Destoryes are a threat and oculus can dive into our ships and blow them up from the inside out. They are not junk.BerzerkGene wrote...
I don't regard destroyers as a credible threat, so to me they're all dreaddies. Even if they have ten times that number, if its 140 of 295, its still vastly underwhelming. oculi are junk, i regard those even less of a threat.iamweaver wrote...
First - that's a shot of part of the Reaper fleet. We don't know anything about its makeup, or what percentage of the fleet it represents. There's no scale there - we don't know if any of those streaks or images are even Sovereign-class ships. All it does is place a lower bound on the Reaper fleet size. Lower, not upper. And it's just an art image.BerzerkGene wrote...
Kay, thats a couple thousand(of thats what i feel this shows), not a million billion, not even a hundred thousand. Someone counted those, there are meant to be around 140 Reapers shown. Not impressed. Especially by the numbers. The reapers would need a minimum of 200,000 to actually outnumber the galaxy. that would imply that Harbinger is around 10billion years old.dreman9999 wrote...
Yes, they do.Conniving_Eagle wrote...
Reapers don't have the advantage of numbers...
Second - are you really just counting the number of armed spacefaring platforms and saying, "all equal"? I can't even begin to imagine what kind of logic you're using for that. An oculus <> a Sovereign class ship. A quarian civilian vessel <> a Turian dreadnaught. You can't even average them (and how woud you?)
Third, no one knows how many of each class ship anyone has, from either side, other than a count of dreadnoughts. We just don't. Anything else is a number that someone has pulled out of thin air, or by making bogus comparisons to 21st C data, which has no relevence. Even in the last 150 years, the number of capital ships vs smaller ships has varied dramatically from decade to decade. Going back much farther than that, the comparison vanishes, because there's no such thing as a ship class - and why are we comparing water-based naval vessals with spaceships, anyway? The only thing we could do, if someone cared, would be to count the number of dots in the shot of the galactic fleet as it appeared over Earth, and use that minus 127 as the minimum number of cruisers, frigates and fighters. Completely unhelpful.
I'm counting any ship. The Quarian flotilla on its own is 50k ships. The Geth probably have a similar number, being able to match them and all. Considering the Quarians arm the entire fleet, including the civilian ships, yes i count those.
Well we know dreadnough numbers, approximately, the geth and quarians boost the number considerably.
I'm making no comparisons to current military numbers. The numbers i get from are in the game. Some things have to be implied when you get things like "Cruiser-weight starships are the standard combat unit encountered away from large naval bases, the "poor bloody infantry" of most fleets" This basically means that these would be the most common, but dreadnoughts are so rare they're actually numbered.
Comparing numbers in cutscenes is a bad idea, i mean it makes it seem like theres only a few dozen reapers around earth when its meant to be the bulk of the fleet. Plus theres the whole half of your space assets never showing up. Its why i find that scene cool but totally lacking. The galactic fleet as it ftls in is much more than 127 though.
The geth have a limit to how much they can make, the reaper don't vis ahusk forces.
The quarian ship mostly havedated ships and lack defencive power.





Retour en haut





