TS2Aggie wrote...
Actually, no, you don't.
One can hate the quarians for their actions in the past and their actions in the present. Very, very few quarians are presented as actually accepting the idea that what their ancestors had done to the geth was wrong (in fact, only one comes outright and says that. Only one). Very few quarians present themselves as anything but "victims" of the geth uprising, when they, in fact, were the instigators and aggressors of the conflict in the first place. Very few quarians have been shown to be at least open to the idea of at least trying to genuinely broker peace with the geth.
When a race chooses to put a warmongerer like Han'Gerrel in a position where he alone can dictate what the fleet's actions are, they are responsible for everything he does (this is why I feel no remorse over letting the quarians die in games where I cannot make peace). Shala'Raan says that she *should* charge Han'Gerrel with treason...but she doesn't. Remember, there were five admirals voting on the geth war: Han and Xen voted for it, Tali and Zaal'Koris voted against it. The only way that the war would have gotten pushed through was if Shala voted for it.
The quarians are reaping what they've sown, and I can't feel sorry for a race that tries to paint itself as a victim in a war they started and chose to continue.
This is my last post (getting way off topic)
Point #1, you could say the same about humanity and the nice things we have done to others... Native Americans, and how we drove them out of thier homes, giving them blankets infected with smallpox, just so we could take over. I guess we should just blame humanity as a whole, even though we were not alive nor responsible for it.
My point is that you assume all Quarians are all like "ZOMG KILL ALL GETH!!1!!1!!!11!!" and try to generalize the entire populus based on a few military leaders. And that type of thinking is very immature and narrow-minded.
I guess you must hate
all Germans because of WW2, I mean, they
all went along with it. right? <_<
inb4 "Oh noes! godwin's law!"
Point #2, So you feel no remorse for all the thousands of children, and millions of civilians that will die just because you disagree with some leaders? Lack of action is still an action. And you just sitting by while the, oh sooo innocent Geth, go on wipping them out; is a lack of action that ends with millions of innocence dead, when you could have stopped it. Nice "paragon" choice ya got thar.
Raan didn't charge him with treason because they are in the middle of taking back Rannoch, who's to say they wouldn't after the war? You think they just forgot about it?
Point #3, Reaping what they've sown eh? Again, you could say the same for the Geth, Asari, or anyone for that matter, the only difference is that you are choosing to use it as a reason to hate Quarians as a whole. And it is very debatable whether or not what the Quarian's did in the mourning war was right or wrong.
DirtySHISN0 wrote...
This amused us.
Hate is a feeling, an emotion. Emotions are subjective. Qualifying factors for an opinion are subjective.
I can't believe that you are actually trying to argue that opinions must be logical.
Your trying to act like a Geth? Seriously? Cause nobody else has ever done that before <_<
I am not trying to argue that opinions must be logical. I was only showing TS2Aggie how flawed her view is. Judging a race as a whole because thier leaders made a choice is indeed flawed, emotion has nothing to do with it.
Retour en haut
(((((
