80611 réponses à ce sujet

[BatmanTurian]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Sam's right. Kind of. He's saying there is no proof of IT. Which is true. If there was absolute proof, that would be the end of the discussion. All we have is evidence. Yes, I know we have a rediculous amount of compelling evidence, but no proof. The indoctrination theory is just that: a theory. It is however, a theory like gravity, or evolution. It is the thing right below fact. It's "true."

Exactly.


EDIT: haha on top this time. Take that!

Modifié par BatmanTurian, 03 septembre 2012 - 09:09 .

[Norlond]

I'm getting tired, get some speculations going, I want you to be on page 750 when I come back

M-theory ftw!

Good night

[byne]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Sam's right. Kind of. He's saying there is no proof of IT. Which is true. If there was absolute proof, that would be the end of the discussion. All we have is evidence. Yes, I know we have a rediculous amount of compelling evidence, but no proof. The indoctrination theory is just that: a theory. It is however, a theory like gravity, or evolution. It is the thing right below fact. It's "true."

I pretty much agree. Anyone claiming IT is 100% definitely true is just being silly.

Although I dont agree with your spelling of 'rediculous.' Thats just ridiculous!

[Samtheman63]

BatmanTurian wrote...

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Sam's right. Kind of. He's saying there is no proof of IT. Which is true. If there was absolute proof, that would be the end of the discussion. All we have is evidence. Yes, I know we have a rediculous amount of compelling evidence, but no proof. The indoctrination theory is just that: a theory. It is however, a theory like gravity, or evolution. It is the thing right below fact. It's "true."

Exactly.

[BatmanTurian]

Samtheman63 wrote...

BatmanTurian wrote...

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Sam's right. Kind of. He's saying there is no proof of IT. Which is true. If there was absolute proof, that would be the end of the discussion. All we have is evidence. Yes, I know we have a rediculous amount of compelling evidence, but no proof. The indoctrination theory is just that: a theory. It is however, a theory like gravity, or evolution. It is the thing right below fact. It's "true."

Exactly.

Well, you did write it in a very confusing manner. And you mixed the meaning of proof with the meaning of evidence.

[RavenEyry]

I say there's no evidence of the proof, just proof of the evidence!

[Samtheman63]

BatmanTurian wrote...

Samtheman63 wrote...

BatmanTurian wrote...

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Sam's right. Kind of. He's saying there is no proof of IT. Which is true. If there was absolute proof, that would be the end of the discussion. All we have is evidence. Yes, I know we have a rediculous amount of compelling evidence, but no proof. The indoctrination theory is just that: a theory. It is however, a theory like gravity, or evolution. It is the thing right below fact. It's "true."

Exactly.

Well, you did write it in a very confusing manner. And you mixed the meaning of proof with the meaning of evidence.

yeah i read one of my posts back, doesn't make too much sense

[BansheeOwnage]

byne wrote...

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Sam's right. Kind of. He's saying there is no proof of IT. Which is true. If there was absolute proof, that would be the end of the discussion. All we have is evidence. Yes, I know we have a rediculous amount of compelling evidence, but no proof. The indoctrination theory is just that: a theory. It is however, a theory like gravity, or evolution. It is the thing right below fact. It's "true."

I pretty much agree. Anyone claiming IT is 100% definitely true is just being silly.

Although I dont agree with your spelling of 'rediculous.' Thats just ridiculous!

Goddam it. [/Zaeed]

[paxxton]

Norlond wrote...

Analogy: Gravity's confirmed and quantum mechanics are confirmed, but they're both not 100% true

What do you mean not 100% true?

[BansheeOwnage]

Auralius Carolus wrote...

demersel wrote...

 Choose wisely - only one is true cola

I reject your choices! *drinks Mello Yello

Repost for the enjoyment of everyone!

[Home run MF]

"Ah yes valid interpretation" we have dismissed that claim.

[Norlond]

paxxton wrote...

Norlond wrote...

Analogy: Gravity's confirmed and quantum mechanics are confirmed, but they're both not 100% true

What do you mean not 100% true?

Ever tried to combine both theories?

Ok, but now I'm gone, see you tomorrow

[paxxton]

Norlond wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Norlond wrote...

Analogy: Gravity's confirmed and quantum mechanics are confirmed, but they're both not 100% true

What do you mean not 100% true?

Ever tried to combine both theories?

Ok, but now I'm gone, see you tomorrow

They are probably special cases of a more general theory. Still not found though.

[spotlessvoid]

I was starting to feel pretty down about the chances of IT ever coming to fruition last night. Jgibson talked me off the ledge. Thanks bro. So I went back and just replayed the end starting at the citadel and it reconfirmed at least one thing for me. There are a lot of clues that IT was intentional and I'm still keeping faith that Bioware knows what they're doing, weird as their behavior sometimes seems. Plus, you people are awesome and I just can't stay away!

[RavenEyry]

paxxton wrote...

Norlond wrote...

Analogy: Gravity's confirmed and quantum mechanics are confirmed, but they're both not 100% true

What do you mean not 100% true?

It's not undisbutably correct, but people who reject it entirely are generally considered nutters.

[BatmanTurian]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Auralius Carolus wrote...

demersel wrote...

 Choose wisely - only one is true cola
*snip*

I reject your choices! *drinks Mello Yello

Repost for the enjoyment of everyone!

I like pepsi and coke, so obviously I want to control everything before I destroy all of it.

Modifié par BatmanTurian, 03 septembre 2012 - 09:19 .

[paxxton]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Auralius Carolus wrote...

demersel wrote...

 Choose wisely - only one is true cola

I reject your choices! *drinks Mello Yello

Repost for the enjoyment of everyone!

Can't do both?

[BatmanTurian]

spotlessvoid wrote...

I was starting to feel pretty down about the chances of IT ever coming to fruition last night. Jgibson talked me off the ledge. Thanks bro. So I went back and just replayed the end starting at the citadel and it reconfirmed at least one thing for me. There are a lot of clues that IT was intentional and I'm still keeping faith that Bioware knows what they're doing, weird as their behavior sometimes seems. Plus, you people are awesome and I just can't stay away!

Good. Stick around. We like ya'.

[estebanus]

spotlessvoid wrote...

I was starting to feel pretty down about the chances of IT ever coming to fruition last night. Jgibson talked me off the ledge. Thanks bro. So I went back and just replayed the end starting at the citadel and it reconfirmed at least one thing for me. There are a lot of clues that IT was intentional and I'm still keeping faith that Bioware knows what they're doing, weird as their behavior sometimes seems. Plus, you people are awesome and I just can't stay away!

You wouldn't need to stay away just because you're not an ITer. I think most people here would embrace everyone here who are friendly and smart, regardless of their allegiances.

[RavenEyry]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Auralius Carolus wrote...

demersel wrote...

 Choose wisely - only one is true cola

I reject your choices! *drinks Mello Yello

Repost for the enjoyment of everyone!

IT is diet coke then. All the fun of destroy without the negative consequences.

[estebanus]

Norlond wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Norlond wrote...

Analogy: Gravity's confirmed and quantum mechanics are confirmed, but they're both not 100% true

What do you mean not 100% true?

Ever tried to combine both theories?

Ok, but now I'm gone, see you tomorrow

*Sudden flashback to when Masster Blaster was talking about combining non-IT and IT heories into one mega theory*

Yeah... Let's not go there.

[BansheeOwnage]

Home run MF wrote...

"Ah yes valid interpretation" we have dismissed that claim.

[paxxton]

RavenEyry wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Norlond wrote...

Analogy: Gravity's confirmed and quantum mechanics are confirmed, but they're both not 100% true

What do you mean not 100% true?

It's not undisbutably correct, but people who reject it entirely are generally considered nutters.

I read about QM some time ago. It can get pretty bizarre. Poor kitty might die or live or both.

[BatmanTurian]

estebanus wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

I was starting to feel pretty down about the chances of IT ever coming to fruition last night. Jgibson talked me off the ledge. Thanks bro. So I went back and just replayed the end starting at the citadel and it reconfirmed at least one thing for me. There are a lot of clues that IT was intentional and I'm still keeping faith that Bioware knows what they're doing, weird as their behavior sometimes seems. Plus, you people are awesome and I just can't stay away!

You wouldn't need to stay away just because you're not an ITer. I think most people here would embrace everyone here who are friendly and smart, regardless of their allegiances.

We've put up with Epyon, afterall.

[estebanus]

Home run MF wrote...

"Ah yes valid interpretation" we have dismissed that claim.

omg r u srs.

Translation: Oh my god, are you serious?