byne wrote...
CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
Coolio, just let it go.
Modifié par N7L4D, 12 août 2012 - 11:13 .
estebanus wrote...
Because ending your sentence with a "good for you" obviously isn't an attack. No, that's not what you wrote.CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
You wrote that if someone is an ass to you, you'll be an ass to them. That's just childish. By doing this, you do nothing but stoop down to the person's level that has insulted you.
Modifié par byne, 12 août 2012 - 11:14 .
CoolioThane wrote...
estebanus wrote...
What? Are you talking about that thing a few days ago? I never thought you called me an idiot.CoolioThane wrote...
Then why post? It was only going to get a negative reaction considering the antagonistic nature of the question.
Thats n what I said. Whenever people post off topic out of the blue you don't jump on it like you have done here. I called you an arse for the negative and rude nature of your post.
Get over it. I didn't call you an idiot, I called people who HATE IT idiots FFs.
You posted "that's nice you calling me an idiot" forgive me for thinking you thought I called you an idiot.
Look, let's just drop it. The greatest Olympics ever is over and I'm sad
Modifié par Jade8aby88, 12 août 2012 - 11:14 .
Jade8aby88 wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Yay! Hopefully I can have a Santa Claus armor set!Dwailing wrote...
BioWare will release a costume pack!
Mr. Sparkles is already all sparkly about what he might be getting...
Copy that.byne wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Because ending your sentence with a "good for you" obviously isn't an attack. No, that's not what you wrote.CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
You wrote that if someone is an ass to you, you'll be an ass to them. That's just childish. By doing this, you do nothing but stoop down to the person's level that has insulted you.
Estebanus, you drop it too.
estebanus wrote...
Because ending your sentence with a "good for you" obviously isn't an attack. No, that's not what you wrote.CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
You wrote that if someone is an ass to you, you'll be an ass to them. That's just childish. By doing this, you do nothing but stoop down to the person's level that has insulted you.
Quod erat demonstrandum. Goodbye.CoolioThane wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Because ending your sentence with a "good for you" obviously isn't an attack. No, that's not what you wrote.CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
You wrote that if someone is an ass to you, you'll be an ass to them. That's just childish. By doing this, you do nothing but stoop down to the person's level that has insulted you.
It was a "good for you ;)" in recognition of the post you wrote then swiftly edited...
I don't take ****, sorry for 'stooping' but I'm pretty tall do am used to it:huh:
****** for tat bruv
Modifié par estebanus, 12 août 2012 - 11:20 .
CoolioThane wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Because ending your sentence with a "good for you" obviously isn't an attack. No, that's not what you wrote.CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
You wrote that if someone is an ass to you, you'll be an ass to them. That's just childish. By doing this, you do nothing but stoop down to the person's level that has insulted you.
It was a "good for you ;)" in recognition of the post you wrote then swiftly edited...
I don't take ****, sorry for 'stooping' but I'm pretty tall do am used to it:huh:
****** for tat bruv
And an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. 
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
Coolio, dafuq man, you behave like a 12 years old (I wouldn't be surprised if you actually are a 12 years old).
Wait, what? Why would he say that? I can understand the first two questions, but the last one... Who's playing God? The soldiers trying to save their lives? Certainly not.Jade8aby88 wrote...
This success will bring hope to billions of people. It will also enrage some of them. Be prepared for the tough questions – when are we starting our full-scale assault? Why retrieve this helium-3 magnate but not another one, or save my loved ones? Who are you to play God?
Modifié par Epök, 12 août 2012 - 11:25 .
Arrogant once more. Good riddanceestebanus wrote...
Quod erat demonstrandum. Goodbye.CoolioThane wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Because ending your sentence with a "good for you" obviously isn't an attack. No, that's not what you wrote.CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
You wrote that if someone is an ass to you, you'll be an ass to them. That's just childish. By doing this, you do nothing but stoop down to the person's level that has insulted you.
It was a "good for you ;)" in recognition of the post you wrote then swiftly edited...
I don't take ****, sorry for 'stooping' but I'm pretty tall do am used to it:huh:
****** for tat bruv
Byne's on his trip now, so probably not. I presume you're on 360 however, so if you want to play, add me.N7L4D wrote...
byne wrote...
CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
Coolio, just let it go.
Hey Byne what's up! When are you gonna play multiplayer
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 12 août 2012 - 11:25 .
Bye Estebanus!estebanus wrote...
Quod erat demonstrandum. Goodbye.
CoolioThane wrote...
Arrogant once more. Good riddanceestebanus wrote...
Quod erat demonstrandum. Goodbye.CoolioThane wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Because ending your sentence with a "good for you" obviously isn't an attack. No, that's not what you wrote.CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
You wrote that if someone is an ass to you, you'll be an ass to them. That's just childish. By doing this, you do nothing but stoop down to the person's level that has insulted you.
It was a "good for you ;)" in recognition of the post you wrote then swiftly edited...
I don't take ****, sorry for 'stooping' but I'm pretty tall do am used to it:huh:
****** for tat bruv
Humans have a sayingDwailing wrote...
CoolioThane wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Because ending your sentence with a "good for you" obviously isn't an attack. No, that's not what you wrote.CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
You wrote that if someone is an ass to you, you'll be an ass to them. That's just childish. By doing this, you do nothing but stoop down to the person's level that has insulted you.
It was a "good for you ;)" in recognition of the post you wrote then swiftly edited...
I don't take ****, sorry for 'stooping' but I'm pretty tall do am used to it:huh:
****** for tat bruv
You're a Renegade, aren't you?
Jade8aby88 wrote...
To get this thread back on track, and away from childish bickering...
This is Admiral Hackett's full operation report, I made a thread about this and literally got no replies...
"By now you have probably heard that Operation OVERWATCH succeeded on many fronts. Frankly, I would not be surprised if this message goes unread until tomorrow due to excessive celebrating. You have struck the Reapers where they are strongest and lived to tell the tale. Credit goes to you, to those shuttle pilots who retrieved your teams, and to the many personnel who supported and planned the missions.
But I also want to speak to some of what you may be seeing in the media soon. Eventually, it will be public knowledge that we had operations on Earth, retrieving data and personnel necessary for the military and economic well-being of the galaxy.
This success will bring hope to billions of people. It will also enrage some of them. Be prepared for the tough questions – when are we starting our full-scale assault? Why retrieve this helium-3 magnate but not another one, or save my loved ones? Who are you to play God?
There are no good answers to these questions. The reality is, the Reapers have almost every conceivable advantage -- numbers, firepower, technology – and we make do with what we have. We strike and retreat because facing the foe head-on would be a disaster. Nowhere is this truer than at Earth.
We have started to give them a death by a thousand cuts. Take heart in this, celebrate, and relax tonight. Tomorrow morning, we will get down to business, because there’s nine hundred and ninety left to go.
--Admiral Hackett"
SO, Could this Helium-3 Magnate possibly be Jonah Ashland? And what would be the significance of this? Just to maintain the galactic economy, as Hackett pointed out?
I might be back later, might not.
Guest_10110001110100_*
Dwailing wrote...
CoolioThane wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Because ending your sentence with a "good for you" obviously isn't an attack. No, that's not what you wrote.CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
You wrote that if someone is an ass to you, you'll be an ass to them. That's just childish. By doing this, you do nothing but stoop down to the person's level that has insulted you.
It was a "good for you ;)" in recognition of the post you wrote then swiftly edited...
I don't take ****, sorry for 'stooping' but I'm pretty tall do am used to it:huh:
****** for tat bruv
You're a Renegade, aren't you?
I think it's just him referring to saving some people on Earth and not others.Epök wrote...
Wait, what? Why would he say that? I can understand the first two questions, but the last one... Who's playing God? The soldiers trying to save their lives? Certainly not.Jade8aby88 wrote...
This success will bring hope to billions of people. It will also enrage some of them. Be prepared for the tough questions – when are we starting our full-scale assault? Why retrieve this helium-3 magnate but not another one, or save my loved ones? Who are you to play God?
NopDwailing wrote...
CoolioThane wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Because ending your sentence with a "good for you" obviously isn't an attack. No, that's not what you wrote.CoolioThane wrote...
What the ****? How is saying "I wont be angry with you if you aren't with me" childish?
Jesus H Christ, I tried to end it an you see it as an attack. ****ing hell
You wrote that if someone is an ass to you, you'll be an ass to them. That's just childish. By doing this, you do nothing but stoop down to the person's level that has insulted you.
It was a "good for you ;)" in recognition of the post you wrote then swiftly edited...
I don't take ****, sorry for 'stooping' but I'm pretty tall do am used to it:huh:
****** for tat bruv
You're a Renegade, aren't you?
Btw Marble Hornets is awesome
CoolioThane wrote...
Arrogant once more. Good riddance
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
![=]](https://lvlt.forum.bioware.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sideways.png)
