most reasonable interpretation of the ending but I don't think that we'll get DLC pointing out the truth of it. I'd love to be wrong though :-).
Guest_magnetite_*
draconian139 wrote...
I just can't see EA letting them do all this if it was planned from the beginning. I believed that IT was intended and that they'd release content explaining everything up until they released the EC. I still view an indoctrination attempt as the most reasonable interpretation of the ending but I don't think that we'll get DLC pointing out the truth of it. I'd love to be wrong though :-).
Modifié par magnetite, 02 janvier 2013 - 11:43 .
I made points like hundreds of pages ago as to why Refuse is the best ending.Mr.Racoon wrote...
Guys, guys, c'mon.
We all know the destroy ending is the best ending, right?
while people may not agree on the best ending i think we can all agree synthesis is by far the worstTheProtheans wrote...
I made points like hundreds of pages ago as to why Refuse is the best ending.Mr.Racoon wrote...
Guys, guys, c'mon.
We all know the destroy ending is the best ending, right?
Destroy along with Synthesis and Control are bad endings.
In the comics, the Comedian and Moloch were in Cuba when that happened, they were sad:crying:demersel wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
Have you guys accused Hackett of shooting JFK yet?
Don't be silly. We all know that It was the Comedian, who shot the JFK.
Fixed.AxStapleton wrote...
Whatever they do with this DLC, someone will be upset. That's the No.1 fact and unwritten rule ofBSNthe world.
Yeah, they're all varying degrees of bad, including destroy. At least literally.umadcommander wrote...
while people may not agree on the best ending i think we can all agree synthesis is by far the worstTheProtheans wrote...
I made points like hundreds of pages ago as to why Refuse is the best ending.Mr.Racoon wrote...
Guys, guys, c'mon.
We all know the destroy ending is the best ending, right?
Destroy along with Synthesis and Control are bad endings.
Destroy>Refuse>Control>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Synthesis:whistle:BansheeOwnage wrote...
Yeah, they're all varying degrees of bad, including destroy. At least literally.umadcommander wrote...
while people may not agree on the best ending i think we can all agree synthesis is by far the worstTheProtheans wrote...
I made points like hundreds of pages ago as to why Refuse is the best ending.Mr.Racoon wrote...
Guys, guys, c'mon.
We all know the destroy ending is the best ending, right?
Destroy along with Synthesis and Control are bad endings.
Modifié par umadcommander, 03 janvier 2013 - 12:01 .
TheProtheans wrote...
I made points like hundreds of pages ago as to why Refuse is the best ending.Mr.Racoon wrote...
Guys, guys, c'mon.
We all know the destroy ending is the best ending, right?
Destroy along with Synthesis and Control are bad endings.
This is exactly what I always though/still think the end of ME3 should be like. You'd really know your choices/efforts mattered. The best ending should be harder than this to get! It would be so satisfying.Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
demersel wrote...
re-watch the final dialoge with him - "conrad, why did you do that?" ))))
there you have perfect forshadowing of the IT reveal. If Conrad Verner can have a happy ending - Shepard sure can and will have it too.
And what i find even more fitting is that only a completionist will get everything out of Conrad. Beside his survival beeing based on a ME1 decision, his asset also scales with the number of Matriarch writings from ME1 you found, up to 10. Getting those means you explored just about everything in ME1.
Simply put, but accurate.umadcommander wrote...
Destroy>Refuse>Control>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Synthesis:whistle:
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 03 janvier 2013 - 12:04 .
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
