Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
80611 réponses à ce sujet

#14801
Jaze55

Jaze55
  • Members
  • 1 071 messages

Andromidius wrote...

See the trolls still aren't going.

And no, don't twist my words to 'all non-IT's are trolls'. If you come into a thread and argue the toss over minor issues and then insult people, all the while claiming the thread is pointless...and keep posting for months and months on end...you're a troll. Fact.

Most people who disagree with IT simply don't post here. Pretty easy to understand, right?

Anyway, simple question to everyone. Is Leviathan worth downloading, and does it have anything really interesting going on that affects the ending (either directly or indirectly with added knowledge)?


Did it ever occur to you that while I 100% do not think IT is real I still like discussing it?

I don't think Mass Effect is real, still like discussing it.

I don't think Star Wars is real, still like discussing it.

Honestly YOU people are the ones with the attitude. I have made ZERO insults, yet one of your crew told me to kill myself. I like to discuss and get your points of views on things. That is not trolling. YOU people are the closed minded ones acting like arrogant d-bags, not me. As soon as someone expresses a different point of view you label them as trolls or tell them to get out of "Your" thread.

This thead does not belong to you and I will post wherever the hell I dam well please. I hope that doesnt bother you. 

#14802
The Heretic of Time

The Heretic of Time
  • Members
  • 5 612 messages

demersel wrote...

It supports the IT in the sense that now EVERYTHING that happens in the endings comes from shepards mind - Reapers use indoctrination to manipulate Shepard's own memories and knowledge and form a situation belivable for him, in which he may make a choice to accept their logic. Also it suggests that the reapers themselves at their core might have this logic - but it is still flawed and broken logic - this might hint at the fact that reapers themselves are just the faulty piece of equipment. (Like RobotSanta from the futurama) - They are not sentient, they only have some basic algorithms that guide them, and those algorithms are false and broken, with a lack of option to evolve - Reapers are the pinnacle - they are perfect no point into listening ot reason, or to analyse new facts. They just do what they were build to do, and do this eternally without stopping questionning or thinking. This proves that there are simply no point in listening to them, arguing with them, or trying to reason with them. They say themselves - they are not at war. Fire cannot be at war with the forest.


You still assume the Catalyst = the reapers, even though we now know this is not completely true. The Catalyst is an AI created by the Leviathans. The Catalyst on its turn transformed the Leviathans into the first reaper: Harbinger.

The Catalyst was programmed to preserve organic life, because the Leviathans rely on organics. They need organics.

The problem here is synthetics. They keep destroying all organics. But the real problem is organics themselves: they always create synthetics.

So the Catalyst is ordered to preserve organic life, but the organics always eventually destroys themselves by creating synthetics that seemingly always rebel against them. So how do you solve this?

The Catalyst had no permanent solution to this issue. The best thing it could come up with is the cycle. So the cycle started and the Leviathans became the first victims of it's cycle.

However, this implies that the Catalyst KNOWS that it's cycle is not perfect, it's not the perfect solution because it doesn't really solve anything. The only thing the cycle does is hit the reset button after every 50.000 years to prevent organics from destroying themselves by creating synthetics.

This is why the Catalyst is so eager to find a new solution. The Catalyst itself does not favor the cycle, not at all. The Crucible provides new solutions. The Catalyst however can't choose a new solution itself, for whatever reason, maybe because it's shackled, who knows. So it asks Shepard to choose a new solution.


So yes, the Catalyst is real, it does exist, it isn't evil and it does want a new solution. We all know this now.


Now what we have played Leviathan, the literal endings make a lot more sense. More so than the IT. 


 

There is no point in controlling them - the know and able to do one thing only - there is no control over them - you can't control fire by becoming fire.


This is not true. The Catalyst controls the reapers. We also see evidence that the Leviathans themselves can control reapers and their forces.

The Leviathan DLC proves the reapers CAN in fact be controlled. It IS possible.



THere is no point in synthesys - cause this is what they are trying to do in the first place and it's their original goal - if you combine fire and forest you get only coal and ashes(which has it's uses, but not for the forest),


Synthesis is nothing like what the reapers are now.

Yes, the Catalyst prefers synthesis, he's not hiding that at all. But so far synthetis was impossible. Only now with the Crucible is it possible. The Catalyst thinks synthesis is the best solution to the problem he's programmed to solve.


There is no point in making a moral stand and giving them a speach - you'll just get burned.


Indeed. Giving a moral speech to a friggin machine that is just doing what it's programmed to do is stupid. Besides, this machine WANTS to find a new solution with you. It WANTS to replace the cycle with a new better solution. Only a moron wouldn't seize this oppertunity.

You can only get rid of them forever - destroy. 


No, destroy is actually the worst option. We know now that the whole organics v.s synthetics problem is very real. Leviathan confirms this. So destroying the reapers is only a valid option if you believe you can make peace with synthetics in the future. Maybe you made peace with the geth, but can you do it again in the future?

#14803
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages

jgibson14352 wrote...

No. It doesn't confirm or deny, but it drops ZERO hints. Its IT ambiguous, that I quit. Its obvious they're never going to pick up on IT. They sure as sh*t intended it at some point, but now, no.


Calm down man. Why would they reveal it in the FIRST story DLC? In fact, why would they reveal it in anything they officially announce in advance?   No if it ever comes to be - it will be a SURPRISE. Just chill. Nothing really changed. If we speculate about the possible date of IT reaveal it could as well be APRIL 30 2014 - the EC expiration date. 
If It is ever going to be proved or revealed that that makes the existance of the EC pointless - and whatdoyouknow - it does have an expiration date, after which you wont be able to get any more. Which is just 2 years after the release of the game - you can stiil buy ME1 DLC, and it came out in 2007. 

Modifié par demersel, 28 août 2012 - 05:35 .


#14804
Andromidius

Andromidius
  • Members
  • 2 997 messages

MassEffected555 wrote...

Did it ever occur to you that while I 100% do not think IT is real I still like discussing it?


There's a difference between 'discussion' and 'being an arse'.

If you can't tell the difference, I pity you.

On topic, mention of James did spark something for me.  Wasn't he the only survivor of that operation against the Collectors?  Who knows what happened to him, and how true his story really is.

Still like the guy though.

#14805
RavenEyry

RavenEyry
  • Members
  • 4 394 messages

SauliusL wrote...
and boom Shepard is in his world created and spoken from Shepard's memories.

That's the first I've heard of that. Yep I can see how a DLC that includes another dream world made from Shep's memories conclusively disproves IT:whistle:

#14806
Jaze55

Jaze55
  • Members
  • 1 071 messages

Andromidius wrote...

MassEffected555 wrote...

Did it ever occur to you that while I 100% do not think IT is real I still like discussing it?


There's a difference between 'discussion' and 'being an arse'.

If you can't tell the difference, I pity you.

On topic, mention of James did spark something for me.  Wasn't he the only survivor of that operation against the Collectors?  Who knows what happened to him, and how true his story really is.

Still like the guy though.


Quote me being as ass please. If  you can't I pity you for your close mindedness and false accustations. 

Seriously, quote me being as arse, please. 

#14807
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages

MassEffected555 wrote...

This thead does not belong to you and I will post wherever the hell I dam well please. I hope that doesnt bother you. 


Then please stay on topic. :)

And the fact is - most of us have yet to play leviathan. So please come back in a day or two. :)

#14808
The Heretic of Time

The Heretic of Time
  • Members
  • 5 612 messages

demersel wrote...

If It is ever going to be proved or revealed that that makes the existance of the EC pointless - and whatdoyouknow - it does have an expiration date, after which you wont be able to get any more. Which is just 2 years after the release of the game - you can stiil buy ME1 DLC, and it came out in 2007. 


The expiration date for the EC is in no way related to the IT. The reason wy the EC has an expiration date is because it's free DLC. BioWare does not make any profit on it, but it does cost money to keep the DLC up and available. Thats why at a certain point, when free-DLC no longer gets downloaded on a regular basis, it expires.

#14809
Jaze55

Jaze55
  • Members
  • 1 071 messages

demersel wrote...

MassEffected555 wrote...

This thead does not belong to you and I will post wherever the hell I dam well please. I hope that doesnt bother you. 


Then please stay on topic. :)

And the fact is - most of us have yet to play leviathan. So please come back in a day or two. :)


Im playing it now myself. I just commented on what I read in the other Levi Spoiler Thread.

Hey, when you play you might get a kick out of the first few lines Bryson says - pay attention at the start.

#14810
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

The expiration date for the EC is in no way related to the IT. The reason wy the EC has an expiration date is because it's free DLC. BioWare does not make any profit on it, but it does cost money to keep the DLC up and available. Thats why at a certain point, when free-DLC no longer gets downloaded on a regular basis, it expires.


So you say. Wasn't it made to compelte the game the were at the brick of being sued for selling it incomplete?

And don't you think they would still like to sell ME3 in two years?   

#14811
Andromidius

Andromidius
  • Members
  • 2 997 messages

MassEffected555 wrote...

This thead does not belong to you and I will post wherever the hell I dam well please.


Here's one of many instances of you being an arse.

It didn't take long to find.  You're rude, abbrassive and frankly quite dull.  You add nothing to the discussion.

Oh, and you're welcome.

#14812
Sovereign24

Sovereign24
  • Members
  • 856 messages

Hrothdane wrote...

Sovereign24 wrote...

Are we allowed to discuss Leviathan spoliers in this thread?


A bunch of people here (including myself) haven't played it yet, so you can discuss it, but make sure to mark spoilers.


Ok cheers.

I haven't delved too deeply into IT so I just wanted to check to see if I have the basics right, so that I can process the effects of the DLC.

My basic understanding is that IT proposes the idea that Destroy is the only legitimate choice, as picking Synthesis or Control implies that you have been indoctrinated and have chosen to not destroy the Reapers once and for all.

If that's correct then I'll go to the spoilers bit.

******************************************************SPOILERS******************************************************





After viewing the content of the Leviathan DLC, it kind of changes the facts around Destroy (at least imo). I think it would be fair to say that Destroy was generally seen as the best option amognst fans. While not everyone who believes in Destroy also believes in IT, it would be fair to say that IT bases itself on the idea that destroying the Reapers is the ultimate prize, and that everything else is folly.

However with the revelation of the Leviathan's in the DLC, and especially their nature, does Destroy really seem so good? All destroying the Reapers does is pave the way for the Leviathan's to come back from the far reaches of Dark Space and re-assert their dominance on all organics. This wouldn't be too hard to invision given how much more effective their mind control powers are over the Reapers Indoctrination. And damn at least the Reapers let organics have their reign before extinguishing them. Life under Leviathian's would just be perpetual servitude.
 
So I guess my question is for those who believe in IT; Post-Leviathan does Destroy still seem like the best option?

I apologise in advance if I am intertwining IT with Destroy, but I always assumed that they were kind of linked.

#14813
jgibson14352

jgibson14352
  • Members
  • 415 messages

demersel wrote...

jgibson14352 wrote...

No. It doesn't confirm or deny, but it drops ZERO hints. Its IT ambiguous, that I quit. Its obvious they're never going to pick up on IT. They sure as sh*t intended it at some point, but now, no.


Calm down man. Why would they reveal it in the FIRST story DLC? In fact, why would they reveal it in anything they officially announce in advance?   No if it ever comes to be - it will be a SURPRISE. Just chill. Nothing really changed. If we speculate about the possible date of IT reaveal it could as well be APRIL 30 2014 - the EC expiration date. 
If It is ever going to be proved or revealed that that makes the existance of the EC pointless - and whatdoyouknow - it does have an expiration date, after which you wont be able to get any more. Which is just 2 years after the release of the game - you can stiil buy ME1 DLC, and it came out in 2007. 


Why. Why make it a surprise? So many people have already sworn off BioWare because they won't confirm or deny IT. Their probable profit margin is already severely diminished. They should have at least dropped some huge hints, but they didn't. And no. They are not going to release a huge super important story DLC 2 years after release. Xbox will be outdated by then.


 
@hanar leviathan never controlled a reaper, he took control of ground forces, just like the illusive man did on sanctuary

#14814
The Heretic of Time

The Heretic of Time
  • Members
  • 5 612 messages

demersel wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

The expiration date for the EC is in no way related to the IT. The reason wy the EC has an expiration date is because it's free DLC. BioWare does not make any profit on it, but it does cost money to keep the DLC up and available. Thats why at a certain point, when free-DLC no longer gets downloaded on a regular basis, it expires.


So you say. Wasn't it made to compelte the game the were at the brick of being sued for selling it incomplete?

And don't you think they would still like to sell ME3 in two years?   



Yes so I say because it's true. I work in the game industry myself, so I know this from experience.

And in two years they'll most likely sell a "Game of the Year edition" of ME3 that contains all the DLC on the disc.

#14815
Jaze55

Jaze55
  • Members
  • 1 071 messages

Andromidius wrote...

MassEffected555 wrote...

This thead does not belong to you and I will post wherever the hell I dam well please.


Here's one of many instances of you being an arse.

It didn't take long to find.  You're rude, abbrassive and frankly quite dull.  You add nothing to the discussion.

Oh, and you're welcome.


Nope sorry doesnt work. You do not own this thread and I WILL post wherever I please. I am American, I served in the Navy. I was there when the USS Cole got attacked on the USSupply AOE6. I was deployed twice to make sure I HAVE the right to speak when and where I want, and that you do as well. 
 

Being told I am not allowed to post somewhere is the epitome of being as arse, tyvm. 

#14816
The Heretic of Time

The Heretic of Time
  • Members
  • 5 612 messages

jgibson14352 wrote...

@hanar leviathan never controlled a reaper, he took control of ground forces, just like the illusive man did on sanctuary


Leviathan did control a reaper. That's how they took it down at the end of the DLC. The reaper struggles and crashes inside the ocean, but we don't see the reaper suffering from any real physical damage. To me it was clear that the Leviathans took over the reaper and "pressed the off-button", just like they're capable of doing with organics, as we saw earlier in the DLC.

Modifié par Heretic_Hanar, 28 août 2012 - 05:51 .


#14817
jgibson14352

jgibson14352
  • Members
  • 415 messages

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

jgibson14352 wrote...

@hanar leviathan never controlled a reaper, he took control of ground forces, just like the illusive man did on sanctuary


Leviathan did control a reaper. That's how they took it down at the end of the DLC. The reaper struggles and crashes inside the ocean, but we don't see the reaper suffering from any real physical damage. To me it was clear that the Leviathans took over the reaper and "pressed the off-button", just like they're capable of doing with organics, as we saw earlier in the DLC.


So by that logic the leviathan controlled the shuttle and the countless crashed ships? Its pretty obvious its just some kind of EMP-like weapon

#14818
Big_Boss9

Big_Boss9
  • Members
  • 532 messages

Sovereign24 wrote...

If that's correct then I'll go to the spoilers bit.

******************************************************SPOILERS******************************************************





After viewing the content of the Leviathan DLC, it kind of changes the facts around Destroy (at least imo). I think it would be fair to say that Destroy was generally seen as the best option amognst fans. While not everyone who believes in Destroy also believes in IT, it would be fair to say that IT bases itself on the idea that destroying the Reapers is the ultimate prize, and that everything else is folly.

However with the revelation of the Leviathan's in the DLC, and especially their nature, does Destroy really seem so good? All destroying the Reapers does is pave the way for the Leviathan's to come back from the far reaches of Dark Space and re-assert their dominance on all organics. This wouldn't be too hard to invision given how much more effective their mind control powers are over the Reapers Indoctrination. And damn at least the Reapers let organics have their reign before extinguishing them. Life under Leviathian's would just be perpetual servitude.
 
So I guess my question is for those who believe in IT; Post-Leviathan does Destroy still seem like the best option?

I apologise in advance if I am intertwining IT with Destroy, but I always assumed that they were kind of linked.

Yeah, Destroy now seems to suggest that we would be getting rid of mecha-Cthulhu as planned, but opening the door for the original recipe Cthulhu to return and dominate the galaxy.

Modifié par Big_Boss9, 28 août 2012 - 05:57 .


#14819
CoolioThane

CoolioThane
  • Members
  • 2 537 messages
I didn't tell you to kill yourself. Dirt mounds are like 4 cm high you muppet

#14820
The Heretic of Time

The Heretic of Time
  • Members
  • 5 612 messages

jgibson14352 wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

jgibson14352 wrote...

@hanar leviathan never controlled a reaper, he took control of ground forces, just like the illusive man did on sanctuary


Leviathan did control a reaper. That's how they took it down at the end of the DLC. The reaper struggles and crashes inside the ocean, but we don't see the reaper suffering from any real physical damage. To me it was clear that the Leviathans took over the reaper and "pressed the off-button", just like they're capable of doing with organics, as we saw earlier in the DLC.


So by that logic the leviathan controlled the shuttle and the countless crashed ships? Its pretty obvious its just some kind of EMP-like weapon


It did not seem like the reaper just went through the EMP-shield-thingy. Reapers are not THAT dumb. It clearly struggled before it crash-landed too. Not to mention the fact that we see the Leviathan spheres lighting up just before that. You know, the spheres the Leviathans use to control others.

So we see the spheres, then we see the reaper struggle, then we see him crashing. Could this be any more obvious? The Leviathans assumed direct control over this reaper! :o

#14821
Jaze55

Jaze55
  • Members
  • 1 071 messages

CoolioThane wrote...

I didn't tell you to kill yourself. Dirt mounds are like 4 cm high you muppet


That's the 4th insult while I have made zero. I really, really love you guys. I mean that from the bottom of my heart. 

#14822
EpyonX3

EpyonX3
  • Members
  • 2 374 messages
"Vanguard of our destruction, huh? How's that working out, big guy?"

Owned.

#14823
CoolioThane

CoolioThane
  • Members
  • 2 537 messages
Christ aren't you precious?!

You have been a passive-aggressive arse though

#14824
jgibson14352

jgibson14352
  • Members
  • 415 messages
DP, sorry my phone thinks edit=quote

Modifié par jgibson14352, 28 août 2012 - 06:05 .


#14825
jgibson14352

jgibson14352
  • Members
  • 415 messages

jgibson14352 wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

jgibson14352 wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

jgibson14352 wrote...

@hanar leviathan never controlled a reaper, he took control of ground forces, just like the illusive man did on sanctuary


Leviathan did control a reaper. That's how they took it down at the end of the DLC. The reaper struggles and crashes inside the ocean, but we don't see the reaper suffering from any real physical damage. To me it was clear that the Leviathans took over the reaper and "pressed the off-button", just like they're capable of doing with organics, as we saw earlier in the DLC.


So by that logic the leviathan controlled the shuttle and the countless crashed ships? Its pretty obvious its just some kind of EMP-like weapon


It did not seem like the reaper just went through the EMP-shield-thingy. Reapers are not THAT dumb. It clearly struggled before it crash-landed too. Not to mention the fact that we see the Leviathan spheres lighting up just before that. You know, the spheres the Leviathans use to control others.

So we see the spheres, then we see the reaper struggle, then we see him crashing. Could this be any more obvious? The Leviathans assumed direct control over this reaper! :o


The shuttle struggled too. Why wouldn't they use an intact reaper body to help the war effort? Think how useful thatd be


Modifié par jgibson14352, 28 août 2012 - 06:03 .