Dear Bioware: Rebuff the N7 Typhoon
#201
Posté 03 août 2012 - 08:20
#202
Posté 03 août 2012 - 08:47
#203
Posté 03 août 2012 - 08:50
#204
Posté 03 août 2012 - 08:55
#205
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:10
#206
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:18
Leisure Muffin wrote...
You can get the thread locked by just saying bump. At least try and pretend like you are saying something. Kinda like I am doing right now.
Well, OP said everything pretty much. That the gun's power comes at cost of your risk and vulnerability. You have to expose yourself for long time,to get results. And the gun comes only 1 and 3/4 backup magazines,which further endanger you by forcing you out of cover to refill ammo,which you have to do very often. This all must justify it's huge power, as well as UR status and difficulty to obtain.
#207
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:28
We are all in this fight togetherTerminus Echoes wrote...
Thanks for the bumps, guys. These forums are fast, and I put a lot of effort into this thread. I really appreciate it.
#208
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:35
#209
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:38
And any weapon that has a downside of having to expose yourself to fire for a long period of time should have an upside of being extremely effective.
Modifié par Bathaius, 03 août 2012 - 09:40 .
#210
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:46
/signed
#211
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:54
#212
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:56
mat_mark wrote...
Well said OP
/signed
Will this be treated as an official petition unless you put OFFICIAL PETITION in caps in the title ??
#213
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:56
I've heard some weird things about the gun on both ends of the spectrum of possibility. Gun shield protecting character from head shots (seems logical but I didn't even know we could be head-shotted), it apparently firing cartridge ammunition given the flying casings. reports of it being very accurate or very inaccurate. saw the insanity of it's pre-nerf penetration (seriously that had to go and we all knew it) and so forth.
Regardless of it's actual capability it seems that all rapid fire/automatic weapons in the game are lagging behind in damage and or dps. I think it says something when the the butt of a gun becomes more potent a weapon then the gun itself.
I still really want to get it.
#214
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:57
xis3 wrote...
Change are fine, before you guys could wreck havock in plat with your typhoon I and now you can't, wich is normal for a lvl I, go for lvl X and then we will see if it's still crap as you think.
You realize that probably less than 90% of the people that own/have owned ME3 have a Rank X UR weapon?
#215
Posté 03 août 2012 - 09:59
xis3 wrote...
Change are fine, before you guys could wreck havock in plat with your typhoon I and now you can't, wich is normal for a lvl I, go for lvl X and then we will see if it's still crap as you think.
I have a lvl X & can safely say that it is not worthy of it's UR status after the nerf & the damage reduction is noticeable in a big way in gold/platinum <_<
#216
Posté 03 août 2012 - 10:00
xis3 wrote...
Change are fine, before you guys could wreck havock in plat with your typhoon I and now you can't, wich is normal for a lvl I, go for lvl X and then we will see if it's still crap as you think.
To have a Typhoon X you need to spend tenth of millions of credits. Easier to say than actually do,it is not an uncommon weapon.
Yeah, and now a platinum with randoms is even more nightmarish than before,all you get from such games are spoilt nerves.
#217
Posté 03 août 2012 - 10:02
AbhijitSM wrote...
mat_mark wrote...
Well said OP
/signed
Will this be treated as an official petition unless you put OFFICIAL PETITION in caps in the title ??
Yeah,time to make it official.
#218
Posté 03 août 2012 - 10:03
AbhijitSM wrote...
mat_mark wrote...
Well said OP
/signed
Will this be treated as an official petition unless you put OFFICIAL PETITION in caps in the title ??
Should I?
#219
Posté 03 août 2012 - 10:06
Terminus Echoes wrote...
Should I?
Of course you should!
#220
Posté 03 août 2012 - 10:09
Lkv999 wrote...
Terminus Echoes wrote...
Should I?
Of course you should!
Done!
#221
Posté 03 août 2012 - 10:09
Terminus Echoes wrote...
AbhijitSM wrote...
mat_mark wrote...
Well said OP
/signed
Will this be treated as an official petition unless you put OFFICIAL PETITION in caps in the title ??
Should I?
I don't know the rules made by BW for this. But i have seen countless posts in other threads whre people have asked the OP to put "Official Petition" in caps in the title at the beginning to make it official.
#222
Posté 03 août 2012 - 10:13
It's not an official petition, adding "Official" makes it sound petty and whiny, as many do. Kindly remove it from the title to stop some of those with less tolerance to mistakes like that just ignoring the post.
as for the full topic, buff up the Typhoon again, weaken the Turian Soldier, N7 Destroyer and Geth Infiltrator classes. They make the playing field too diverse, meaning that weapons like the Typhoon are unjustly nerfed for the sake of a couple classes being amazing with them, while everyone else uses it to decent/below average effect. Look at sniper rifles prior to TC nerf, they were below average in terms of DPS on most classes, but since everyone used them with infiltrators, it seemed as though the snipers were really OP, when it was actually the classes massive damage output doing all the work.
Modifié par GroverA125, 03 août 2012 - 10:19 .
#223
Posté 03 août 2012 - 10:16
with the change, the power climbing from I to X is good.
Does every UR was that powerfull at I ?no, none.
#224
Posté 03 août 2012 - 10:17
#225
Posté 03 août 2012 - 10:19
make it the way it was. I just got the Krysae and it's terrible, I's rather use the Indra and that gun is awesome now.





Retour en haut





