I hate this Citadel survival debate thing. The problem literallists have to account for, is the fact that Shepard is on the underside of the Citadel tower which before the Crucible docks, it is exposed to space. It is nowhere near any of the ward arms, there is no visible access point or escape hatch visible anywhere. Shepard is knocked over, and the whole thing goes belly up. From where Shepard was there was nowhere else to go.
So how do they explain him being in the "rubble" of one of the residential ward arm areas?
The blast knocked him to one of the arms.
1. The concussive force alone would be enough to rend Shepard into microscopic unidentafiable pieces.
2. He just gets blasted through space during a massive oxygen burn event without getting scorched lungs? Oh not mention the fact that SHEPARD HAS NO LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM!!! I would ask a literallist to tell us about the last time they went for a nice spacewalk stroll around Earth without a space suit on.
There, all of you "science is your friend, Shepard woke up on the Citadel," trolls.
I have no problem with opposing opinions. Just don't come in here trying to convince those of us, who believe the IT is correct, to accept absolutely presposterous notions without any factual basis for how ANY human being could survive an event such as the one Shepard supposedly did, to wake up unharmed on the Citadel.
Modifié par desert_beagle, 03 septembre 2012 - 11:23 .