demersel wrote...
TheConstantOne wrote...
***snip**
THis is really great and thought out. Nice work.
The only question I have - is for the literal interpretation.
All this suggests, that the crucible is of reaper design.
Why would they include a destroy option? And very complicated and contrived at that?
Also. If it is indeed the crucible. And it does what the Catalyst says it does, ansd we already know for a fact that the AI controlls all reapers and is most likely harbinger, but even if it isn't, why would he tell shepard that there is a destroy option at all??? I'm not trying to find mistake in your logic - this question really intrigus me.
That question bugs me too. The best I've been able to come up with when thinking from the literalist side is that by building the Crucible to completion the AI feels that organics have managed to evolve past what the AI intended and, consequently, the Reaper solution is onlying delaying the chaos and not solving anything. Destroy would thus be a valid solution for the AI (albeit an unfavored one) precisely because it would remove the Reapers and allow organics to build their own solution. While not a preferred outcome, if it does believe its solution will fail sooner than expected because the galaxy "changed the variables" then perhaps they will change them again. Basically the AI admits that it couldn't find an ideal solution before organics managed to catch up to its plans and therefore it may never find its solution at all. Why then should the AI try to control evolution when possibly the best idea possible for it to implement unassisted has failed to control evolution?
Control becomes the exact opposite end of the spectrum in the literalist view. The AI cedes power to you because its best ideas failed thanks to you. Perhaps your perspective leading the Reapers will solve the problem where the AI could not.
Therefore the 3 literalist choice become a matter of who decides the new solution for the galaxy:
Destroy=the galaxy chooses its fate
Control=Shepard chooses the galaxy's fate
Synthesis=the AI chooses the galaxy's fate
That's the best I can answer that question based on current info. All this being said, I believe in IT, personally. Specifically, I would be extremely surprised if the decision chamber was actually real. Especially since Shepard is shown to be on his knees at the beginning of the Leviathan mind chat. However, looking at things from both literal and IT perspectives gives great stroy context and also helps keep us grounded and on our toes

I'd also like to point out that regardless of interpretations of the ending, it seems that the same themes are present in each ending. The galaxy is essentially being held hostage by Reapers in 2 out of the 3 endings. Paragon or renegade, a Shepard-AI is ruling with Reapers and probably indoctrination=a dictatorship. And synthesis....see my previous post haha. The main question to be resolved at the end of ME 3 for me, literalist or IT perspective, is this: do the races of the galaxy deserve the chance to choose their own fate and their own evolution? I believe that they do and hence I choose Destroy...although when the endings first came out I tried really hard to justify Synthesis. That was...an
epic fail haha