sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
Wow. Just. Wow. Thread started somewhat reasonable and has now degenerated into :facepalm:
* I get it. Some people like the endings as they stand. Fine. Enjoy them.
* Some people don't like the endings, but I think that thing have gotten way out of hand here.
End the name calling. I'm tired of it. It's why we can't have nice things. While I'm not enamored with Starbrat and his spiel, we're stuck with it.
* I have no gripe with Control, Synthesis, or Refuse. Dead Shepards get closure. My gripe is with 6 fracking seconds in Destroy -- it's a cliffhanger -- this gets "speculations" and no closure except a head canon.
If it wasn't for this I'd be fine with it. I think we'd all pretty much be fine with it. It might not be the perfect ending we all wanted, but we could live with it.
Gamble said they're not going to "change" the ending. "Change" is in quotes in his tweet. Something is up. What Priestly is saying is that the team is not writing anything that is ending focused, and that they're committed to writing Leviathan right now and further DLC. This means that they are not going to "change" in quotes the ending. Again, something is up.
Maybe some speculations will be answered after all without "changing" the ending.
I want to see what is up. So I'll wait and view the forums after the DLC is released and if this is a "OMG you've got to play this! It does xxxxxxxx" That's one thing. That xxxxxxxx could make it worth getting.
We might be sharing a boat here. Those are the things that need to crop up in the forums for me to even consider buying this.
Still, I'm extremely worried that they try to foreshadow and justify the Catalyst somehow instead sidelining him as much as possible.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




