Gamemako wrote...
Sp3c7eR wrote...
All of your DPS calculations assume perfect acccuracy which is a logical fallacy.
Oh, wait, you're missing more with the Typhoon with the Rev? More than with the Piranha? More than the Hurricane? Oh, look, you aren't. The gun is more accurate than any of the competition.
I could respond to the rest of your nonsense, but I'd rather spend my time figuring out the actual mechanics instead of responding to your insane troll logic.
The Harrier is very accurate, and so is the Saber. And I don't have any trouble with the Rev X either. And last I checked, those were all ARs. And
The thing you need to realize is that Sp3cter's video shows best possible circumstances -- Typhoon vs Atlas, no enemies around. Try playing gold/platinum under usual circumanstances (Sp3cter's pre-video) and see how being exposed to enemy fire and offense skills (hello smoke screens and stunlocks) effect the *math.*
This game can't be boiled down to a simplistic equation. If you want to create a mathematical model, you'd have to factor in every single attack against you, your teammates, and even how the AI interacts with the team.
What most people are saying is that post-nerf the Typhoon is much less effective. On paper, anyone can argue that it's still great (see Eric's post). In the reality of the game, where so many other variables (via enemies and things such as stuns, smoke, DR movement, taking cover, grenades...) come into play, the math isn't just the result of a few numbers. Again, refer to the video and ask yourself: Is this gun nearly as good as it once was? And, how effective is it now, post-nerf, against all of the Big Bosses, not just a lumbering Atlas?
Modifié par PKTracer, 05 août 2012 - 08:40 .