Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
80611 réponses à ce sujet

#13151
BansheeOwnage

BansheeOwnage
  • Members
  • 11 290 messages

HellishFiend wrote...

Arashi08 wrote...


The drift is actually just under 1500k; I played ME1 to death trying to make my femshep look halfway decent so that line is practically seared into my brain, as is the part where Nihlus says "1500 is good.  Your captain will be pleased" just in case I missed it when Joker says it the first time lol

Edit:  So...was i Posted Image'd or...Posted Image'd?  or something? Posted Image


The latter. :bandit: :P

Also, that definitely is not what Nihlus says... and I wouldnt even know how to spell it....

I'm pretty sure that's exactly what Nihlus said. Posted Image Anyway, 4 days until Leviathan :D I'm going to bed now; see you tomorrow later today!

Edit: I'm back on top! Take that Estebanus(ister) Posted Image

Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 24 août 2012 - 07:18 .


#13152
Leonia

Leonia
  • Members
  • 9 496 messages
Speaking of Nihlus, does anyone else wish he had more screen time? And what was in those files that Saren so desperately wanted?

#13153
StElmo

StElmo
  • Members
  • 4 997 messages
When is the doco out? so excited (don't beluieve IT but want to)

#13154
Ginissss

Ginissss
  • Members
  • 31 messages
Finally joined this thread, respect to all the fellow indoctrination theory believers. Honestly I do not have hi hopes for Leviathan revealing what most of us have been waiting for, the ec wasn't planned, they probably didn't want to reveal it in the first single player dlc anyway. Though I have no idea when they will reveal the breath scene with Shepard waking up, I think that the future omega dlc is going to have Shepard facing off the remaining crippled Cerberus members including the token black bad guy from the comic and a boss battle with the illusive man transformed similar to how he looked in the collectors edition concept art.

Also anyone know any easier ways to get a damn custom avatar on here. I need to have venom from spiderman 3 because ERIC FORMAN AS VENOM IS EPIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Modifié par Ginissss, 24 août 2012 - 07:49 .


#13155
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages

Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...

ebuchala wrote...

BansheeOwnage wrote...

I brought up the Hackett thing, and I maintain it may have been a reaper message, but I don't think Hackett is indoctrinated. I'll be back in a bit.


Right--but do you remember who brought up the Glyph/Shadow Broker thing? They were pointing out SB's ship was incredibly old and designed to be hidden so perhaps SB himself was always someone who worked for the Reapers, indoctrinated in the same manner Saren was where he was given some autonomy so he could be functional. Which then leads to Liara being on her way to indoctrination, of course, if not already indoctrinated.

Personally, I doubt this is the case and I really don't see a reason to believe Glyph works for the reapers somehow but it was something that was discussed before on the thread. I can see how someone might add things up and come to that conclusion, I just don't think it's accurate.


I doubt it, even the slow methodical Indoctrination Saren went through can only be kept going for a few years before the victims brain starts decaying. There would have to be a hell of a lot of Shadow Brokers to keep that up.


the shodow broker's rig can be indoctrination-safe - like the relays and the citadel. THey to are of reaper build and origin, but they lack the indoctrination capabilities. 

That's the logic behind my other theory, that reapers may turn out to be not even sentient. 
See, there are things that are reaper-built that do emit (spread) indoctrination, like artifacts. chunks of dead reapers, etc, and then there are things that are build by the reaper-built that don't emit (spread) indoctrination like the relays, the citadel, and possibly the shadow broker ship and Glyph VI. 

Now, why is there such diffirence? 
I have a theory, it is just a speculation, but i think  very fun at that. It has no practical applience to the IT or to the plot of the games, but it does explain reaper origins, and the cycles, and why are they the way they are.

What do we know about reapers for sure?    -  the cycle of extermination of all ANDVANCED and SENTIENT races in the galaxy is their way of reproduction for sure, it's their way of making new reapers. It's way of having sex and procreating. 

Then, they themselves call the cycles a harvest. Ok, they cultivate advanced sentient life, then comes the point at which it is "ready" for harvesting - they come and harvesat it. What to they do with advanced sentient life? they gather all life froms dead or alive, then procces them into liquid goo. 

So for some reason one thing we know they 100% need is  liquid goo made of advanced sentied races of the galaxy. No other liquid goo is good enough for some reason.

We also know that this liquid goo is their way of consuming the essence of spiecies and all it's collective knowledge. Ok. So they are after our brains. 

Now let's get back to the two types of reaper-built things and start the speculation propper.

the most common trait of the thing that do have the power of indoctrination is that they are in most cases reapers themselves, or parts of reaper bodies dead or alive. Being dead or alive has no influence on reaprs ability to indoctrinate. Also we know that indoctrinated being can serve as beacons to indocrinate other beings. in that sense it is much like the spread of some disease, that re-arrenges thought patterns - it makes you think like a reaper. The more the diseases is pronnounced - the less coherent and sentient you are.  Final stage is husk. (doesn't matter if it is rapid or slow - in rapid you get a husk righ away in slow you get it in the end - by the end of ME1 Saren was almost a husk). 

Reapers can produce other reapers. But they also can make things that the citadel, and relays, that are tools, and don't have the pover of indoctrination.

What other thing we know about the indoctrination? We know , that reapers indoctrinate everything around them wether they need it or not, and whether they are even alive or not. If i'ts not something like the citadel or the relays, which don't indoctrinate. 
 
that gives us the notion, that everything that IS reaper can indoctrinate. In other words Reaper = Indoctrination. 

And using math we can say that indoctrinatioin = reaper (given time and quantity of life forms). 
If we have one indoctrinated person - "Gee, i need to help the reapers" 
If we have say 100 000 000 indoctrinated persons - evetually they would BUILD a reaper.

so we can say that indoctrination ultimately is the procces that re-arranges thought patterns into the notion that it would be nice to build a reaper (and that is inevitable)

And yet we don't actually know how exactly this procces works. What triggers it, or what spreads it. What is the mechanic behind indoctrination? 

But we DO HAVE a grip on a similiar concept. Riddle me this - what is alive, can live forever, is extremly old can control other things by a way of procreating?   why it is easy - it is a Thorian. Now, i'm not saying that reapers are initially thorians. no. nothing like that. Although the concepts do sound rather similiar, don't you think? Thorian spreads spores. Spores are what the plants (and thorian IS a plant) reproduce with. And yet, what do they do? they get inhaled by sentient beings and then take control of them (direct control if the initial Plant is alive and well). And they start to alter their hosts.   But that isn't everything they do. THEY BLOCK REAPER INDOCTRINATION.



Now. So we have a SENTIENT being, a plant, that can control other sentient beings in one corner. and we have Indoctrination in another.

Indoctrination can't impose direct control on the individual, unless there is a Reaper who can take direct control, and the indoctrination must be VERY pronounced to do this. 

If we put Thorian against reaper indoctrination (even with a Reaper nearby) - Thorian wins hands down.  And his method doesn't affect persons cognitive functions - at least not that we know of (it may, but does it slower).

Indoctrination DOES affect person's cognitive functions. It irreversibly decays them. 

(by the way, up until this point i only stated info that IS in games only, i have not even touched books and comics, since i haven't read them - only ingame info)

Now the real speculation starts. 

I say that it is perfectly plauseble, and possible, and doesn't contradict the in-game lore, and more over supports it, that reapers are in fact NOT SENTIENT.

they are fungus of some kind. Or something similary simple and primitive. (remember they were there even before life was yet primitive) 

in essence reapers are a notion. A concept. It is a concept of unification AND consuming. Giant space ships made of essence of all life in the galaxy is the pinnacle of this notion. 

I say that reapers are in truth some type of brain moss - it's just something like the fungus.   In fact they are the final stage of evolution of fungus that affects brain funcins (or something like that, what ever the mechanic under the process of indoctrination turns out to be) - it re-arrenges thought patterns into one way, BY consuming a brain.   Remember - in real life primitive non-sentient beings are perfectly capable of building of immense and complex structures - like ants and termites.

All their technology comes from assembled work of countless cycles. They can't create something of their own. (they can manufactor it, but can't come up with an idea for it, thus they need the collected knowledge of cycles)

Also the indoctrination evetually destroys it's host, so there is the need to get new hosts.

Reapers, the spaceships can talk and do stuff cause they have collective cognitive power of billions of life forms. 
And with time they use it up, like fuel. That's why the need for hibernation). It's not like the geth collective, where each program is independent, reapers are just like huge tankers, or storages of collected organic material, raw feed for the mold that reaarenges this raw material into thought patterns (and those thought patterns are - create more reapers. Because.) 

Modifié par demersel, 24 août 2012 - 08:01 .


#13156
Dav3VsTh3World

Dav3VsTh3World
  • Members
  • 567 messages
If there is a Documentary as you all say it better well show both sides of the argument otherwise its more of a propaganda piece

Just Saying

#13157
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages

Dav3VsTh3World wrote...

If there is a Documentary as you all say it better well show both sides of the argument otherwise its more of a propaganda piece

Just Saying


It's a propaganda piece. )

#13158
byne

byne
  • Members
  • 7 813 messages

Dav3VsTh3World wrote...

If there is a Documentary as you all say it better well show both sides of the argument otherwise its more of a propaganda piece

Just Saying


Wouldnt showing the other side just be repeating "Others claim this means nothing, and is just a sign of bad writing" after ever pro-IT point?

That'd get old fast.

#13159
Gwyphon

Gwyphon
  • Members
  • 810 messages

byne wrote...

Dav3VsTh3World wrote...

If there is a Documentary as you all say it better well show both sides of the argument otherwise its more of a propaganda piece

Just Saying


Wouldnt showing the other side just be repeating "Others claim this means nothing, and is just a sign of bad writing" after ever pro-IT point?

That'd get old fast.


^ Well said.

I like Clevernoob's in that he actually turns down quite a bit of evidence. Though I personally dismiss some stuff that he's accepted, I still find him on the fair end of the spectrum.

#13160
Arian Dynas

Arian Dynas
  • Members
  • 3 799 messages
Ugh.

No offense folks, but personally, I am quite resoundingly sick of "Clevernoob" considering what I have seen of him, there's very little clever about him, and most of his time is spent trying to get his 15 minutes of internet fame from OUR work, and he just edits the video together, while presenting himself as an absolute authority, which is NOT.

Hell, Byne and I are more of an authority than Clevernoob. HellishFeind and Salient Archer are more of an authority.

EpyonX3 and HagarIshay are more of an authority than he is.

At least they, you know, appear in the goddamn thread.

Modifié par Arian Dynas, 24 août 2012 - 09:19 .


#13161
Dav3VsTh3World

Dav3VsTh3World
  • Members
  • 567 messages

byne wrote...

Dav3VsTh3World wrote...

If there is a Documentary as you all say it better well show both sides of the argument otherwise its more of a propaganda piece

Just Saying


Wouldnt showing the other side just be repeating "Others claim this means nothing, and is just a sign of bad writing" after ever pro-IT point?

That'd get old fast.


Well for one there's the point that this was brought up by Bioware according the the Final Hours app, and that it was going to be implemented in the game at one point, but scrapped because it was deemed to difficult to implement gameplay wise and the fact that doing so would go against the lore of indoctrination as set out in ME1 where indoctrinated subjects are eventually reduced to mindless wanderers. Futhermore it would contridict Shepards actions against the Illusive Man since he was already well indoctrinated.

#13162
estebanus

estebanus
  • Members
  • 5 987 messages

Arian Dynas wrote...

Ugh.

No offense folks, but personally, I am quite resoundingly sick of "Clevernoob" considering what I have seen of him, there's very little clever about him, and most of his time is spent trying to get his 15 minutes of internet fame from OUR work, and he just edits the video together, while presenting himself as an absolute authority, which is NOT.

Hell, Byne and I are more of an authority than Clevernoob. HellishFeind and Salient Archer are more of an authority.

EpyonX3 and HagarIshay are more of an authority than he is.

At least they, you know, appear in the goddamn thread.

Is my brother an authority here, or is he more of a lurker?

#13163
Arian Dynas

Arian Dynas
  • Members
  • 3 799 messages

Dav3VsTh3World wrote...

byne wrote...

Dav3VsTh3World wrote...

If there is a Documentary as you all say it better well show both sides of the argument otherwise its more of a propaganda piece

Just Saying


Wouldnt showing the other side just be repeating "Others claim this means nothing, and is just a sign of bad writing" after ever pro-IT point?

That'd get old fast.


Well for one there's the point that this was brought up by Bioware according the the Final Hours app, and that it was going to be implemented in the game at one point, but scrapped because it was deemed to difficult to implement gameplay wise and the fact that doing so would go against the lore of indoctrination as set out in ME1 where indoctrinated subjects are eventually reduced to mindless wanderers. Futhermore it would contridict Shepards actions against the Illusive Man since he was already well indoctrinated.


They said the scrapped the mechanic, not that the idea was ever scrapped.

Besides, as I have said several times to many different people, I am a DM (Dungeon Master, a sort of referee/arbiter/NPC controller in the RPG called Dungeons and Dragons for those not in the know, which I doubt is many of you.) and think of it like this.

If I WERE implementing something like Indoctrination, a slow, degenerative process that manipulates a personality, rather than actual mind control, a sort of creeping corruption, into a game I was running which would be easier? Making a mechanic and tracking it, then using that mechanic to take control away from the players, thus destroying player agency and control?

Or simply manipulating the player?

Also, how indoctrination works has since been expanded upon to explain there are two different varieties, slow, which reduces a thrall to the state you mentioned quickly, and slow, where a Reaper takes their time, manipulating and infiltraiting their way into the subject's mind, rather than brute forcing in. "Slow, patient indoctrination can allow a thrall to last for months, or years."

Indoctrination is manipulation, the subject retains their control and their goals, but their methods are skewed. It's not mind control, or mental domination.

It doesn't make you do things you don't want to do, it makes you want to do them.

Modifié par Arian Dynas, 24 août 2012 - 09:30 .


#13164
Arian Dynas

Arian Dynas
  • Members
  • 3 799 messages

estebanus wrote...

Arian Dynas wrote...

Ugh.

No offense folks, but personally, I am quite resoundingly sick of "Clevernoob" considering what I have seen of him, there's very little clever about him, and most of his time is spent trying to get his 15 minutes of internet fame from OUR work, and he just edits the video together, while presenting himself as an absolute authority, which is NOT.

Hell, Byne and I are more of an authority than Clevernoob. HellishFeind and Salient Archer are more of an authority.

EpyonX3 and HagarIshay are more of an authority than he is.

At least they, you know, appear in the goddamn thread.

Is my brother an authority here, or is he more of a lurker?


As often as he posts he's far from a lurker. I wouldn't call him an authority, since I think he himself would rail at the label, in fact. But yes, HE knows more about Indoctrination Theory than Clevernoob does. and he is ALOT more involved than just some **** sitting on the sidelines with his camera, trying to take the credit.

#13165
estebanus

estebanus
  • Members
  • 5 987 messages

Arian Dynas wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Arian Dynas wrote...

Ugh.

No offense folks, but personally, I am quite resoundingly sick of "Clevernoob" considering what I have seen of him, there's very little clever about him, and most of his time is spent trying to get his 15 minutes of internet fame from OUR work, and he just edits the video together, while presenting himself as an absolute authority, which is NOT.

Hell, Byne and I are more of an authority than Clevernoob. HellishFeind and Salient Archer are more of an authority.

EpyonX3 and HagarIshay are more of an authority than he is.

At least they, you know, appear in the goddamn thread.

Is my brother an authority here, or is he more of a lurker?


As often as he posts he's far from a lurker. I wouldn't call him an authority, since I think he himself would rail at the label, in fact. But yes, HE knows more about Indoctrination Theory than Clevernoob does. and he is ALOT more involved than just some **** sitting on the sidelines with his camera, trying to take the credit.

Yeah, he always was a modest one. Also, I watched these two documentaries yesterday, and it seems to me that he's missed a few things, but at least I got to learn what exactly the people found here since March.

#13166
Rosewind

Rosewind
  • Members
  • 1 801 messages

Arian Dynas wrote...

estebanus wrote...

Arian Dynas wrote...

Ugh.

No offense folks, but personally, I am quite resoundingly sick of "Clevernoob" considering what I have seen of him, there's very little clever about him, and most of his time is spent trying to get his 15 minutes of internet fame from OUR work, and he just edits the video together, while presenting himself as an absolute authority, which is NOT.

Hell, Byne and I are more of an authority than Clevernoob. HellishFeind and Salient Archer are more of an authority.

EpyonX3 and HagarIshay are more of an authority than he is.

At least they, you know, appear in the goddamn thread.

Is my brother an authority here, or is he more of a lurker?


As often as he posts he's far from a lurker. I wouldn't call him an authority, since I think he himself would rail at the label, in fact. But yes, HE knows more about Indoctrination Theory than Clevernoob does. and he is ALOT more involved than just some **** sitting on the sidelines with his camera, trying to take the credit.


lol Even I know more about it then clever does, and HELLO Este Sister!!! hope your injury heals well but not quickly so you can enjoy more time off :P!

#13167
Arian Dynas

Arian Dynas
  • Members
  • 3 799 messages
I came in on Avacayos, discovered the rest here.

#13168
Kurrabin

Kurrabin
  • Members
  • 29 messages
I believe clevernoob is doing a great service for IT. I've watched numerous YouTube videos, and no other IT video is at the same level of quality.

If we want to convince people, we have to present our theory in a good way. His videos are doing this.

This is more like a symbiotic relationship. Also, even though he got most of the stuff from IT discussion, there were a few small additions of his own too.

#13169
MaximizedAction

MaximizedAction
  • Members
  • 3 293 messages

Arian Dynas wrote...

ebuchala wrote...

*snip*



...

...

...

I know I'm late to the party on this one, but I'VE BEEN SAYING THAT THE CRUCIBLE WILL TURN THE CITADEL INTO A MASSIVE MASS ACCELERATOR CANNON FOR AGES NOW! :o


Yes, yes you have!

I myself, never read the Crucible war asset entries in that context. But hell it makes sense.

Now, what they could do, while staying true to the community managers' words, to be 'done with the endings':
they add extra endings like the part where Shep 'mounts' the Citadel cannon and shoots the Reapers, thereby finishing them off one after one (like a reversed Return of the Jedi space battle). And after that they play the Destroy epilogue. And Shepard could still die (or not).

FYI: I don't like it since there would still be that sour taste to the endings, since Shepard dies (or not), but at least that scenario would allow for some feeling of accomplishment.

#13170
Gwyphon

Gwyphon
  • Members
  • 810 messages

Arian Dynas wrote...

Ugh.

No offense folks, but personally, I am quite resoundingly sick of "Clevernoob" considering what I have seen of him, there's very little clever about him, and most of his time is spent trying to get his 15 minutes of internet fame from OUR work, and he just edits the video together, while presenting himself as an absolute authority, which is NOT.

Hell, Byne and I are more of an authority than Clevernoob. HellishFeind and Salient Archer are more of an authority.

EpyonX3 and HagarIshay are more of an authority than he is.

At least they, you know, appear in the goddamn thread.


Yeah I know but he gives a great intro into the theory as he presents the basics in an understandable fashion for people who haven't been following this thread religiously. I've used it to successfully addict three friends to this thread :D

#13171
Arian Dynas

Arian Dynas
  • Members
  • 3 799 messages

Kurrabin wrote...

I believe clevernoob is doing a great service for IT. I've watched numerous YouTube videos, and no other IT video is at the same level of quality.

If we want to convince people, we have to present our theory in a good way. His videos are doing this.

This is more like a symbiotic relationship. Also, even though he got most of the stuff from IT discussion, there were a few small additions of his own too.


Avacayos; Shepard's Indoctrination

SentraMaster(AKA HellishFiend); Choose Wisely

Pro781623; There Is Only One Choice

PrettzZell; The Mystery of the Gun and several others.

You were saying? All of these are of equal quality or greater to Clevernoob. At least two of them are nearly as long as his documentaries, or longer. All of them communicate their point eloquently and concisely providing solid evidence and implications for their suppositions.

Cleverboob throws ideas out simply because he doesn't like the way they sound. <_<

Yes, this really DOES annoy me.

#13172
Arian Dynas

Arian Dynas
  • Members
  • 3 799 messages

MaximizedAction wrote...

Arian Dynas wrote...

ebuchala wrote...

*snip*



...

...

...

I know I'm late to the party on this one, but I'VE BEEN SAYING THAT THE CRUCIBLE WILL TURN THE CITADEL INTO A MASSIVE MASS ACCELERATOR CANNON FOR AGES NOW! :o


Yes, yes you have!

I myself, never read the Crucible war asset entries in that context. But hell it makes sense.

Now, what they could do, while staying true to the community managers' words, to be 'done with the endings':
they add extra endings like the part where Shep 'mounts' the Citadel cannon and shoots the Reapers, thereby finishing them off one after one (like a reversed Return of the Jedi space battle). And after that they play the Destroy epilogue. And Shepard could still die (or not).

FYI: I don't like it since there would still be that sour taste to the endings, since Shepard dies (or not), but at least that scenario would allow for some feeling of accomplishment.


Specifically what I say is, the Crucible is a wild goose chase and always has been, but our way OUT of the situation is using it to jerry-rig the Citadel into becoming a big ol' MAC.

#13173
Gwyphon

Gwyphon
  • Members
  • 810 messages

Arian Dynas wrote...

Kurrabin wrote...

I believe clevernoob is doing a great service for IT. I've watched numerous YouTube videos, and no other IT video is at the same level of quality.

If we want to convince people, we have to present our theory in a good way. His videos are doing this.

This is more like a symbiotic relationship. Also, even though he got most of the stuff from IT discussion, there were a few small additions of his own too.


Avacayos; Shepard's Indoctrination

SentraMaster(AKA HellishFiend); Choose Wisely

Pro781623; There Is Only One Choice

PrettzZell; The Mystery of the Gun and several others.

You were saying? All of these are of equal quality or greater to Clevernoob. At least two of them are nearly as long as his documentaries, or longer. All of them communicate their point eloquently and concisely providing solid evidence and implications for their suppositions.

Cleverboob throws ideas out simply because he doesn't like the way they sound. <_<

Yes, this really DOES annoy me.


Putting evidence aside makes it seem more legitimate, and he does a great job of raising my expectations for the future of Mass Effect 3. More so than the other videos. But that's just me personally

#13174
MaximizedAction

MaximizedAction
  • Members
  • 3 293 messages

Gwyphon wrote...

Yeah I know but he gives a great intro into the theory as he presents the basics in an understandable fashion for people who haven't been following this thread religiously. I've used it to successfully addict three friends to this thread :D


What's wrong with Avacayos's video? No disrespect from Clevernoob but is Avacayos's vid suddenly not mindblowing enough? Does it lack a narrator and stylish dialogs and crazy graphics?

But maybe it's me, since I'm not a fan of this whole infotainment thing. I prefer my documentaries containing only cold hard facts without any great graphic design or funny commentary.

And in my opinion, cold hard facts and only-game material is more convincing. But that doesn't mean that Clevernoob is less good journalism...in fact, I like his vids more than that other guy's recent indoc thread where he didn't even care to mention that there already existed an IT that did most of his analysis.
That led to people liking a theory on how the player and Shepard might've gotten indoctrinated but still disagreeing with IT.

Modifié par MaximizedAction, 24 août 2012 - 10:03 .


#13175
Arian Dynas

Arian Dynas
  • Members
  • 3 799 messages

Gwyphon wrote...

Arian Dynas wrote...

Kurrabin wrote...

I believe clevernoob is doing a great service for IT. I've watched numerous YouTube videos, and no other IT video is at the same level of quality.

If we want to convince people, we have to present our theory in a good way. His videos are doing this.

This is more like a symbiotic relationship. Also, even though he got most of the stuff from IT discussion, there were a few small additions of his own too.


Avacayos; Shepard's Indoctrination

SentraMaster(AKA HellishFiend); Choose Wisely

Pro781623; There Is Only One Choice

PrettzZell; The Mystery of the Gun and several others.

You were saying? All of these are of equal quality or greater to Clevernoob. At least two of them are nearly as long as his documentaries, or longer. All of them communicate their point eloquently and concisely providing solid evidence and implications for their suppositions.

Cleverboob throws ideas out simply because he doesn't like the way they sound. <_<

Yes, this really DOES annoy me.


Putting evidence aside makes it seem more legitimate, and he does a great job of raising my expectations for the future of Mass Effect 3. More so than the other videos. But that's just me personally


There's dismissing poor evidence or dissecting bad arguments, and then there's "I don't think that's the case, but I haven't really done any research, so I'll just throw it out."

There's admitting when the other side makes a good point (such as certain cases where it CAN be legitimately re-used assets or the like) but sacrificing a point to make yourself appear more legitimate is simply stupid.

However, I will give him this. He's the Sarah Palin of IT. He has little personal experience or first hand knowledge, but goddamn if he isn't skilled at riding and building hype and all that.