Applepie_Svk wrote...
GethPrimeMKII wrote...
Justin2k wrote...
Bioware have stated IT wasn't their intention. It's time for people to start realising Bioware really did write a pretentious, bad ending and move on. If this makes you sleep better, by all means, but this was never the intended way to take the ending, and having to write headcanon to make sense of it, just shows how garbage the original ending is.
Oh look, more outright lies and misconceptions. Something as detailed and intricate as the clues supporting the Indoctrination Theory, that just happen to fit the game's themes like a glove, are in no way unintentional.
“Mr Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: 'Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action'.” Ian Flemming
Exactly. [/Anderson] There is simply too much evidence for me to think anything else is true. If it isn't true, that raises some serious questions.
1. How the hell did they manage to have all of the evidence my accident?
2. How did they forget the themes and lore/storytelling/common sense for the end and
only the end of the trilogy?
3. A better question: If Leviathan has awesome writing (which it looks like it does), how did they manage to do #2
then go back to their normal good/great writing?
That, in my opinion, makes less sense than the literal ending. Who agrees?