Modifié par Ticonderoga117, 02 août 2012 - 02:32 .
AstusOz wrote...
Now I'm going to imagine an unfitting dubbing over him every time he shows up.WindfishDude wrote...
He reminded me of Wimp Lo from Kung Pow -Enter the Fist, and that makes him all the more hilarious.
Thanks.
Firstly, I have read the books. I know it's sexist, and I apologize, but at one point he kills an unconscious woman just because he can. That's one of those moral event horizon thingies, and I just wanted to see him dead afterwards. But no, he magically survives the encounter with Anderson, goes on to kill another major character from the books (the autistic biotics experiment, with a toothbrush).So why does everyone hate him?
chuckles471 wrote...
AstusOz wrote...
Now I'm going to imagine an unfitting dubbing over him every time he shows up.WindfishDude wrote...
He reminded me of Wimp Lo from Kung Pow -Enter the Fist, and that makes him all the more hilarious.
Thanks.
"Face to mass effected chunk of metal style. How'd you like that."
"I'm bleeding making me the victor"
Modifié par BDelacroix, 02 août 2012 - 02:43 .
RShara wrote...
Because every time he appears, Shepard and his/her squad does this:
:lol::lol:
tholloway93 wrote...
hes hard to know unless you've read the books; at one point anderson points out that he shot kai leng in both legs so cerberus must have implanted him like they did grayson; - you will know none of this or who grayson even is / was unless you read the books.
v TricKy v wrote...
RShara wrote...
Because every time he appears, Shepard and his/her squad does this:
This pic is pure gold
This is more or less what I think of him as well. In Retribution, he was quite intimidating and reflected such a powerful image for an antagonist. In subsequent media, i.e. Deception and ME3, he simply doesn't match. Frankly, it's like he's an attention hoo.HagarIshay wrote...
My problem with the guy is that he isn't more than a simple antagonist that was added just to make Shepard's life difficult. Him giving us only reasons to hate him is not something good about him. There is no way to symphesise with his character, he seem to stand for nothing, there is nothing about him. He's nothing more than a puppet for TIM, not a great character here. Even with reading the books, I don't find him an interesting character at all in the game. And that's sad, he was pretty cool in the books.
Modifié par Fiery Phoenix, 02 août 2012 - 02:48 .
Wayning_Star wrote...
v TricKy v wrote...
RShara wrote...
Because every time he appears, Shepard and his/her squad does this:
This pic is pure gold
they picked the refuse ending?
it seems so, there was no need at all for anderson to mention grayson for example. The books do seem to fill in a lot of holes that they shouldnt really have to; like what kai leng was doing during ME1 / 2.Wayning_Star wrote...
tholloway93 wrote...
hes hard to know unless you've read the books; at one point anderson points out that he shot kai leng in both legs so cerberus must have implanted him like they did grayson; - you will know none of this or who grayson even is / was unless you read the books.
is it just me or are 'the books' interfering with the 'the game' subject matter? They don't seem to be coinciding too well?
(kind of an ESP codexy plot confuser? if we don't read the books then we cannot read their minds...and place out of game stuff in the game so as to understand it better.)
Greylycantrope wrote...
I honestly thought we'd get that achievement for blowing up Harbinger, I saw it unlock when I beat Leng and thought it was a glitch.
Modifié par The Angry One, 02 août 2012 - 03:01 .
tholloway93 wrote...
it seems so, there was no need at all for anderson to mention grayson for example. The books do seem to fill in a lot of holes that they shouldnt really have to; like what kai leng was doing during ME1 / 2.Wayning_Star wrote...
tholloway93 wrote...
hes hard to know unless you've read the books; at one point anderson points out that he shot kai leng in both legs so cerberus must have implanted him like they did grayson; - you will know none of this or who grayson even is / was unless you read the books.
is it just me or are 'the books' interfering with the 'the game' subject matter? They don't seem to be coinciding too well?
(kind of an ESP codexy plot confuser? if we don't read the books then we cannot read their minds...and place out of game stuff in the game so as to understand it better.)
im currently playing through ME3 as a completely new game with a femshep, using the mindset that ive never played the other games and at many points im thinking 'this game makes NO sense unless you've played ME1+2' lol, as a standalone game theres too much going on unless you know.
Modifié par Wayning_Star, 02 août 2012 - 03:04 .
D24O wrote...
I don't know what everyone's talking about, I thought he was a great villain, very believable. Especially with the buildup from deception.
The Angry One wrote...
Greylycantrope wrote...
I honestly thought we'd get that achievement for blowing up Harbinger, I saw it unlock when I beat Leng and thought it was a glitch.
I regard the hamster on the Normandy as more of an "old adversary" than Kai Leng. At least it's good at hiding.
I mean seriously "LOL I trolled you once now we're rivals." No Kai Leng, you are nothing. You are less than nothing. Nothing is reserved for characters 5 times as well written as you. Had you not lead to Thane's death I wouldn't even remember who you are!
Terminus Echoes wrote...
He kills the Salarian Councilor/Thane/Kirrahe, steals Vendetta on Thessia, sends you a taunting email, and attacks Miranda.
So why does everyone hate him?
Genetic Destiny wrote...
Terminus Echoes wrote...
He kills the Salarian Councilor/Thane/Kirrahe, steals Vendetta on Thessia, sends you a taunting email, and attacks Miranda.
So why does everyone hate him?
You answered your own question. He also runs away a lot, and thinks "That Shepard guy ain't so tough".
Retour en haut
