Aller au contenu

Photo

Deception Theory: The "Catalyst" Con


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
1238 réponses à ce sujet

#176
Aquarius87

Aquarius87
  • Members
  • 36 messages

Lord Goose wrote...


I recently completed Rannoch in my Renegade playthrough. To quote.

Conversation when Reaper signal base discovered.

Legion demonstrates Reaper's upgrade.

Raan: That's a fully evolved AI.
Legion: Yes. We do not agree with goals of the Old Machines. But we find this growth... beautiful. Indicative of life.
Shepard (Renegade option "No"): Sure, they are more complex. But saying they are alive... ?
Legion: They have evolved.
Shepard: They were upgraded.
Legion: And they will die for it.
Admiral Raan: They allied with the Reapers.
Legion: To save themselves from you.
Shepard: Whatever the cost, they allied with the Reapers.
LegionL Shepard Commander, we worked with you...
Shepard (Renegade interruption): And I appreciate that. But the geth are not alive. They are machines. Machines hacked by the Reapers and they need to be shut down.


Seriously, if Catalyst is trying to persuade Shepard into taking anything than Destroy, why they use machines as argument? Especially, if that is the same kind of Shepard, who can put bullet into Mordin back, doom krogan race and use them as cannon fodder, and lost 3/4 of his/her squad to kill some Batarian slaver? That kind of Shepard who can easily make sacrifices, and willingly accept ruthless calculus of war?

If he is really doing it, Catalyst is stupid. Obviously too stupid for synthetic Machiavelly as all try to paint him.


It does make sense...throughout the Rannoch arc, the Geth are painted as inherently harmless and peace loving.
They merely acted out of defence against the Quarians.
As for EDI...she;s a member of your team since ME2, why wouldnt you feel symphatatic towards her ?

#177
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

Zso_Zso wrote...

OK, suppose OP is right, the "Catalyst" (star brat) is trying to lure Sheppard to make the synthesis choice confirming his indoctrination.

But wait! Why does the catalyst even need Sheppard to be indoctrinated ?
Since the synthesis beam is already there, the crucible does not fire the destruction wave due to the disabling device, and the Catalyst can activate it any time with or without Sheppard, then why bother trying to indoctrinate him ?


The Starchild cannot deactivate the Crucible. He can redirect it's energy like a power relay. That is the thing I call the Crucible Supression device (CSD). The thing you blow up to allow the Crucible to do what it was meant to do and would have done automatically if not for the Reaper's contraptions.

The Twilight God wrote...

8. If these are new possibilities that have just now become a reality why is there a walkway leading up to the synthesis energy beam? And why is this organic-synthetic transmogrifying beam technology already prepared and ready to go considering the very possibility just came into existence moments earlier? Many people presume that the beam is generated by the Crucible. This is not true. In fact, if you choose Refusal the Catalyst shuts it down which signifies that the synthesis beam is not a function of the Crucible (If the Catalyst can shut down the Crucible itself the CSD would not be necessary). Choose Destroy and that synthesis beam shuts off when the Crucible arms itself and then the Crucible charges up its own separate energy release. But when you choose Synthesis the current beam gets an additional energetic envelope and the Crucibles energy amplifies it. Choose Control and the synthesis beam also does not shut down before or after the Crucible’s energy extraction initiates.


Zso_Zso wrote...

I see your point about not believing the master-controller of the greatest enemy of the whole galaxy, but I still do not understand the whole point of the 3 choices!


You have TWO choices provided b the Starchild. Destroy is what the Crucible does and would have done automatically without the Reapers's contraptions. Syntheis, plan B, requires the Crucibles full energy. Control does not. If the Crucible made it unharmed then the reapers can so synthesis. If not, they have plan C: Control. Of course plan A is not letting the Crucible dock at all. If the **** hits the fan they have plan B and C there to tempt anyone way from destroy.

Zso_Zso wrote...

If in reality, Sheppard is still lying down in London near the beam knocked down by Harbinger's near-miss shot, then what difference does it make what "decision" he makes in his hallucination ?


*sigh* You didn't even read the subject matter before posting did you?

I'm gonna stop right here.

#178
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests

Arian Dynas wrote...

SMichelle wrote...

alienatedflea wrote...

destroy was the only option we had in the beginning...crucible changed that...and No, I am not indoctrinated...you damn ITers...that $h!t isnt real...



Shh....shh...it will be okay.  The ITers can't hurt you here.  This is a safe place. 



Image IPB


We don't like or want to hurt people.

Really, this just kills me.

We're not a cult, we're not a religion, we aren't some bunch of crazy conspiracy fanatics who think the government is putting mind control drugs into the water.

We're a bunch of people who looked at some weird **** going on in a videogame and thought "Hey, something ain't right here. I wonder why. Maybe it's like Inception?"

Everything in the OP is exactly what Indoctrination THEORY (Yes, THEORY, as in something that is not proven, but is based upon a hypothesis and supported by observation and logical deduction.) bases itself on. We aren't just taking a bunch of little things that could just as easily be little glitches and claiming "OFMGWTF MUST BE INDOTRINATONZ!" there's a bit of that, but it's mostly going; "Hey, that's really weird, and clearly intentional. Do you think it might be that they're trying to tell us something is not right here? What's the best explanation for that? Indoctrination? Does he have all the symptoms Bioware clearly laid out for us from past experience?"

People say we're based soley in wanting to deny reality and comfirmation bias this, logical fallacy that.

The fact is, I am a pretty big stickler for logic, I don't ascribe to conspiracy theories, I'm not paticularly religious, and I'm a big ol fan of the scientific method. If there was no logical reason to follow IT, I for one,(can't speak for everyone of course) would not. When we look at our evidence, we are pretty much the people who rip it apart the most. We consider things first before we throw them out, but if it looks pretty shaky, there's no reason to enter it into the data.

If we only wanted to deny reality, we'd stop playing the ending, not subject ourselves to it multiple times searching for weird little inconsistencies. If we wanted to deny that the ending really is WYSIWYG just because we didn't like it, we would have already written our fanfiction endings, or headcannoned it the way we wanted to, or just given up on the franchise entirely and gotten over it by now.

I would like to be happy with the Extended Cut as it is, really I would. I would love the whole issue settled, the matter done, everyone can go on being happy with the epic conclusion to Shepard's story.

But the thing is, that's not what happened.

Control, proven wrong not minutes before. In fact, do it right and you can prove TIM so wrong he shoots himself in the head for it. Why would you do a 180 on that, based solely on the word of a being who basically admits he is a Reaper? A being who basically says; "Oh yeah, that whole war of extinction thing? Yeah, that was on me, sorry guys."

As much as people say it's beautiful and wonderful, Synthesis spits in the face of Mass Effect. We saw through three games the myriad ways in which Saren and Synthesis are so dramatically wrong. We see throughout most of ME3, and both of the other games where the Reapers are, plainly and simply pure evil. They don't care for others, in fact, they're disdainful and hateful of us.

Claiming that they do what they do for some altruistic reason does not excuse what they have done; war crimes capable of making Hitler (to invoke Godwin's Law here.) and his cronies look like playground bullies by comparison.

But, maybe the reason I give Synthesis the queer eye, is simply because I don't believe in utopias.

But I suppose, either way, thanks to the OP for this "Indoctrination Theory Lite"


THANK YOU. :)

#179
Lord Goose

Lord Goose
  • Members
  • 865 messages

It does make sense...throughout the Rannoch arc, the Geth are painted as inherently harmless and peace loving.
They merely acted out of defence against the Quarians.


"The geth are not alive. They are machines. Machines hacked by the Reapers and they need to be shut down." ©

Yes, Renegade Shepard says this right after leaving Geth consensus.

As for EDI...she;s a member of your team since ME2, why wouldnt you feel symphatatic towards her ?

Renegade Shepard gunned down Mordin, Wrex and Virmire Survivor. It can kill friends rather easily. Also, EDI is not even alive according to him.

Modifié par Lord Goose, 31 juillet 2012 - 04:36 .


#180
Lord Goose

Lord Goose
  • Members
  • 865 messages

That is the thing I call the Crucible Supression device (CSD). The thing you blow up to allow the Crucible to do what it was meant to do and would have done automatically if not for the Reaper's contraptions.


I understand your idea, but it's just interpretation of the game events. The fact is that Shepard shoots down the tube to activate Crucible, but it is not explained why. It is also not explained how he even gets that idea, unless you assume that he is suddenly expert in Crucible.

#181
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 850 messages
Really interesting work OP. It was a pleasure to read.

#182
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

Leonardo the Magnificent wrote...

zambot wrote...

This is exactly why it is a good thing to finish the game with a low EMS and destroy the reaper base in ME2. If you actually accomplish very little, the StarKid only gives you the option to win the game.

Wait, what?


This ^


Win the game??? LOL Image IPBImage IPBImage IPBImage IPBImage IPB

"Your Crucible device is severely damaged. The energy it releases will destroy the relays, creating a chain reaction that will be unpredictable and devastating. Al technology and those that depend on synthetic technology for their survival, will be lost. Yourself included. Your ships weapons... even the relays will be destroyed. Your worlds will be in ruin. Few organics will survive the blast. Fewer still wil survive the days to come."

This isn't just space faring species. This is everything within range of a relay's crucible blastwave. This is a possible total galactic extinction event. Worst than what the reapers are doing now. This isn't winning anything. This is them trying to talk your dumb ass out of it.

It's a plea for Refusal. Which is now the better ending of the two.


What you are saying is why not make an entire new ending completely seperate where shepard walks in, looks around, calls up Hackett, has EDI do scans and after a certain amount of time final decide to blow the thing suppressing the Crucible from arming. Then have the Star Child come out to plea for you to not do it with completely unique dialog. To basically make a completely new scene. All for some ending that less than 1% of the population would ever see because the only peole doing this are doing it on purpose to post of Youtube or for lawlz. Umm, no. I'd sure as well wouldn't waste extra time devising a whole new screenplay for this. 

Modifié par The Twilight God, 31 juillet 2012 - 05:04 .


#183
Lord Goose

Lord Goose
  • Members
  • 865 messages

This is them trying to talk your dumb ass out of it.


Why not say the same thing all the time, if they are lying? Why even tie this to amount of EMS?

#184
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

Lord Goose wrote...


That is the thing I call the Crucible Supression device (CSD). The thing you blow up to allow the Crucible to do what it was meant to do and would have done automatically if not for the Reaper's contraptions.


I understand your idea, but it's just interpretation of the game events. The fact is that Shepard shoots down the tube to activate Crucible, but it is not explained why. It is also not explained how he even gets that idea, unless you assume that he is suddenly expert in Crucible.


It's not interpretation.

Compare the endings. It is blatantly there right before your eyes. Blow it up, synthesis beam goes bye bye, crucible arms without any direct interaction with Shepard. What more is there to it?

It's like arguing that if there is a padlock on a door that I can't open and I shoot off the lock and the door opens, it wasn't the lock keeping it shut.  Or that without th elock it would still be unopenable. Or something absurd as saying the lock is the handle and part of the door itself....

#185
Leonardo the Magnificent

Leonardo the Magnificent
  • Members
  • 1 920 messages

The Twilight God wrote...

Leonardo the Magnificent wrote...

zambot wrote...

This is exactly why it is a good thing to finish the game with a low EMS and destroy the reaper base in ME2. If you actually accomplish very little, the StarKid only gives you the option to win the game.

Wait, what?


This ^


Win the game??? LOL Image IPBImage IPBImage IPBImage IPBImage IPB

"Your Crucible device is severely damaged. The energy it releases will destroy the relays, creating a chain reaction that will be unpredictable and devastating. Al technology and those that depend on synthetic technology for their survival, will be lost. Yourself included. Your ships weapons... even the relays will be destroyed. Your worlds will be in ruin. Few organics will survive the blast. Fewer still wil survive the days to come."

This isn't just space faring species. This is everything within range of a relay's crucible blastwave. This is a possible total galactic extinction event. Worst than what the reapers are doing now. This isn't winning anything. This is them trying to talk your dumb ass out of it.

It's a plea for Refusal. Which is now the better ending of the two.


What you are saying is why not make an entire new ending completely seperate where shepard walks in, looks around, calls up Hackett, has EDI do scans and after a certain amount of time final decide to blow the thing suppressing the Crucible from arming. Then have the Star Child come out to plea for you to not do it with completely unique dialog. To basically make a completely new scene. All for some ending that less than 1% of the population would ever see because the only peole doing this are doing it on purpose to post of Youtube or for lawlz. Umm, no. I'd sure as well wouldn't waste extra time devising a whole new screenplay for this. 




Then why does the Catalyst even drag you up there? If there's only one option that goes directly against his goals, as you say, then why give Shepard the chance to choose it?

Modifié par Leonardo the Magnificent, 31 juillet 2012 - 05:15 .


#186
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 277 messages

Lord Goose wrote...

This is them trying to talk your dumb ass out of it.


Why not say the same thing all the time, if they are lying? Why even tie this to amount of EMS?


Agreed, and the breath scene is still higher, than Synthesis. Which is funny because I thought Synthesis was the Best ending we get, or was the Breath scene the best ending for Destroy/the best ending?

Modifié par masster blaster, 31 juillet 2012 - 05:15 .


#187
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 182 messages

The Twilight God wrote...
Just moments earlier, Shepard argued with The Illusive Man against this very course of action. His exact words were, “You're playing with things you don't understand. With power you shouldn't be able to use” and Shepard can question TIM asking, “Are you willing to bet humanity's existence on it?”

Just saying, *your* Shepard might have said that. My Shepard didn't because I used the Renegade option. Using the Renegade option, Shepard instead challenges TIM to do it and end this once and for all, but of course TIM can't because the Reapers won't let him. 

It is perfectly possible to play a Shepard who ends up choosing Control, totally in-character and without indoctrination.

Synthesis has no precedent in the known history of the ME universe. That's part of the problem, but the Saren association doesn't work. The reality of Saren's vision would have looked somewhat like the Zha'til, very unlike both the description and the reality of Synthesis.

And besides, just because antagonists have those ideas doesn't mean they don't have merit. The merits and flaws of an idea are independent from the people who represent it.

#188
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

Lord Goose wrote...


This is them trying to talk your dumb ass out of it.


Why not say the same thing all the time, if they are lying? Why even tie this to amount of EMS?


Because it's not sweet talking you into control or synthesis. It doesn't need to seem neutral, impartial or without self-interest.
 
If the reapers told me that destroy was that horrible and then went on to say how wonderful synthesis and control were you would probably assume they were lying right off the bat to get me to not pick destroy. Notice the inhanced super imposed voice compared to others? I interpret that as a more intense push to force-indoctrinate Shep out of it. It's talking you out of something even it thinks is atrocious. Imagine that.

It problem however is that it is the reapers and why would Shepard believe it even if destroy is the only option. One might say it has more reason to lie about it from shepard's perspective. So it's up a ****s creek at that point. Indoctrinate shep or possible usher total galactic extinction.

#189
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

Leonardo the Magnificent wrote...

The Twilight God wrote...

Leonardo the Magnificent wrote...

zambot wrote...

This is exactly why it is a good thing to finish the game with a low EMS and destroy the reaper base in ME2. If you actually accomplish very little, the StarKid only gives you the option to win the game.

Wait, what?


This ^


Win the game??? LOL Image IPBImage IPBImage IPBImage IPBImage IPB

"Your Crucible device is severely damaged. The energy it releases will destroy the relays, creating a chain reaction that will be unpredictable and devastating. Al technology and those that depend on synthetic technology for their survival, will be lost. Yourself included. Your ships weapons... even the relays will be destroyed. Your worlds will be in ruin. Few organics will survive the blast. Fewer still wil survive the days to come."

This isn't just space faring species. This is everything within range of a relay's crucible blastwave. This is a possible total galactic extinction event. Worst than what the reapers are doing now. This isn't winning anything. This is them trying to talk your dumb ass out of it.

It's a plea for Refusal. Which is now the better ending of the two.


What you are saying is why not make an entire new ending completely seperate where shepard walks in, looks around, calls up Hackett, has EDI do scans and after a certain amount of time final decide to blow the thing suppressing the Crucible from arming. Then have the Star Child come out to plea for you to not do it with completely unique dialog. To basically make a completely new scene. All for some ending that less than 1% of the population would ever see because the only peole doing this are doing it on purpose to post of Youtube or for lawlz. Umm, no. I'd sure as well wouldn't waste extra time devising a whole new screenplay for this. 




Then why does the Catalyst even drag you up there? If there's only one option that goes directly against his goals, as you say, then why give Shepard the chance to choose it?


It doesn't drag him up there. Seems he hit the right button before he collapsed. It angrily asks him, "what are you doing here?"

#190
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Just saying, *your* Shepard might have said that. My Shepard didn't because I used the Renegade option. Using the Renegade option, Shepard instead challenges TIM to do it and end this once and for all, but of course TIM can't because the Reapers won't let him.


Shepard issues that challenge because he knows TIM can't. It's entire purpose is to make TIM realize that he's not in control. Not as an endorsement of The Illusive Reaper King. And you know this. Or is your Shepard so stupid (or indoctrinated) as to trust TIM with freakin reaper crap all over his face? Come on now.

Ieldra2 wrote...

It is perfectly possible to play a Shepard who ends up choosing Control, totally in-character and without indoctrination.


No it isn't. And you can't come up with a single reason to trust the reapers. Not one. And you know it.

Ieldra2 wrote...

Synthesis has no precedent in the known history of the ME universe. That's part of the problem, but the Saren association doesn't work. The reality of Saren's vision would have looked somewhat like the Zha'til, very unlike both the description and the reality of Synthesis.


Saren's vision would have looked like Soveriegn's. (i.e. the Reapers)



What is all comes down to is people don't like the implications that the evidence presents. You want your Control and Synthesis endings to have really played out that way. You want an ending with no sacrifice and all cupcakes and butterflies. Fine. I get that. Believe whatever you need to. That's why the endings are how they are. So you can continue believing whatever makes you happy.

Modifié par The Twilight God, 31 juillet 2012 - 05:40 .


#191
zambot

zambot
  • Members
  • 1 236 messages

The Twilight God wrote...

Leonardo the Magnificent wrote...

The Twilight God wrote...

Leonardo the Magnificent wrote...

zambot wrote...

This is exactly why it is a good thing to finish the game with a low EMS and destroy the reaper base in ME2. If you actually accomplish very little, the StarKid only gives you the option to win the game.

Wait, what?


This ^


Win the game??? LOL Image IPBImage IPBImage IPBImage IPBImage IPB

"Your Crucible device is severely damaged. The energy it releases will destroy the relays, creating a chain reaction that will be unpredictable and devastating. Al technology and those that depend on synthetic technology for their survival, will be lost. Yourself included. Your ships weapons... even the relays will be destroyed. Your worlds will be in ruin. Few organics will survive the blast. Fewer still wil survive the days to come."

This isn't just space faring species. This is everything within range of a relay's crucible blastwave. This is a possible total galactic extinction event. Worst than what the reapers are doing now. This isn't winning anything. This is them trying to talk your dumb ass out of it.

It's a plea for Refusal. Which is now the better ending of the two.


What you are saying is why not make an entire new ending completely seperate where shepard walks in, looks around, calls up Hackett, has EDI do scans and after a certain amount of time final decide to blow the thing suppressing the Crucible from arming. Then have the Star Child come out to plea for you to not do it with completely unique dialog. To basically make a completely new scene. All for some ending that less than 1% of the population would ever see because the only peole doing this are doing it on purpose to post of Youtube or for lawlz. Umm, no. I'd sure as well wouldn't waste extra time devising a whole new screenplay for this. 




Then why does the Catalyst even drag you up there? If there's only one option that goes directly against his goals, as you say, then why give Shepard the chance to choose it?


It doesn't drag him up there. Seems he hit the right button before he collapsed. It angrily asks him, "what are you doing here?"


This is one of the bigger weaknesses in your interpretation, and indeed with most ITs.  They seem pretty well thought out when you look at all the choices together, but tend to break down when presented with the lesser EMS options.  As I see it above, the defense you have presented for low EMS destroy in the context of indoctrination are:

a. Refusal is better
b. Reapers suddenly become good guys and try to talk you out of it
c. Bioware (despite intricately placing IT clues throughout the story decided it wasn't worth spending time on this option.

If that works for you, great.  That's not terribly convincing to me.

Modifié par zambot, 31 juillet 2012 - 06:11 .


#192
zambot

zambot
  • Members
  • 1 236 messages

The Twilight God wrote...

What is all comes down to is people don't like the implications that the evidence presents. You want your Control and Synthesis endings to have really played out that way. You want an ending with no sacrifice and all cupcakes and butterflies. Fine. I get that. Believe whatever you need to. That's why the endings are how they are. So you can continue believing whatever makes you happy.


While I think synthesis is silly space magic, I do believe I've grasped the writers' intent, and I don't think you do.  Synthesis does end with a sacrifice: the life of Shepard.  Shepard (the great unifier of the galaxy if you're a paragon) finally has the chance to complete the ultimate act of unification, by brokering peace between the reapers and everyone else.  In order to do that (s)he has to sacrifice him/herself completely.  

Silly in execution?  Yes.  But it is thematically consistent with what Shepard has been doing all along.  

Modifié par zambot, 31 juillet 2012 - 06:10 .


#193
Grogimus

Grogimus
  • Members
  • 145 messages

The Twilight God wrote... 
Note that the Reapers chose to present themselves in the form of the child Shepard encounters for a few brief moments on Earth. A child that no other person sees or interacts with. A child that, for some unknown reason, haunts Shepard's dreams instead of others he has lost who were actually close to him. Dreams full of whispers and oily shadows.  The very fact that this Catalyst is appearing in this form demonstrates that it is in Shepard's head. I doubt there was even an AI on the Citadel. It was just Harbinger or a collective of reapers speaking to Shepard via hallucination like Harbinger does at the end of the Arrival DLC.  The final battle is against indoctrination. It is a battle of will and conviction.  Some of us won. Some of you lost.


Well done sir!  You articulated most of my own thoughts and expounded on others.  This last paragraph especially sums up what I think happened.  Most players really don't like the idea they may have been tricked(indoctrinated) themselves.  As you said, whether intended or not, it's a brilliant ending.

#194
Cheviot

Cheviot
  • Members
  • 1 484 messages

The Twilight God wrote...

Leonardo the Magnificent wrote...

Then why does the Catalyst even drag you up there? If there's only one option that goes directly against his goals, as you say, then why give Shepard the chance to choose it?


It doesn't drag him up there. Seems he hit the right button before he collapsed. It angrily asks him, "what are you doing here?"


He didn't hit any buttons before his collapse.

#195
Thaa_solon

Thaa_solon
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages
I am the indoctrination process

#196
Cheviot

Cheviot
  • Members
  • 1 484 messages

The Twilight God wrote...

Cheviot wrote...

There's no in-game evidence of this.  In fact, if you have a low enough EMS and destroyed the Collector Base then Destroy is the only "choice" given.  Where's your "suppression device" then?


You still have to blow it up...


Cheviot wrote...
Fair enough, but even considering that point, what's the sense in
creating a "suppression device" that you want to protect from
destruction but then direct Shepard to destroy it with no other options
(with low EMS)?  Also, why let Shepard into the same area as it in the
first place if you want to protect it as badly as the OP thinks the
Catalyst does?



#197
Wayning_Star

Wayning_Star
  • Members
  • 8 016 messages

The Twilight God wrote...

Wayning_Star wrote...

their actions may be construed as evil, but they are not, as simple machines, they lack the sapience to construct a right from wrong programming protocol. If they did, they'd give up on the cycle independently, without extra user interfacing... Even lowly geth Legion could tell right from wrong when he defende that geth in the fields from it's quarian master creator... Cannot fit that into the IT very easily..or at all.


Rather they are simple machines is up for debate. You obviously believe whatever the StarChild tells you. Obviously, I don't. I think his whole story was a lie. It think it was just Harbinger trying to taslk his way out of destruction.

Here's something else Legion says about the Reapers: Dumb machines?


ok, I'll bite, only because I'm a hopeless sci fi nut without a normal syntho-organic construct to tell me not to..lol

I remembered that conversation with Legion. I got the impression that Legion was only trying to describe his version of what the Geth percieved the Reaper mentality was, from his presective. Just like he would try and describe his creators, with typical 'geth' identity issues.(like when he couldn't 'find' the reason he wore a chunk of hero worship/fanboy memoribilia...didn't computer ;)

That being said, the description of the reaper core logic center consisting of massive organic "minds" wrought from harvest. I still hold that the reapers are 'advanced' in the sense that they've absorbed mucho data from all those mindes, reflected as 'a nation', because that's the best organic reference for it (community=geth collective) But the inability of those "organic" minds(data only) to feel emotion, there is no reference to emotions,as these require the proper assembly of relevant parts of the whole, to get the necessary impulses that generate given emotion. So,eventhough partly organic, the reaper physiology omits these,and their 'instant' evolution cuts clean that learning processes necessary to taylor such survival instincts implementing the "organic condition". Reapers only use the minds as data centers, not existing as a given organic race. Their programming insist that they harvest to protect organic life, not live among them as a 'nation' of , say people. The reference is only a catalog entry to them, it's what makes them so friggen alien. More like insane, but as machines that isn't possible.

Shepard, just a rowdy grunt on a mission from who knows, sees that this concept is not 'organic', but machinelike and without our individuality, we'd be 'just like machines'. I head canon that this is the flaw in the Reaper mind, as they are organic only in that their construction is wrought from organic downloaded knowledge only, but purely synthetic in function. They are programmed, they think like a machine with gobs of organic data(DNA included,but not pertainant here). There are no hopes dreams imagination that produces intuition. Programmed reapers cannot dream, guess,have a hunch, feel good about stuff or even take a healthy ******.. poor things. The only thing going "for" them is that they're way too powerful, and with the blocking of emotion from their collected organic "minds" leaves them just mechanicals with synthetic-organic identity issues.

Now on that IT issue, I figured out why the idea of it is so attractive..heheh.. it kind of meshes with my theory that the entire fiasco facing the MEU is underpinned by the suspicion that something is amiss with the communication and understandings between Shepard and the Reapers. It all lies in the face of the fact that Shep cannot be in two places at once, and isn't capable of the things he gets away with in the MEU, unassisted. That is, hes is either "with us or against us". What the IT folks miss, is that he isn't the only ones fighting the reapers, besides the "known" MEU folks.
Leads them to believe that the whole thing is just a ruse to get everyone 'salvaged', er..harvested.

Here is a question I asked myself, don't know if it's just a hunch, or massively superior intuition.

Who else would want the reapers 'out of the picture' besides Shepard and all related to him?

People or Machines, that could possible be powerful enough to assist him without being seen, able to utilize advanced reaper technology,communicate with Shepard, via indoctrination or stronger communication techniques,(like in dreams,etc) ?

Hidden in a place that's inaccessable, yet able to reach out and touch some one at any time, even permit miricles of resurrection, Bringing Shepard back to life, something not listed in ANY codex that I could find...(whoa!!)

Could give the folks of the MEU the ability, knowledge, skil set to find, assemble, program and power up a tool, appealing to lesser races as a weapon, the crucible, and desperate enough to even turn them loose with it, having to absolutely KNOW they're incapable of understanding or properly utilizing it for its intended purpose?

These entities are listed in the codex and are an integral part of the ME society, probably one of the most powerful and potent 'shapers' of the entire Mass Effect Universe..but.. we never actually get to see them.. in person, so we don't "get" to know them, or much about them..we only know that they were harvested a long time ago.

Just say'nImage IPB

Modifié par Wayning_Star, 31 juillet 2012 - 07:23 .


#198
yogibbear87

yogibbear87
  • Members
  • 27 messages

RadicalDisconnect wrote...

Without metagaming, you really have no reason to trust the Catalyst, and certainly have no reason to choose control or synthesis. But I suppose this is for another topic.

zambot wrote...

This is exactly why it is a good thing to finish the game with a low EMS and destroy the reaper base in ME2. If you actually accomplish very little, the StarKid only gives you the option to win the game.

Wait, what?


Yeah, this is what really baffled me about IT after metagaming. Considering that the Catalyst can turn off the Crucible if he deems that you are unwilling to make a choice, I really don't know what the Catalyst's motive is. It just doesn't make much sense. IT doesn't quite explain it, but taking it face value also seems rather ridiculous.


Because if you got to the end with low EMS you didn't spend an extra 10 hrs collecting all those war assets giving the reapers plenty of extra time to get their indoctrination working. So when you confront the catalyst he knows his words won't ring true with you and you're just left with destroy. All those dreams throughout the game are indoctrination attempts. It takes time. The less time you took to get to the end the better for you. However, because you got there quick and missed out on war assets it is NOT good for Earth. Shepard is meant to sacrifice herself (himself) for the greater good of the galaxy.

Also, if you get to the end with low EMS BUT you completed arrival DLC for ME2 and kept the Collector Base, you are not left with Destroy, but with Control. So Earth is screwed. And you are indoctrinated (due to exposure to reaper tech in Arrival DLC).

Modifié par yogibbear87, 31 juillet 2012 - 07:39 .


#199
Wayning_Star

Wayning_Star
  • Members
  • 8 016 messages

yogibbear87 wrote...

RadicalDisconnect wrote...

Without metagaming, you really have no reason to trust the Catalyst, and certainly have no reason to choose control or synthesis. But I suppose this is for another topic.

zambot wrote...

This is exactly why it is a good thing to finish the game with a low EMS and destroy the reaper base in ME2. If you actually accomplish very little, the StarKid only gives you the option to win the game.

Wait, what?


Yeah, this is what really baffled me about IT after metagaming. Considering that the Catalyst can turn off the Crucible if he deems that you are unwilling to make a choice, I really don't know what the Catalyst's motive is. It just doesn't make much sense. IT doesn't quite explain it, but taking it face value also seems rather ridiculous.


Because if you got to the end with low EMS you didn't spend an extra 10 hrs collecting all those war assets giving the reapers plenty of extra time to get their indoctrination working. So when you confront the catalyst he knows his words won't ring true with you and you're just left with destroy. All those dreams throughout the game are indoctrination attempts. It takes time. The less time you took to get to the end the better for you. However, because you got there quick and missed out on war assets it is NOT good for Earth. Shepard is meant to sacrifice herself (himself) for the greater good of the galaxy.

Also, if you get to the end with low EMS BUT you completed arrival DLC for ME2 and kept the Collector Base, you are not left with Destroy, but with Control. So Earth is screwed. And you are indoctrinated (due to exposure to reaper tech in Arrival DLC).



why resurrect Shepard just to later fully indoctrinate him, why not just clone him and have full control. Shep could just glide through and hug up to the catalyst and everyone goes home to a friendly game of cycle the organics?

edit: the Illusive man is fully indoctrinated and is the one behind bringing Shepard back to fight non other than the reapers/catalyst head reaper.

Modifié par Wayning_Star, 31 juillet 2012 - 07:47 .


#200
ShepnTali

ShepnTali
  • Members
  • 4 535 messages
Does this speculation include the notion of mandatory 'true' ending DLC on the way, or that is what the ending is and that's that?