Simon
First off, let me begin by simply apologizing. Clearly I came off like a jerk. I also made some unfair accusations. I apologize for insulting you.
Doomsday pointed me to your full post on page 407. I was responding to the quote pyramid atop page 408, which was only a sliver of your post. In it's entirety, and understanding the context of the response to heretic hanar, it's obvious I misrepresented your position. Even without that context, I was unfair and rude. I should have gone back a few pages before launching into you like that, and I do hope you believe me when I say that I wasn't trying to attack you personally, just what I too hastily assumed was your position.
IT is not a retcon device, as we clearly both know. In fact it's the opposite. IT provides a way to take the narrative further without trivializing what the player has already experienced. In retrospect, I find both the thematic element and the plot device to be inseparably linked, both equally fundamental to understanding the meaning of Indoctrination Theory. You and Doomsday are correct, we supporters of IT too often fail to explain what the story behind all the little details we have found actually means to the player and the series, creating confusion as to what Indoctrination Theory really is, and providing no emotional resonance to draw people in.
Modifié par spotlessvoid, 17 août 2012 - 06:19 .