80611 réponses à ce sujet

[ElSuperGecko]

Rosewind wrote...
That's no Koala that is a drop bear mate!

Look up, stay alive.  Better yet, make sure you wear a pointy hat. 

[dorktainian]

BleedingUranium wrote...

dorktainian wrote...

also.... fwiw (although nobody will probably take any notice) We assume Shep is indoctrinated and everything happening around him is a result of this, but then assume the choices presented are literal choices? That does not make any sense. surely the choices would also be misleading?

He's not indoctrinated.

then everything happening around him should be literal?  can't have it both ways.  he either is or isnt.  

Modifié par dorktainian, 07 janvier 2013 - 04:13 .

[demersel]

dorktainian wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

dorktainian wrote...

also.... fwiw (although nobody will probably take any notice) We assume Shep is indoctrinated and everything happening around him is a result of this, but then assume the choices presented are literal choices? That does not make any sense. surely the choices would also be misleading?

He's not indoctrinated.

then everything happening around him should be literal?  can't have it both ways.  he either is or isnt.  

How much do you need to drink before you start seeing things and are unable to stand straight? One drop? 

[draconian139]

dorktainian wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

dorktainian wrote...

also.... fwiw (although nobody will probably take any notice) We assume Shep is indoctrinated and everything happening around him is a result of this, but then assume the choices presented are literal choices? That does not make any sense. surely the choices would also be misleading?

He's not indoctrinated.

then everything happening around him should be literal?  can't have it both ways.  he either is or isnt.  

No, its an indoctrination attempt and is how his mind is making sense of it.  If he was indoctrinated he would have already killed Hackett or something.

[dorktainian]

demersel wrote...

dorktainian wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

dorktainian wrote...

also.... fwiw (although nobody will probably take any notice) We assume Shep is indoctrinated and everything happening around him is a result of this, but then assume the choices presented are literal choices? That does not make any sense. surely the choices would also be misleading?

He's not indoctrinated.

then everything happening around him should be literal?  can't have it both ways.  he either is or isnt.  

How much do you need to drink before you start seeing things and are unable to stand straight? One drop? 

but IT says shep is in an illusionary mind battle with a reaper, and then you have to make a literal choice at the end?  seriously?    

Back later... speculations.  

Modifié par dorktainian, 07 janvier 2013 - 04:17 .

[BleedingUranium]

dorktainian wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

dorktainian wrote...

also.... fwiw (although nobody will probably take any notice) We assume Shep is indoctrinated and everything happening around him is a result of this, but then assume the choices presented are literal choices? That does not make any sense. surely the choices would also be misleading?

He's not indoctrinated.

then everything happening around him should be literal?  can't have it both ways.  he either is or isnt.  

That's not how indoctrination works. Shepard is undergoing the process of indoctrination, but is not indoctrinated. It's the difference between dying and being dead.

We might as well replace every use of the word "indoctrination" with "brainwashing", because they really are identical. It too is a process, but there comes a point, an infinitely small point in time, where you finally snap and become indoctrinated/brainwashed.

Modifié par BleedingUranium, 07 janvier 2013 - 04:20 .

[dorktainian]

fair do's. still think there's more to this that simply the 'choice'..

speculations.

[demersel]

dorktainian wrote...

demersel wrote...

dorktainian wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

dorktainian wrote...

also.... fwiw (although nobody will probably take any notice) We assume Shep is indoctrinated and everything happening around him is a result of this, but then assume the choices presented are literal choices? That does not make any sense. surely the choices would also be misleading?

He's not indoctrinated.

then everything happening around him should be literal?  can't have it both ways.  he either is or isnt.  

How much do you need to drink before you start seeing things and are unable to stand straight? One drop? 

but IT says shep is in an illusionary mind battle with a reaper, and then you have to make a literal choice at the end?  seriously?  

It is not literal. It doesn't do what it says it would do. Destroy doesn't destroy all the reapers in the universe, Control doesn't turn you into the Guardian. controlling all the reapers, Synthesis doesn't  fuse everyliving thing in the universe with tech, even refuse is not doing nothing, while standing and watching the galaxy to die (as much as you'd want that, but sadly, no it isn't). What literal is there about any of those???

[McGrzegorz]

Uhhuuu,

I don't if it is legit... but..
Manveer Heir ‏@[/s]manveerheir[/b][/b]2013
will be a big year of dev on the new Mass Effect. I only know the game
today will be very different than the game a year later #[/s]Excited[/b]

EDIT - There's this as well:

Sascha Dikiciyan ‏@[/s]sonicmayhem[/b][/b]Back to work on the last #[/s]ME3DLC[/b]. Trying out some new toys!

Speculate! Echh, I have enough of this...

EDIT: Just check the The Twitter Thread (ME3 DLC Edition) thread

Modifié par McGrzegorz, 07 janvier 2013 - 04:33 .

[MaximizedAction]

Lokanaiya wrote...

One last thing: Destroy is the "practical" correct choice, but Refuse is the "thematic" correct choice. Personally, I think thematic stuff would be more important when facing down the Reapers in a battle in the mind.

I like this comparison. I agree.

dorktainian wrote...
I'm saying that any of the options could
be correct (bar synthesis)....we do not know. valid reasons and excuses
can be made for any of the endings...  People say Shep dies in
Refuse.....but do we see him die?  The last time we see him is when
everything goes quiet on the citadel after the beam is turned off.
 Destroy has Shep in the rubble taking his breath.  This should be a
good thing right?  We don't know.  We have no answers....only guesswork.
 It's all speculation.  How is one piece of speculation better than
another?  they are both.......speculation.

And that's also a thing that keeps me hanging on to Refuse: it's rediculously presented outcome:
Oh you don't want to play? Ok, you lose. N...No...No, you lose. Bye.

I get that the devs didn't have an infinit amount of time for the EC, but coming up with an extra ending without taking the time to present it properly with all the cinematics of a failure can't be explained. So I find that unlikely.

demersel wrote...

Isn't it a genius move by the reaper
leader to present an option to destroy them (as you insist he does) as
one of HIS options? Knowing that you might not trust anything he says at
all and veiw everything he proposes as a trap? )))

You're like suspecting someone to be a tripple agent without even knowing for sure whether he's a double agent.

Modifié par MaximizedAction, 07 janvier 2013 - 04:29 .

[demersel]

MaximizedAction wrote...

demersel wrote...

Isn't it a genius move by the reaper
leader to present an option to destroy them (as you insist he does) as
one of HIS options? Knowing that you might not trust anything he says at
all and veiw everything he proposes as a trap? )))

You're like suspecting someone to be a tripple agent without even knowing for sure whether he's a double agent.

Exactly. Only that is your reasoning for refuse. 

Modifié par demersel, 07 janvier 2013 - 04:31 .

[MaximizedAction]

twitter.com/sonicmayhem/status/288319881613545472
"Back to work on the last #ME3DLC. Trying out some new toys!"

What I'm taking from this:
They're already working on the last DLC.Ok, not necessarily the last as in final.
The usual DLC composers are working on it.

However, if this is the same DLC Sam Hulick was tweeting about (he used the same hashtag) then this might mean that they got almost the whole team working on the big DLC.

Too many speculations!

edit: already posted by McGrzegorz.

edit2:
twitter.com/sonicmayhem/status/288325779216035840
"Ok, lets try this again. Work on LATEST #ME3DLC continues. That make sense? ;)"

There we go. But could this be the same DLC Sam's working on?

Modifié par MaximizedAction, 07 janvier 2013 - 05:09 .

[demersel]

New toys might mean vehicles.

[draconian139]

"What if I forgot how to design video games while I've been away?! Kidding! We all know designers don't know **** & make it all up as we go."

Obviously sarcastic. This was immediately after his post about ME being very different a year from now.

[Rosewind]

ElSuperGecko wrote...

Rosewind wrote...
That's no Koala that is a drop bear mate!

Look up, stay alive.  Better yet, make sure you wear a pointy hat. 

I know the rules I am an aussie my self

[lex0r11]

Silly aussies! I miss that country.

Oh, what's up, IT?

Modifié par lex0r11, 07 janvier 2013 - 04:53 .

[AuditoreanGhost]

I don't know if this is relevant or not but anyway..

The Beam that transports us up to the Citadel.... we have seen it before. (We didn't use it however)
I'm playing the trilogy through completionistically and during the Project Firewalker missions I spotted this thing.
It's in the Geth Incursions mission. Looking at the construct below it,it's definitely not Reaper tech.

I know grasping at straws..

[CoolioThane]

McGrzegorz wrote...

Uhhuuu,

I don't if it is legit... but..
Manveer Heir ‏@[/s]manveerheir[/b][/b]2013
will be a big year of dev on the new Mass Effect. I only know the game
today will be very different than the game a year later #[/s]Excited[/b]

EDIT - There's this as well:

Sascha Dikiciyan ‏@[/s]sonicmayhem[/b][/b]Back to work on the last #[/s]ME3DLC[/b]. Trying out some new toys!

Speculate! Echh, I have enough of this...

EDIT: Just check the The Twitter Thread (ME3 DLC Edition) thread

Bold: Well that is a very good sign for IT isn't it 
Edit: I look a right retard. That's obviously meant to mean ME4 lol

If only they can release a tweet: ME3 will be very different tomorrow that it was last year 

Modifié par CoolioThane, 07 janvier 2013 - 05:01 .

[GethPrimeMKII]

You sure theyre not referring to mass effect 4, CT?

[CoolioThane]

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

You sure theyre not referring to mass effect 4, CT?

I know, my head muddled up words so I read what I wanted to read 

[draconian139]

CoolioThane wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

You sure theyre not referring to mass effect 4, CT?

I know, my head muddled up words so I read what I wanted to read 

I did the same thing.

[GethPrimeMKII]

I mean its still a good sign. ME4 wont have much of a conflict if the endings are literal.

[draconian139]

I'm still assuming that ME4 will be a prequel...which I have very little interest in unless its during the Rachni wars.

[demersel]

It won't be a prequel.

[MaximizedAction]

demersel wrote...

It won't be a prequel.

Source pls?