Ok, I'm a physicist, so let's talk some physics.
First:
In real quantum entanglement the pairs have to be entangled at creation of the pair of particles (eg they are now described as a super position of possible quantum states that are constrained by some conservation law to have corresponding values when the quantum state is measured). These entangled pairs then have to be transmitted some distance, and then measured.
Second:
After these pairs are measured they are no longer entangled. Measuring a entangled pair of particles removes their correlation between states.
Third:
The correlation between states of entangled pairs is only evident after you have measured the states of objects, and compared the data to the other experiment that measured the states of these objects. You then see that Bell's Inequality is exactly followed. In principle, you cannot use them to communicate FTL because the correlation between states is only evident when comparing ensembles of the two experiments. This comparison necessarily requires coventional communication.
Fourth:
There is such a thing as a quantum singlet, doublet, triplet, etc. The image most people have in their mind of a entangled state is one of a spin singlet quantum state. There is no net spin, so at the end of the day the entangled particles must be measured in opposite spin states if there is conservation of angular momentum.
Fifth:
Based on the real physics each QEC can only transmit as many bits as it has entangled pairs, entangled pairs are destroyed when they are measured, so even if we ignore that we can't transmit information faster than the speed of light in a meaningful way with quantum entanglement, we still have the problem that a QEC has to be hard wired to another QEC and can only be used a finite amount of times and would also have a limited amount of total data that could be sent in the lifetime of the two entangled QECs.
From this point on I am going to ignore the actual physics and assume that QEC's work, but keep some of the basic physical principles of real quantum entanglement, but somehow kill relativity and you're able to somehow re-entangle particles after they've been measured to 'transmit' information.
Six:
Even if we ignore most of the previous points, the quantum states are fragile. An errant photon (electron) and your entangled electron (photon) is no longer entangled. That means interference can happen if there is enough outside particle flux near a QEC such that a lot of the transmitted data is, essentially, random measurement that wasn't part of your QEC's design specs and thus cannot be used as useful signal.
Seventh:
Interference in quantum mechanics comes down entirely to relative phase between two quantum states (true interference, of the wave kind, not of your signal degrading because your quantum states were collapsed by an outside source). If you sent a beam of particles in similar states as the QEC uses, but with a different phase, you could (in principle) selectively interfere with the QEC on the quantum mechanical level.
Modifié par inko1nsiderate, 02 août 2012 - 12:09 .