171 réponses à ce sujet

[element eater]

aeonlifestream wrote...

RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...

aeonlifestream wrote...

I highly doubt they would add multiplayer to Dragon Age. When was the last medieval setting C-RPG that actually had co-op / multiplayer? I honestly can't remember, to be honest.

World of Warcraft.  A couple people play it.

That is an MMO, a totally different ballgame. I am talking about a single player focused RPG.

dark souls but you probably wouldnt iinclude that

[Fortlowe]

MP or no, I hope it'll be a really really great game. Hell, I completely underestimated how addictive ME3's MP would be, so I get given enough incentive and resources, it could work in DA, too. But main thing: breathtakingly good game Bioware. You can do it.

[Ghost]

Fortlowe wrote...

MP or no, I hope it'll be a really really great game. Hell, I completely underestimated how addictive ME3's MP would be, so I get given enough incentive and resources, it could work in DA, too. But main thing: breathtakingly good game Bioware. You can do it.

This.

[Halo Quea]

Fortlowe wrote...

MP or no, I hope it'll be a really really great game. Hell, I completely underestimated how addictive ME3's MP would be, so I get given enough incentive and resources, it could work in DA, too. But main thing: breathtakingly good game Bioware. You can do it.

The multiplayer depsite all of the tech issues, nerfdom and repetitive enemy factions was enjoyable, but it came at the expense of the single player campaign.   Short, ridiculously contrived plots and subplots, limited squad, limited campaign/customization options, exploration reduced to an inferior mini-game................and that's BEFORE we even got to the endings.

This is what primarly concerns most of the people here who actually still intend to buy DA3.  Multiplayers are being tacked on everything now, even on titles that didn't previously need them.  Some will be good MPs, but most unfortunately are very cheap.

The problem IS, the better the multiplayer, the worse the single campaign is likely to be.

[PinkShoes]

I dont want it, a olot of people dont seem to want it but if its gunna happen its gunna happen. Lets just all hope it doesnt take away from the SP expierence.

Honestly i think it would be the wrong time to bring it out because DA2 was bad and if DA3 is bad or even if say some aspect of it was bad and the rest good people will blame the MP. they will think ut was because they spent the time they could have on the SP on the MP.

[Androme]

 Co-op that doesn't take tons of resources away from the single player experience is the ONLY form of multiplayer I would be happy with. Other than that, 100% single player.

[Androme]

Yeah, same here sjpelkessjpeler, no MP is preferable, but if BioWare insists on MP then I stand by my above post

[Ulathar]

I think it would depend on how the game is designed. If the gameplay leans more toward DA:O or a game like Neverwinter Nights 2, then I think MP could be a great addition to the game, especially in the long run. With a certain kind of MP, there'd be lots of options to do RP in the world of DA. At that point, a mod-kit would also come in handy. But as I said, it would depend on how the game is designed.

All IMO, of course.

[Shanook]

I dunno. I would love to see multiplayer in DA--I for one think Fable-style henchmen would be fun--but I think putting it in DA3 is a bad idea. Seems to me the general consensus is that no one wants multiplayer, and everyone is still p****d about DA2. Just seems like it'll enrage fans that are already enraged. And we all know that if any part of the single player falls flat it will immediately be blamed on the multiplayer, just like with ME3.

So basically, I wouldn't complain about multiplayer, but where most of the fans are concerned it seems like a bad idea at the moment. Probably better to hold off until at least DA4.

[Giga Drill BREAKER]

Yep shoehorn in some MP to take resources and disc space away from SP, also they better add micro-transactions to maximise profits.

[Fortlowe]

^That is almost exactly what shouldn't happen. Two discs is fine with me.

[Giga Drill BREAKER]

But it is exactly what will happen, look at ME3.

[Shanook]

DinoSteve wrote...

But it is exactly what will happen, look at ME3.

360 version of ME3 did have two discs.

[Giga Drill BREAKER]

Shanook wrote...

DinoSteve wrote...

But it is exactly what will happen, look at ME3.

360 version of ME3 did have two discs.

I meant this is what will happen

DinoSteve wrote...

Yep shoehorn in some MP to take resources and disc space away from SP, also they better add micro-transactions to maximise profits.

DA3 will be 2 discs with MP, what does that tell you about SP.

[xxBabyMonkeyxx]

The only multiplayer I would want is if you're friends could come in as you're companions/party members and take control of them. Anything other than that, NO!!!!

[tez19]

As I have stated before, Bioware are DEAD. They are a company who are quickly losing its fanbase. DA3 will be a failure like DA2 and then with the Mass Effect trilogy finished, Bioware will be left to rot and die. After the last few games they have put out they deserve to be DEAD. BIOWARE IN STEEP DECLINE.

[tez19]

I can see it already '' NOW IN MULTIPLAYER, YOU PRESS A BUTTON, AND SOMETHING AWESOME HAS TO HAPPEN, BUTTON-AWESOME CONNECTED NOW IN DA3 MULTIPLAYER.'' well guess what mate, DA2 WAS NOT AWESOME, IT WAS DOG TURD.

Modifié par tez19, 22 août 2012 - 09:14 .

[Fraq Hound]

As someone who was really pleasantly surprised by the ME3 multiplayer; I'm interested to see what they do with DA3 MP.

I'd really like to see more character customization in the MP and I REALLY hate some of the aspects of their Spectre Pack system. Hopefully they can find a better way of handling loot with DA3.

[Boss Fog]

DinoSteve wrote...

But it is exactly what will happen, look at ME3.

By default I don't think DA3 needs MP, but if it did; Laidlaw has already stated that if they were to include MP, they would model it after Baldur's Gate which didn't take ANYTHING away from SP.  

[Merlex]

Systemlord Baal wrote...

I think it would depend on how the game is designed. If the gameplay leans more toward DA:O or a game like Neverwinter Nights 2, then I think MP could be a great addition to the game, especially in the long run. With a certain kind of MP, there'd be lots of options to do RP in the world of DA. At that point, a mod-kit would also come in handy. But as I said, it would depend on how the game is designed.

All IMO, of course.

How about if they make multiplayer a DLC. They could do the with a toolset as well.

[labargegrrrl]

Merlex wrote...

Systemlord Baal wrote...

I think it would depend on how the game is designed. If the gameplay leans more toward DA:O or a game like Neverwinter Nights 2, then I think MP could be a great addition to the game, especially in the long run. With a certain kind of MP, there'd be lots of options to do RP in the world of DA. At that point, a mod-kit would also come in handy. But as I said, it would depend on how the game is designed.

All IMO, of course.

How about if they make multiplayer a DLC. They could do the with a toolset as well.

^ this i could actually get behind as a respectful compromise for those of us who know MP is the worst idea ever, and those that are completely eager to jump on that bandwagon.  let those who want it, have it, but leave the rest of us ALONE for mercy's sake!

[ArenCordial]

C9316 wrote...

Seriously though, not every damn game needs multiplayer, can't this just be a well done single player experience?

Don't you know every game needs....

-Multiplayer
-Day One DLC
-Microtransactions

to be successful.

*wife mentions Skyrim*

Sssshhhhhhh they might hear you!

[Sanunes]

If reviewers wouldn't be searching for multiplayer in every game they review I think it wouldn't be crammed into every game being made at this time.