190 réponses à ce sujet

[xsdob]

Time to get flamed, but after much deliberation, here it is.

ME1: 93
ME2: 95
ME3 with multiplayer: 96
ME3 Without multiplayer: 93 1/2

The multiplayer, while hated by some, is what made this for me, since it let me play with a wide array of powers, weapons, and characters I would never get to. And it fulfilled my batarian hunger, for now.

Batarian Squadmate bioware, make it happen!

[Voodoo2015]

ME1: 95
ME2: 94
ME3: 63

[legion999]

magnetite wrote...

What I mean by that is all these reviews on the internet solely base their review of the game around the last 5 minutes, and nothing else. Most of them that I've seen. Someone didn't like the last 5 minutes or so, this game gets a 3/10 without actually looking at the other parts of the game. Same thing as these reviewers who didn't like one thing about a particular product, but give it a really low score (eg. 1/5 or 2/5).

Which reviews? ‘Professional' ones? Or the fan ones? 

Anyway you need to also factor other problems like auto-dialogue, poor side missions and and other stupid mistakes (journal and Tali's face e.g.). While people may focus on the ending as a primary complaint it doesn't mean they don't have problems with other parts of the game.

PS: Apologies for being a bit of a dick in my last comment.

[LucasShark]

magnetite wrote...

legion999 wrote...

<facepalm>

Maybe, the ending subtracts from the game as a whole along with other flaws. 

And? The final game is the end? No ****.

What I mean by that is all these reviews on the internet solely base their review of the game around the last 5 minutes, and nothing else. Most of them that I've seen. Someone didn't like the last 5 minutes or so, this game gets a 3/10 without actually looking at the other parts of the game. Same thing as these reviewers who didn't like one thing about a particular product, but give it a really low score (eg. 1/5 or 2/5).

From a performance standpoint, ME3 is pretty solid. Fluid gameplay, no stuttering, and almost no crash to desktop errors. Skyrim was riddled with this stuff, yet people still gave it a 95/100 or so.

Boy have you read nothing arround here.

[Generic Screen Name]

magnetite wrote...

legion999 wrote...

Which reviews? ‘Professional' ones? Or the fan ones? 

Fan ones mostly. A game like Duke Nukem Forever certainly deserves a 50s score. ME3? No way.

Yeah, ME3 deserves a score of 20, at most.

[SpamBot2000]

ME3 can just imagine its score.

[MassStorm]

ME1: 90
ME2: 80
ME3: 60

[fchopin]

ME1: 92
ME2: 70
ME3: 90

[JimJamBimBam]

ME1: 90 - awesome intro to galaxy, great story, great villian, decent graphics, great characters, not a huge fan of the gameplay
ME2: 95 - brilliant characters, great dialouge, more lore, good story, good graphics, good gameplay, needed better side quests
ME3: 95 - fantastic story, epic scope, emotional, fantastic gameplay, desperately needed better side quests

[Karcsi9104]

ME1: 85 - great story but the gameplay is a bit bad compared to ME2 and 3
ME2: 95 - great story and good gameplay experience with fine DLCs
ME3: 60 - great start and great gameplay (rate: 95), but poor ending (rate: 25)
ME3+EC: 55 - ending is worse (rate: 20) especially when the Normandy isn't shot down right in front of the Reaper on Earth

Whole series: 90 (games), 95 (universe).

[Feanor_II]

ME1: 92
   UP: Story, exploration, dialogue
   DOWN: Inventory, combat, sidequests
ME2: 85
    UP: Dialogue, sidequests
     DOWN: Exploration, inventory/skills,story
ME3: 90
      UP: Combat, inventory/skills, story, nonFedEx sidequests
      DOWN: FedEx sidequests, exploration, autodialogue

Modifié par Feanor_II, 31 juillet 2012 - 11:21 .

[RedWolf95]

ME1 - 88
ME2 - 95
ME3 - 90

[TheRealJayDee]

ME1: 87
ME2: 81
ME3: 72

[WastedHeart]

ME1 - 75
Solid but rather dull in parts, particularly during some of the combat sections and I only liked two of the squadmates.

ME2 - 90
One of my all-time favourite games. The combat was vastly improved since ME1, and it also had better characters and far more humour. I had so much fun playing it.

ME3 - 60-70
I just felt that the writing was severely lacking at times. The opening section is dull, dull, dull and the whole crucible thing is far too convenient and would be torn to shreds if it were included as part of a film plot. The original end was appalling, but I do think the EC just about rescued it. Also, I liked less of the squadmates in this one than in ME2 and even on insanity, the combat didn't challenge me enough. Multiplayer is okay though.

Modifié par WastedHeart, 31 juillet 2012 - 12:10 .

[professor_chaos19]

ME1: 89
ME2: 84
ME3: 79

[Lonsecia]

Why'd you have to ask for a percentile score? Personally I'll just be making up arbitrary numbers in the hope they convey something of how I felt towards the game/s and so aren't even remotely accurate (I suppose one could find a way to have the games rated in specific categories with the total score being out of 100 divided by something like 5, but that feels pretty inaccurate as well).

Anyway, totally made up percentages a-go-go:

ME 1: 78-85 - It would be higher, but certain issues with the game prevent that from being possible. Mostly the combat, and the fact that with some characters the hardest fight I've ever had in the game is the one with the Krogan just after you rescue Liara (gotta love homing infinite charging Krogan that only go after you XD)

ME 2: Somewhere beteween 70-80 - Mostly lower in regards to main storyline, but higher in regards to actual gameplay than the other two games. I still can't say I love the combat, and I preferred the way weapons and gear was done in the first. Basically I felt that for everything it did right, something else was lacking, and the fact that one of those was story makes it hard to score (like it's easy to begin with).

ME 3: Somewhere between 60-75 - I was tempted to go as high as 80, but felt that'd be too easily misconstrued as meaning I thought the game was, as a whole, better than either of the previous games. Like with ME 2, it did some good things that made me forget the failings (at the time) and so though I -still- loathe the combat, I really liked some of the handling with regards to certain story-arcs. I found certain things to be utterly daft; I really didn't like Kai Leng, never liked Udina (and so hated that he was always back as the human representative - really, he's the best candidate mankind had?), I hated how it took so long to get the VS to actually trust you, the superfluous nature of ME 2 squadmates, and various other little things here and there that took away from the story feeling like a real ending.

Talking of endings, I am not actually considering that with the above score. It killed the series for me, and as such I'd be inclined to bomb their ratings (these completely fabricated ones) to represent where I am with the series.

Basically though I've used the numbers to roughly gauge that I feel the series was on a slow downhill path. Of course it's subjective, but that's how it felt to me. I still had the anticipation leading up to ME 3, but now I simply don't.

The series as a whole would therefore be somewhere in the region of 75. Honestly it should and could have been higher. The first game might look like it gets a low(ish) random numerical score from me but that's primarily because of areas the game simply didn't need to fail at. had they expanded in the right ways - making choices feel more weighty when the actual end of their arc arrives, for example - , the entire series would have been so much stronger.

I'll expand on that last point slightly: I mean by weight that I honestly thought decisions I made in ME 1 would not all affect me in a good way. I'd hoped that there'd always end up being pros and cons to all choices, but rarely did that feel the case.

[M920CAIN]

ME1 - 80
ME2 - 90
ME3 - 25

[Aaleel]

ME1 - 92
ME2 - 84
ME3 - 83

[Stalker]

ME1 - 85
ME2 - 97
ME3 - 88

[Oransel]

Rubios wrote...

darthnick427 wrote...

jreezy wrote...

Rubios wrote...

ME1: 90 (Amazing universe, top 5 this gen with Bioshock, Demon Souls, Portal and Journey)
ME2: 65 (Pointless story and CoD gameplay but overall the most polished of the three and definitely worth playing)
ME3: 80 (The same CoD gameplay but an amazing story, feels extremely rushed, could be a 95+ if released in 2013)

Palm, meet Face.

I think I hurt myself with how hard I facepalmed.....

Enjoy your brainless power spam, your "thermal" clips, your 20th century grenades, your nonsensical space magic (lol dominate/reave), your endless glorified corridors, your Michael Bay scenery and the death of every single RPG mechanic.

Even Conrad finds it silly  

In what place is ME3 plot amazing? It is bad. Really bad, even excluding endings.

[crimzontearz]

ME1 95
ME2 90
ME3 65

ME3 ending -273c

[Conniving_Eagle]

ME2 100/100 I'd have to be really nitpicky to come up with a legitimate complaint. Or maybe my opinion is just obscured by nostalgia, but I could never think of one real thing that bothered me.

ME1 90/100 Some of ME1's issues do make it harder to enjoy, but I love it all the same, and it was an incredible title for 2007.

ME3 59/100 ME3 failed. Because reasons. I'm not going to tell you so leave my artistic integrity alone!