I'm hoping it will be the announcement of DLC. It's been long enough.D.Sharrah wrote...
How's the Atlas smashing going for everyone? Any guesses on what the message from Hackett is going to be post op? I am hoping that it is going to foreshadow incoming DLC...Also, do you think that the op puts the MP timeline around the coup attempt?
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 22 septembre 2012 - 07:18 .
paxxton wrote...
No idea. But change is coming to BioWare.masster blaster wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Patrick Weekes moved to the DA team. But it's too early to draw any conclusion about all those maneuvers.masster blaster wrote...
paxxton wrote...
It's strange they decided to leave right now when BioWare seems to be in a downfall. Even stranger that they decided to do it at the same time.masster blaster wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Yet unknown. I'm curious to see where this is going. Anyway, they confirmed to be working on ME3 DLC, ME full game and a completely new franchise by the ME team.masster blaster wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Hi. This http://blog.bioware....zeschuk-retire/ and a few speculations on possible continuations to ME3.masster blaster wrote...
"What is my biding my master?"
So what have I misses d?
Is Bioware dispanding, or are we just going crazy?
You think it could be a cover up, or do you think they are trying to go rogue, and break away from EA?
And what other Bioware people have left, and maybe we should try to connect the people that are/ retired from Bioware that were working on ME, or ME2 that left.
What are they planing? Dragon age meets Mass Effect?
BansheeOwnage wrote...
It's only like 3 minutes...Dwailing wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
You see my secret ending video?Dwailing wrote...
So, anything new? Also, Age of Mythology kicks butt. I'd almost forgotten how awesome it was. Almost, but not quite.
Part of it. I didn't watch the whole thing.
masster blaster wrote...
What are they planing? Dragon age meets Mass Effect?
The first one could work, but it would make a lot of folks unhappy me thinks.BansheeOwnage wrote...
2 things could happen.Fiery Phoenix wrote...
Also, assuming CleverNoob's description of Project X is even true, it still doesn't explain what happens in regards to those who picked Control and Synthesis. I simply can't see BioWare disregarding those others choices just because one ending happens to have Shepard alive. It may sound fine on paper, but I really do not see how it would work from a practical point of view.
1. You have some cinematic and or interactive new section where with Shepard being indoctrinated and trying to kill her squadmates or LI or something. Maybe the LI has to kill her. That would be heartwrenching.
2. They leave those 2 endings as is, and allow players to have both a literal or IT ending. It would be interesting.
BansheeOwnage wrote...
You see my secret ending video?
That's funny, but you should cut the wall above you. Did you find any parts funny at all?Dwailing wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
It's only like 3 minutes...Dwailing wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
You see my secret ending video?Dwailing wrote...
So, anything new? Also, Age of Mythology kicks butt. I'd almost forgotten how awesome it was. Almost, but not quite.
Part of it. I didn't watch the whole thing.
I can fall into this trope at times:
http://tvtropes.org/...wersAreGoldfish
Dwailing wrote...
snip..
I don't think it's backlash over the endings. If that was what it was, I get the feeling that Hudson and Walters would have "left." You know, since they're the ones most blamed for this, and since I get the feeling that if this really WAS literal, that they would have been the ones responsible.
And here you go.byne wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
You see my secret ending video?
I dont think I did.
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 22 septembre 2012 - 07:23 .
BansheeOwnage wrote...
I'm hoping it will be the announcement of DLC. It's been long enough.D.Sharrah wrote...
How's the Atlas smashing going for everyone? Any guesses on what the message from Hackett is going to be post op? I am hoping that it is going to foreshadow incoming DLC...Also, do you think that the op puts the MP timeline around the coup attempt?
Top! Yeah! Where's Estebanus?
BansheeOwnage wrote...
And here you go.byne wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
You see my secret ending video?
I dont think I did.
Note: I'd appreciate some comments or constructive criticism from anyone.
). It is not unusual to move on, when you think you've done everything in a specific field. It's never too late for a fresh start.
Modifié par Restrider, 22 septembre 2012 - 07:35 .
byne wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
And here you go.byne wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
You see my secret ending video?
I dont think I did.
Note: I'd appreciate some comments or constructive criticism from anyone.
I like it!
My favorite video making fun of the endings is still the Space Magic one.
Partly because it syncs up so well (I mean, like one comment says, 2:06 is pretty amazing), but also partly because I made it.
I know the feeling. I didn't really want to make that video make sense though. But really, I want to ask them what they were thinking. If it wasn't IT, what the hell is wrong with them? 5 minutes after Shepard convinces the control-advocating TIM he's wrong, Shepard can control the reapers? No. Especially not with all of the foreshadowing about tough decisions that aren't easy and require sacrifice.D.Sharrah wrote...
@Banshee: The vid was ok. It makes me want to get the writers in a locked room and pry all of their thoughts behind the endings out of them...I get the feeling that although we may be close with IT - there's something that we just haven't figured out...
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 22 septembre 2012 - 07:37 .
D.Sharrah wrote...
byne wrote...
My favorite video making fun of the endings is still the Space Magic one.
Partly because it syncs up so well (I mean, like one comment says, 2:06 is pretty amazing), but also partly because I made it.
Scary.
Fiery Phoenix wrote...
The first one could work, but it would make a lot of folks unhappy me thinks.BansheeOwnage wrote...
2 things could happen.Fiery Phoenix wrote...
Also, assuming CleverNoob's description of Project X is even true, it still doesn't explain what happens in regards to those who picked Control and Synthesis. I simply can't see BioWare disregarding those others choices just because one ending happens to have Shepard alive. It may sound fine on paper, but I really do not see how it would work from a practical point of view.
1. You have some cinematic and or interactive new section where with Shepard being indoctrinated and trying to kill her squadmates or LI or something. Maybe the LI has to kill her. That would be heartwrenching.
2. They leave those 2 endings as is, and allow players to have both a literal or IT ending. It would be interesting.
The second possibility, on the other hand, does sound interesting. In fact, I'd welcome that with open arms. Only thing is, they'd need to canonize one of the two paths at the end. It couldn't stay open forever.
Modifié par Raistlin Majare 1992, 22 septembre 2012 - 07:40 .
byne wrote...
D.Sharrah wrote...
byne wrote...
My favorite video making fun of the endings is still the Space Magic one.
Partly because it syncs up so well (I mean, like one comment says, 2:06 is pretty amazing), but also partly because I made it.
Scary.
It matches up so well its almost like they made the endings planning on having that music in the background. Its uncanny.
BansheeOwnage wrote...
I know the feeling. I didn't really want to make that video make sense though. But really, I want to ask them what they were thinking. If it wasn't IT, what the hell is wrong with them? 5 minutes after Shepard convinces the control-advocating TIM he's wrong, Shepard can control the reapers? No. Especially not with all of the foreshadowing about tough decisions that aren't easy and require sacrifice.D.Sharrah wrote...
@Banshee: The vid was ok. It makes me want to get the writers in a locked room and pry all of their thoughts behind the endings out of them...I get the feeling that although we may be close with IT - there's something that we just haven't figured out...
I mean, this is basic writing stuff that all writers know how to do...
Rifneno wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
I know the feeling. I didn't really want to make that video make sense though. But really, I want to ask them what they were thinking. If it wasn't IT, what the hell is wrong with them? 5 minutes after Shepard convinces the control-advocating TIM he's wrong, Shepard can control the reapers? No. Especially not with all of the foreshadowing about tough decisions that aren't easy and require sacrifice.D.Sharrah wrote...
@Banshee: The vid was ok. It makes me want to get the writers in a locked room and pry all of their thoughts behind the endings out of them...I get the feeling that although we may be close with IT - there's something that we just haven't figured out...
I mean, this is basic writing stuff that all writers know how to do...
I know, right? And people say they just didn't know how to end it... BS. That, too, is creative writing 101. A decent writer already has the ending worked out in their head before they write the first word.
Modifié par Raistlin Majare 1992, 22 septembre 2012 - 07:47 .
Well, I suppose by the "Rachni decision" you mean the decision we make in ME 3.Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
Fiery Phoenix wrote...
The first one could work, but it would make a lot of folks unhappy me thinks.BansheeOwnage wrote...
2 things could happen.Fiery Phoenix wrote...
Also, assuming CleverNoob's description of Project X is even true, it still doesn't explain what happens in regards to those who picked Control and Synthesis. I simply can't see BioWare disregarding those others choices just because one ending happens to have Shepard alive. It may sound fine on paper, but I really do not see how it would work from a practical point of view.
1. You have some cinematic and or interactive new section where with Shepard being indoctrinated and trying to kill her squadmates or LI or something. Maybe the LI has to kill her. That would be heartwrenching.
2. They leave those 2 endings as is, and allow players to have both a literal or IT ending. It would be interesting.
The second possibility, on the other hand, does sound interesting. In fact, I'd welcome that with open arms. Only thing is, they'd need to canonize one of the two paths at the end. It couldn't stay open forever.
Or certain events can play into Shepards indoctrination even if chooses Control/Synthesis. Choices or characters who can save the player in his darkest (with drawbacks of course). This is an old theory brought up, my paticular favorite beeing the Rachni Queen.
Mac Walter said this: “[The presence of the Rachni] has huge consequences in Mass
Effect 3. Even just in the final battle with the Reapers.”
A promise still unfulfilled. But think of what we know of the Rachni Queen. She can interact with the minds of living creatures and is resistant/immune to Indoctrination. The idea is that in case of Control/Synthesis the Rachni Queen if alive would interfere, linking with Shepards mind and giving him the resistance to break free, at least for a time. The cost to this could be the Rachni Queens death as it goes through the warzone to try and get close enough to Shepard.
This off course would not be the only of such possibilities down this route.
Modifié par Restrider, 22 septembre 2012 - 07:51 .
Restrider wrote...
Well, I suppose by the "Rachni decision" you mean the decision we make in ME 3.Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
Fiery Phoenix wrote...
The first one could work, but it would make a lot of folks unhappy me thinks.BansheeOwnage wrote...
2 things could happen.Fiery Phoenix wrote...
Also, assuming CleverNoob's description of Project X is even true, it still doesn't explain what happens in regards to those who picked Control and Synthesis. I simply can't see BioWare disregarding those others choices just because one ending happens to have Shepard alive. It may sound fine on paper, but I really do not see how it would work from a practical point of view.
1. You have some cinematic and or interactive new section where with Shepard being indoctrinated and trying to kill her squadmates or LI or something. Maybe the LI has to kill her. That would be heartwrenching.
2. They leave those 2 endings as is, and allow players to have both a literal or IT ending. It would be interesting.
The second possibility, on the other hand, does sound interesting. In fact, I'd welcome that with open arms. Only thing is, they'd need to canonize one of the two paths at the end. It couldn't stay open forever.
Or certain events can play into Shepards indoctrination even if chooses Control/Synthesis. Choices or characters who can save the player in his darkest (with drawbacks of course). This is an old theory brought up, my paticular favorite beeing the Rachni Queen.
Mac Walter said this: “[The presence of the Rachni] has huge consequences in Mass
Effect 3. Even just in the final battle with the Reapers.”
A promise still unfulfilled. But think of what we know of the Rachni Queen. She can interact with the minds of living creatures and is resistant/immune to Indoctrination. The idea is that in case of Control/Synthesis the Rachni Queen if alive would interfere, linking with Shepards mind and giving him the resistance to break free, at least for a time. The cost to this could be the Rachni Queens death as it goes through the warzone to try and get close enough to Shepard.
This off course would not be the only of such possibilities down this route.
This kind of makes sense in the following way:
Since some players, who played ME3 are able to play ME1 (PS3), and the default decision in ME2 was dead Rachni, it would kind of be depressing for these players to not be able to alter that decision (unless by using SaveEditors). Thus, they kind of repeated the decision in ME3, the important consequences remain yet to be observed.
On a side note: Do the PS3 ME2 players get the Genesis Comic for free? Would kind of make sense, imho.
Rifneno wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
I know the feeling. I didn't really want to make that video make sense though. But really, I want to ask them what they were thinking. If it wasn't IT, what the hell is wrong with them? 5 minutes after Shepard convinces the control-advocating TIM he's wrong, Shepard can control the reapers? No. Especially not with all of the foreshadowing about tough decisions that aren't easy and require sacrifice.D.Sharrah wrote...
@Banshee: The vid was ok. It makes me want to get the writers in a locked room and pry all of their thoughts behind the endings out of them...I get the feeling that although we may be close with IT - there's something that we just haven't figured out...
I mean, this is basic writing stuff that all writers know how to do...
I know, right? And people say they just didn't know how to end it... BS. That, too, is creative writing 101. A decent writer already has the ending worked out in their head before they write the first word.
Thanks.Dwailing wrote...
I just finished it Banshee. I like it.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
