Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
80611 réponses à ce sujet

#15126
Arashi08

Arashi08
  • Members
  • 612 messages
Sooo...what's this "god powers" thing some ppl are saying Shepard got from Leviathan? You mean the Dominate power? I used that all the time in ME2, and was sad when it wasn't in the game. I don't think it's fair to say it is "god power" though, since you could get it in ME2 and all lol.

Then again, I don't know how it changed from ME2 since I had to work right after finishing it? can anyone enlighten me on how it has changed from ME2?

EDIT...how the hell did "I" get in the word "god?"...fail...Posted Image

Modifié par Arashi08, 29 août 2012 - 02:28 .


#15127
Big_Boss9

Big_Boss9
  • Members
  • 532 messages

Jere85 wrote...

I hear these things about Shepard being able to control reapers? Is that just some hocus pocus? Or did i miss something in the DLC?


Shepard directly? No, but there's this war asset (Leviathan Enthrallment Team):

A mixed-species team of special-operations soldiers have volunteered to covertly deliver Leviathan artifacts behind enemy lines. These attacks aim to make Reaper creatures thralls of the Leviathans. On a small scale, this could cause chaos and disruption. On a large scale--and if given enough time--it could form an army of Reaper creatures dedicated to exterminating their own kind. The team's major limiting factors are the small number of artifacts and the reluctance of Alliance commanders to operate openly with such a potent weapon for fear the Reapers might develop a countermeasure.


Modifié par Big_Boss9, 29 août 2012 - 02:23 .


#15128
CoolioThane

CoolioThane
  • Members
  • 2 537 messages
 
Posted Image

Punny - scares me :(

Very different to the paintings of the thralls

Posted Image This slendy is the middle of the three in the top photo

Modifié par CoolioThane, 29 août 2012 - 02:22 .


#15129
Krogan Warlord

Krogan Warlord
  • Members
  • 60 messages

SwobyJ wrote...

Krogan Warlord wrote...

"The mental damage from indoctrination is severe and permanent. As
Shepard saw, the captured salarians on Virmire had been turned into
shambling husks, who either attacked on sight or just stood awaiting
orders. Only people with immense mental strength are able to resist
indoctrination, and even then, only for a short time.
"
Directly from Mass Effect Codex.
Codex


Yet there's also the 'months and years' part too.

I believe that your quote there is in regards to full-intensity of indoctrination signals.

(indoc can be spread through signals, nanides, and more)


And rapid Indoctrination makes the victim highly unstable.Didn't see Shepard suffer any side-effects from Indoctrination.The Eyes in the ending is just Shepards cybernetic implants as his skin being melted.The Catalyst appears as a child because he has been monitoring Shepard.And he took a form he could comprehend.
And Shepard is just having bad dreams.



Modifié par Krogan Warlord, 29 août 2012 - 02:25 .


#15130
McWhitey3

McWhitey3
  • Members
  • 28 messages
Board moving fast... I'll post again...I think this DLC just gave us the future villains in the next ME games. It doesn't prove or disprove anything. But I see Leviathans as the post reaper villains to continue the universe. Bioware knows what they are doing and this DLC kind of shows it...IMO anyway.

#15131
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages
Wow, now isn't THAT an interesting coincidence. I just talked to James after the asteroid mission, and he mentioned the hum. I know it's just a coincidence, but still...

#15132
Jaze55

Jaze55
  • Members
  • 1 071 messages

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

MassEffected555 wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

MassEffected555 wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

EpyonX3 wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

EpyonX3 wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

Where is the evidence to support Shepard being immune to indoctrination?


1) Three entire games minus the last 10 minutes are Shepard wanting to wipe them out.
2) Leviathan wanting to study is uniqueness, why the reapers see him as a threat.
3) Harbinger wanting to study him, dead or alive.

There is something special about Shepard that reapers and levy wants. I think it's how he can fight the reapers for so long and be successfull. 


1)Seems to be a point proving he can be indoctrinated. If he was immune, he wouldnt be tempted by two choices 
     at the last minute.

2)That can be for any number of reasons having nothing to do with indoctrination immunity. If Leviathan studies           Shepard he'll be disapointed in what he finds. Aside from a few cybernetic parts, Shepard is just another      
    human. It doesnt qualify as evidence.

3)Again that hardly qualifies as evidence. 





1) Not really. I only say this because you have the option of not killing them all. What happens if a player picks destroy? Is it that he's not indoctrinated, or is it that the player did what Shepard went there to do?

2) Then why did Levy bother having a conversation? He had Shepard in front of him and was able to enter his mind. He could have just shut him off like the others and did what he wanted. Perhaps it's because he couldn't. If he could study why he couldn't, then maybe he could stop the reapers from indoctrinating anyone the next cycle, making it more difficult for the harvest to proceeed. 

3) Harbinger could have been to indoctrinate him each time they had an encounter and failed. Such a thing needs to be studied so that if it happens the next cycle, they can be prepared.

Each side wants Shepard for the same reason but for different purposes. And they both have to do with indoctrination.



I haven't played leviathan yet but I'll get to it by tomorrow sometime I hope. So I'll just respond to 1 and 3

     The theory asserts that Shepard is undergoing the process of indoctrination throughout the game. This is not  
     the same as being completely and fully indoctrinated. Were Shepard completely indoctrinated, there wouldnt be
     much of a story left to tell as Shepard would be out there doing the Reapers'  bidding. 

     The ending comes down to you resisting indoctrination and staying commited to destroying the reapers, or  
     ultimately succumbing to indoctrination and falling in line with their goals. The synthesis choice makes it more
     obvious. Thecatalyst claims choosing it will fuse synthetic and organic dna into something new, causing
     everyone to reach the pinnacle of evolution. What are reapers? A combination of synthetics and organics.
     And what do they already consider themselves? The pinnacle of evolution.

     Its an absurd idea for Shepard to be the only one in millions of years to be immune to indoctrination. Shepard
     being immune to indoctrination does so much damage to the trilogy and introduces so many plotholes its not
     even funny. 

   

     



I agree about him being immune damaging the series. I also have always stated having Shepard be the ONLY one to ever BE indoctrinated and then break out of it -besides to kill themselves- would also damage the series. That is THE biggest reason I hate  the indoc theory, because it breaks the lore. 



Not break free. Resist. You're implying he purges indoctrination from his system entirely. That is not what the theory is suggesting. Big difference.


Maybe you can answer this for me then where others have failed.

How exactly does he resist? Is he indoctrinated or isnt he? I never heard of someone being in the process of indoctrination where the are already seeing visions as .... breaking out? Resisting? See to me resisting would mean NOTHING at all happens. I've linked the codex where it says once you start seeing things blah blah you are indoctrinated. 

So where exactly is he either not indoctrinated, or where IS he indoctrinated so he can resist, OR (sorry these are real questions) where is it that he feels the indoctrination happening but then he resists?


           Certainly. First off many people confuse being fully indoctrinated with undergoing the process of indoctrination. As the codex suggests, slow and patient indoctrination achieves the best result: A thrall that can build up gradually and last for months or years. Below is the excerpt from the codex entry on indoctrination that will help answer your question:

"Organics undergoing indoctrination may complain of headaches and buzzing or ringing in their ears. As time passes, they have feelings of "being watched" and hallucinations of "ghostly" presences."

          Shepard is slowly undergoing indoctrination. As the excerpt suggests, those undergoing the process can and will experience the symptoms, as Shepard does. This is completely different  than being fully indoctrinated. Were that the case, Shepard would be like Saren, fully in line with the Reapers' goals and hell bent on helping them accomplish them. 

           Make no mistake. Resist does not mean break free from permanently. It in no way implies nothing happened. You can resist an addition, but are you ever really free from it forever?

           The ending is one last battle in Shepard's mind against Reaper indoctrination. Will you resist it and keep to your goal to destroy the reapers? Or will you give in and fall in line with the reapers' goals. You either resist indoctrination, or you give into it.

            And I say you because it is as much your battle against indoctrination as it is Shepard's. Have you ever looked at the decision chamber's layout and wondered why are the choices colored renegade red and paragon blue? When has Shepard ever associated morale decisions with colors? He has never, but you have. With the only correct choice put in such a bad light, it is no wonder many fail to resist. 


OK I hear you and that's the first time someone explained it that well to me, thank you.

Now, and this is my opinion, but the goal is to STOP the Reapers right? At any cost. Kill them is never stated, its STOP them. I never pick control, but I should to see it. I have picked Synthesis and Destroy (and refuse just to see it). To me killing an entire species, the Geth (even though I as a real human don't believe a machine can ever be "alive") as wrong so I picked synthesis my first playthrough. Renegade picked Destroy because, well, I already killed the Geth lol. 

So I guess what I am saying is, are ANY of the endings the wrong choice besides refuse? Every single ending - minus refuse - has Shepard doing exactly what he wanted to do, stop the Reaper threat. So why is Destroy the only good ending. Or better yet, why is destroy the only RIGHT ending? That's what bothers people I think. I know it kind of pissed me off being told I chose the "wrong" ending when I actually sat there for a good 5 minutes thinking about them and based my first choice (synthesis) off my own moral standings. Reapers are no longer a threat, everyone lives and evolves and ...... well my crew gets stuck on some random planet. Good times. 

edit- spelling

Modifié par MassEffected555, 29 août 2012 - 02:27 .


#15133
Jere85

Jere85
  • Members
  • 1 542 messages
http://social.biowar...ndex/13884727/1

Nice post by The Angry One.
I tend to agree with most of it.

#15134
Arashi08

Arashi08
  • Members
  • 612 messages
Didn't Leviathan say the "intelligence" it created became the first Reaper aka Harbinger?

#15135
CoolioThane

CoolioThane
  • Members
  • 2 537 messages
NO YOUR GOAL IS TO DESTROY THE REAPERS

#15136
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

MassEffected555 wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

MassEffected555 wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

MassEffected555 wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

EpyonX3 wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

EpyonX3 wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

Where is the evidence to support Shepard being immune to indoctrination?


1) Three entire games minus the last 10 minutes are Shepard wanting to wipe them out.
2) Leviathan wanting to study is uniqueness, why the reapers see him as a threat.
3) Harbinger wanting to study him, dead or alive.

There is something special about Shepard that reapers and levy wants. I think it's how he can fight the reapers for so long and be successfull. 


1)Seems to be a point proving he can be indoctrinated. If he was immune, he wouldnt be tempted by two choices 
     at the last minute.

2)That can be for any number of reasons having nothing to do with indoctrination immunity. If Leviathan studies           Shepard he'll be disapointed in what he finds. Aside from a few cybernetic parts, Shepard is just another      
    human. It doesnt qualify as evidence.

3)Again that hardly qualifies as evidence. 





1) Not really. I only say this because you have the option of not killing them all. What happens if a player picks destroy? Is it that he's not indoctrinated, or is it that the player did what Shepard went there to do?

2) Then why did Levy bother having a conversation? He had Shepard in front of him and was able to enter his mind. He could have just shut him off like the others and did what he wanted. Perhaps it's because he couldn't. If he could study why he couldn't, then maybe he could stop the reapers from indoctrinating anyone the next cycle, making it more difficult for the harvest to proceeed. 

3) Harbinger could have been to indoctrinate him each time they had an encounter and failed. Such a thing needs to be studied so that if it happens the next cycle, they can be prepared.

Each side wants Shepard for the same reason but for different purposes. And they both have to do with indoctrination.



I haven't played leviathan yet but I'll get to it by tomorrow sometime I hope. So I'll just respond to 1 and 3

     The theory asserts that Shepard is undergoing the process of indoctrination throughout the game. This is not  
     the same as being completely and fully indoctrinated. Were Shepard completely indoctrinated, there wouldnt be
     much of a story left to tell as Shepard would be out there doing the Reapers'  bidding. 

     The ending comes down to you resisting indoctrination and staying commited to destroying the reapers, or  
     ultimately succumbing to indoctrination and falling in line with their goals. The synthesis choice makes it more
     obvious. Thecatalyst claims choosing it will fuse synthetic and organic dna into something new, causing
     everyone to reach the pinnacle of evolution. What are reapers? A combination of synthetics and organics.
     And what do they already consider themselves? The pinnacle of evolution.

     Its an absurd idea for Shepard to be the only one in millions of years to be immune to indoctrination. Shepard
     being immune to indoctrination does so much damage to the trilogy and introduces so many plotholes its not
     even funny. 

   

     



I agree about him being immune damaging the series. I also have always stated having Shepard be the ONLY one to ever BE indoctrinated and then break out of it -besides to kill themselves- would also damage the series. That is THE biggest reason I hate  the indoc theory, because it breaks the lore. 



Not break free. Resist. You're implying he purges indoctrination from his system entirely. That is not what the theory is suggesting. Big difference.


Maybe you can answer this for me then where others have failed.

How exactly does he resist? Is he indoctrinated or isnt he? I never heard of someone being in the process of indoctrination where the are already seeing visions as .... breaking out? Resisting? See to me resisting would mean NOTHING at all happens. I've linked the codex where it says once you start seeing things blah blah you are indoctrinated. 

So where exactly is he either not indoctrinated, or where IS he indoctrinated so he can resist, OR (sorry these are real questions) where is it that he feels the indoctrination happening but then he resists?


           Certainly. First off many people confuse being fully indoctrinated with undergoing the process of indoctrination. As the codex suggests, slow and patient indoctrination achieves the best result: A thrall that can build up gradually and last for months or years. Below is the excerpt from the codex entry on indoctrination that will help answer your question:

"Organics undergoing indoctrination may complain of headaches and buzzing or ringing in their ears. As time passes, they have feelings of "being watched" and hallucinations of "ghostly" presences."

          Shepard is slowly undergoing indoctrination. As the excerpt suggests, those undergoing the process can and will experience the symptoms, as Shepard does. This is completely different  than being fully indoctrinated. Were that the case, Shepard would be like Saren, fully in line with the Reapers' goals and hell bent on helping them accomplish them. 

           Make no mistake. Resist does not mean break free from permanently. It in no way implies nothing happened. You can resist an addition, but are you ever really free from it forever?

           The ending is one last battle in Shepard's mind against Reaper indoctrination. Will you resist it and keep to your goal to destroy the reapers? Or will you give in and fall in line with the reapers' goals. You either resist indoctrination, or you give into it.

            And I say you because it is as much your battle against indoctrination as it is Shepard's. Have you ever looked at the decision chamber's layout and wondered why are the choices colored renegade red and paragon blue? When has Shepard ever associated morale decisions with colors? He has never, but you have. With the only correct choice put in such a bad light, it is no wonder many fail to resist. 


OK I hear you and that's the first time someone explained it that well to me, thank you.

Now, and this is my opinion, but the goal is to STOP the reapers right? At any cost. Kill them is never stated, its STOP them. I never pick control, but I should to see it. I have picked Synthesis and Destroy (and refuse just to see it). To me killing an entire species, the Geth (even though I as a real human don't believe a machine can ever be "alive") as wrong so I picked syntheses my first playthrough. Renegade picked Destroy because, well, I already killed the Geth lol. 

So I guess what I am saying is, are ANY of the endings the wrong choice besides refuse? Every single ending - minus refuse - has Shepard doing exactly what he wanted to do, stop the Reaper threat. So why is Destroy the only good ending. Or better yet, why is destroy the only RIGHT ending? That's what bothers people I think. I know it kind of pissed me off being told I chose the "wrong" ending when I actually sat there for a good 5 minutes thinking about them and based my first choice (synthesis) off my own moral standings. Reapers are no longer a threat, everyone lives and evolves and ...... well my crew gets stuck on some random planet. Good times. 


OK, I'm not going to start talking about just how sick and wrong Synthesis is.  Rather, I'm going to ask you guys this: for the love of the Homeworld!  KILL THAT QUOTE PYRAMID!  Chris has already warned us about those once, I don't want him to come back and warn us about them AGAIN.

#15137
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

Arashi08 wrote...

Didn't Leviathan say the "intelligence" it created became the first Reaper aka Harbinger?


Really?  I'll have to see about that when I finish Leviathan tomorrow.  If so, then Star-Brat is still... well, something.

#15138
EpyonX3

EpyonX3
  • Members
  • 2 374 messages

Arashi08 wrote...

Didn't Leviathan say the "intelligence" it created became the first Reaper aka Harbinger?


No the intelligence wasn't Harbinger, the first reaper it created was Harbinger.

#15139
Auralius Carolus

Auralius Carolus
  • Members
  • 1 424 messages

Krogan Warlord wrote...


And rapid Indoctrination makes the victim highly unstable.Didn't see Shepard suffer any side-effects from Indoctrination.The Eyes in the ending is just Shepards cybernetic implants as his skin being melted.The Catalyst appears as a child because he has been monitoring Shepard.And he took a form he could comprehend.


Shepard, if initially Indoctrinated with Object Rho, would have had around 6 months to "incubate". "Rapid" indoctrination would require less than a few weeks, based on what evidence is available.

Unless Leviathan changed the effects of Control and Synth, those ARE NOT his implants. There is a distinct alteration to color and pattern.

The catalyst's form suggests a clear awareness of Shepards mind; as you said, he's likely been monitored.

#15140
Krogan Warlord

Krogan Warlord
  • Members
  • 60 messages

Auralius Carolus wrote...

Krogan Warlord wrote...


And rapid Indoctrination makes the victim highly unstable.Didn't see Shepard suffer any side-effects from Indoctrination.The Eyes in the ending is just Shepards cybernetic implants as his skin being melted.The Catalyst appears as a child because he has been monitoring Shepard.And he took a form he could comprehend.


Shepard, if initially Indoctrinated with Object Rho, would have had around 6 months to "incubate". "Rapid" indoctrination would require less than a few weeks, based on what evidence is available.

Unless Leviathan changed the effects of Control and Synth, those ARE NOT his implants. There is a distinct alteration to color and pattern.

The catalyst's form suggests a clear awareness of Shepards mind; as you said, he's likely been monitored.



Look at this
ME2 Renegade Face
Note the eyes.The Triangle. 3 circles.Just red color.The color maybe changed because of the energy his body was draining from the cruicible.Green,blue?

Modifié par Krogan Warlord, 29 août 2012 - 02:37 .


#15141
Gwyphon

Gwyphon
  • Members
  • 810 messages
I think James Vega is indoctrinated by the reapers. He came out of freaking no where to help you trace the Leviathan so the reapers could follow... Huh.

#15142
EpyonX3

EpyonX3
  • Members
  • 2 374 messages

Gwyphon wrote...

I think James Vega is indoctrinated by the reapers. He came out of freaking no where to help you trace the Leviathan so the reapers could follow... Huh.


I don't think so. However, he did get bitten by the husk head, it may have started there. The medigel didn't work!

#15143
Big_Boss9

Big_Boss9
  • Members
  • 532 messages
The Husk head rules. I wish we had it in ME1 and could troll the Council with it just before disconnecting.

#15144
Gwyphon

Gwyphon
  • Members
  • 810 messages
I think the main point if the DLC is that the Leviathan stated that the AI is not preserving life, it's collecting "data" for something. It built the mass relays to make the cycles more efficient to get this "data" (the harvested races) on a more regular basis, all in some attempt to ultimately preserve organic life or something? Probably slow to this but I got stuck on the damn glitched ladder for half an hour...

#15145
Jere85

Jere85
  • Members
  • 1 542 messages

Gwyphon wrote...
Probably slow to this but I got stuck on the damn glitched ladder for half an hour...

Hah, i met that ladder.

Modifié par Jere85, 29 août 2012 - 02:51 .


#15146
Lokanaiya

Lokanaiya
  • Members
  • 685 messages
Alright, I just finished the DLC, and I personally though it was great. It was very spooky and ominous, especially that scene where the first leviathan rose out of the pit. And when they influenced the Reaper to crash into the water.... wow. Chilling. :o Anyways, after reading some of the posts here, I just wanted to say that it's rather early to declare that this proved/disproved IT. It's still fresh in our minds, and it's rather hard to accurately gauge the impact of things like this immediately after seeing/playing through it. Remember EC and how it caused many ITers to think IT had been disproven? And how, after looking at it some more later, we found out that it actually strengthened IT a great deal?

Secondly... what's with all the feeding of the trolls? Haven't we learned better than that by now? And yes, I called them trolls, because they came on this thread solely to insist that we're delusional, Levithan OBVIOUSLY completely destroyed IT, and oh yeah, that piece of really old evidence makes no sense and we should totally argue about that instead of discussing Leviathan.

Seriously? Can we stop talking about how Shepard is immune to indoctrination or how he never shows any signs of it? AGAIN?!?

On a different note, has anyone been able to go through the endings again with the Leviathan and see all the changes?

#15147
Krogan Warlord

Krogan Warlord
  • Members
  • 60 messages

Lokanaiya wrote...

Alright, I just finished the DLC, and I personally though it was great. It was very spooky and ominous, especially that scene where the first leviathan rose out of the pit. And when they influenced the Reaper to crash into the water.... wow. Chilling. :o Anyways, after reading some of the posts here, I just wanted to say that it's rather early to declare that this proved/disproved IT. It's still fresh in our minds, and it's rather hard to accurately gauge the impact of things like this immediately after seeing/playing through it. Remember EC and how it caused many ITers to think IT had been disproven? And how, after looking at it some more later, we found out that it actually strengthened IT a great deal?

Secondly... what's with all the feeding of the trolls? Haven't we learned better than that by now? And yes, I called them trolls, because they came on this thread solely to insist that we're delusional, Levithan OBVIOUSLY completely destroyed IT, and oh yeah, that piece of really old evidence makes no sense and we should totally argue about that instead of discussing Leviathan.

Seriously? Can we stop talking about how Shepard is immune to indoctrination or how he never shows any signs of it? AGAIN?!?

On a different note, has anyone been able to go through the endings again with the Leviathan and see all the changes?


No changes at all.

Modifié par Krogan Warlord, 29 août 2012 - 03:07 .


#15148
Gwyphon

Gwyphon
  • Members
  • 810 messages
Also Leviathan's "indoctrination" caused Shepard to bleed from the nose. Shepard is bleeding from the nose the entire end sequence. Proooobably due to the death laser to the face, but hey...

Lokanaiya wrote...

On a different note, has anyone been able to go through the endings again with the Leviathan and see all the changes?

This...

#15149
Arashi08

Arashi08
  • Members
  • 612 messages

EpyonX3 wrote...

Arashi08 wrote...

Didn't Leviathan say the "intelligence" it created became the first Reaper aka Harbinger?


No the intelligence wasn't Harbinger, the first reaper it created was Harbinger.

I don't know...maybe it was his wording coupled with barely being able to hear him and not using subtitles, but it sounded to me like the Leviathans created an intelligence and it harvested them and became the first Reaper, but again, maybe I was confused by the booming voice and wording lol.

#15150
byne

byne
  • Members
  • 7 813 messages

EpyonX3 wrote...

Gwyphon wrote...

I think James Vega is indoctrinated by the reapers. He came out of freaking no where to help you trace the Leviathan so the reapers could follow... Huh.


I don't think so. However, he did get bitten by the husk head, it may have started there. The medigel didn't work!


Poor little huskhead. All he needs is a loving owner!