My latest concern over MP is whether that would necessitate the removal of the pause button in combat even for the SP experience. That would be truly bad.
Dragon age 3 multiplayer...
Débuté par
Dendio1
, août 12 2012 12:33
Retour en haut
#152
Posté 12 septembre 2012 - 05:50
xraytec
-
- Members
- 65 messages
I see MP in DA3. Then I am done with Bioware, EA, and the Dragon Age series for good!! I mean DA2 wasn't a bad game, but sooo much was taken away, in respect to RPG, that they could have easily changed the title to almost anything. And I don't think the majority of DA fans would have cared. And now they want to again use DA to follow in ME's footsteps?????
#153
Posté 12 septembre 2012 - 09:52
fchopin
-
- Members
- 5 052 messages
I do not approve MP but i don’t think Bioware cares what i think.
#154
Posté 12 septembre 2012 - 06:29
InfinitePaths
-
- Members
- 1 432 messages
I want co-op.And that me and my friends can make decisions together.
#155
Posté 12 septembre 2012 - 11:13
Linksys17
-
- Members
- 528 messages
HeriocGreyWarden wrote...
I want co-op.And that me and my friends can make decisions together.
interesting idea, if Bioware goes that route they might just go full blown mmorpg and that would be terrible and be impossible for your previous decisions apply.... maybe if one player is just an important NPC (irony amirite) I would not want a Dark Souls thing going on then there will be no choices :[
#156
Posté 13 septembre 2012 - 12:16
jbrand2002uk
-
- Members
- 990 messages
Atakuma wrote...
The previous games in that series didn't even have single player campaigns, it was just shoehorned into BF3 to appeal to COD fans. Calling the multiplayer in BF3 a cash grab clearly shows that you have no idea what you're talking about.jbrand2002uk wrote...
Atakuma wrote...
"Because I say so" isn't proof of anything. You are just blindly assuming those flaws are directly related to the inclusion of multiplayer without anything to back it up.Elazul2k wrote...
Thats just stupid. The splitting of funds caused by dividing efforts could easily cause a story to fail to meet expectations in any number of ways. Perhaps the writer wrote a masterful piece, but since they had to split the funds, they ended up cutting down a couple of minor scenes, causing plotholes. The same could easily happen with gameplay features watering down the entire game. To think otherwise is ignoring the business aspects of making a game. I cannot think of a single example of tacked on multiplayer enchancing a game in such a way I would be willing to overlook the flaws such a game would create.
Ok you want proof BF3 enough said the SP story while fairly well written clearly suffers because of the cash grab MP
Ha actually I do know what I'm talking about its like any other EA game including their EASports titles just take a look at all the packs,kits and other DLC's Battlefield was once a SP FPS which EA turned into a MP FPS which shortly after became a cash grab DLC fiasco they have systematically done it with every franchise they have got their filthy hands on each and every one even those that started off as SP games now have MP with copipus amounts of DLC that you can buy to "enhance" your MP experiance so online becomes a case of "he who has the biggest wallet wins" which is why I dont bother with any EA owned franchises that have a MP mode.
Either way BW will have to decide if its making an RPG or an MMO, many bad things can be said about Bethseda but at least they have the common sense to have a seperate TES MMO for all the online and celebrity obsessed braindead zombie masses
#157
Posté 14 septembre 2012 - 03:56
Beerfish
-
- Members
- 23 861 messages
I would imagine it would be very similar to ME3 multilayer which has been quite successful.
Missions.
Various enemy factions.
Coop team play.
No pause.
Striped down set of abilities that can be used.
Bi weekly operations.
Missions.
Various enemy factions.
Coop team play.
No pause.
Striped down set of abilities that can be used.
Bi weekly operations.
#158
Posté 14 septembre 2012 - 03:57
Beerfish
-
- Members
- 23 861 messages
craigdolphin wrote...
My latest concern over MP is whether that would necessitate the removal of the pause button in combat even for the SP experience. That would be truly bad.
It would for sure but it is not as big of a deal as you may think. I am a serial pauser in games. I thought there is no way in the world I could funcion without it but adapted very fast in ME multiplayer. Remember you are just operating one character now and not a whole group.
#159
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 11:51
FoxShadowblade
-
- Members
- 1 017 messages
Jorina Leto wrote...
Dragon Age III's multiplayer will be this: Horde mode and maybe (team) deathmatch.
But there is hope. There will be most likely no Galactic Readiness.
This made me lol
Booting up DA:3 for the first time and see Galactic Readiness, I would snap that disc in half. xD
#160
Posté 26 novembre 2012 - 10:56
Saha Dev
-
- Members
- 14 messages
If its like the multiplayer in mass effect 3 then im game. I love the multiplayer in me3 and id love to see something similar in dragon age 3 , hordes of enemeies the occasional bosses. Sounds good to me. Boware should just ignore them haters and proceed with whatever they think is best. There are some old school fanboys who wish all rpgs were boooring turn based games.Very sad people they are.
#161
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 12:15
damageaddict
-
- Members
- 23 messages
he who has the biggest wallet ALWAYS wins, not just in video games, it's a fact of life and fair or not always will be. I personally think people willing to spend hard earned cash deserve whatever benefits their cash may bring them, especially when hardcore players can unlock absolutely everything (at least in mass effect) at no cost whatsoever if they work at it. The argument is silly... really? A COMPANY that supplies products that take hundreds of staff members and years to create wants money?!? NO WAY!!! How absurd. Multiplayer was only required for the "good" ending in mass effect if you didn't play the first two games (a carried over file would supply more than enough war assets for whatever ending you wanted) and I am very much pro multiplayer in inquisition... People only complain about what they are not getting, or what others are getting instead of them... noone wants to pay attention to the fact that you are getting ANOTHER FULL GAME (practically) for free with multiplayer. I guess you have to have been playing video games for a long time to remember what used to constitute a full release and understand by comparison. as gamers we are given more fan service and hand outs than almost any other form of fandom but god forbid a game have something for everyone, or multiple things for one person going for it, I suppose we would prefer stripped down, less expansive, obvious games with fewer modes/interactions/reasons to keep playing (the majority of us have already proven that with the "better ending" debate).
#162
Posté 11 janvier 2013 - 03:20
Auron_Alexandros
-
- Members
- 7 messages
I'm not completely against the idea, so long as its done right.
Customization- I'd like being able to play as any one of the races in the DA universe, and fully customize that character.. How they look, gender, how they wear their armor, and the color of their armor.
Allow us to buy armor, accessories, weapons, and items, as if in a shop; instead of randomly getting stuff- I don't care how much its priced. If there is a piece of armor, or a weapon I really want. I don't mind playing to get up the gold to buy it. Random boxes are nice for special events- and should be filled with a number of things.
classes- We all know the types of mages that are in DA, and we all had our warriors, archers, and rouges set up differently I'm sure when we played DA 1 and DA 2. What other classes can be brought about in DA3? Allow players of course to select what class they wish, and how they wish to level them. Allow them to switch to another class if they wish (which would start at lv 1 of course). Level cap cannot be something lame like 20. 30 or 35, is a nice cap.
Gameplay- It could be set up the way ME3 MP is, with the hordes, or it could have you attack, and or defend certain areas. Either way, or both; lets keep the enemy intelligent, so players work together and come up with strategies on how to win (imagine doing a battle, that has you defend a mage circle tower from demons). With all the weapons, armor, accessories, and items you can buy or win (after a special event challenge), I wouldn't mind these battles being bonecrushingly hard , with a boss fight plus minions at the end lol.
I'm quite sure combat will be much like DA2, which I did like, though I wish the enemies were much more intelligent, and diverse. It seemed all they did was just fly at you swinging, and all you had to do was mash buttons, and not think. Combat can be a bit more action, without being mindless button mashing. Since the game will be for both the PS4, 720, and PC... Allow all to play togther. Final Fantasy XI did that, (XIV will as well), and it was absolutely brilliant and fun. It can be greatly fun, especially since they've been inspired by the openess, that Skyrim showed.
The tech inside of these new consoles, as I've read so far- and them being able to push engines like the Frostbite 2, this is very possible- while also delivering an awesome single player experience. I also don't mind prices for items being so high, that I cave in and spend real cash from time to time, because I know how hard these guys work, and making games like this, is not cheap.
Customization- I'd like being able to play as any one of the races in the DA universe, and fully customize that character.. How they look, gender, how they wear their armor, and the color of their armor.
Allow us to buy armor, accessories, weapons, and items, as if in a shop; instead of randomly getting stuff- I don't care how much its priced. If there is a piece of armor, or a weapon I really want. I don't mind playing to get up the gold to buy it. Random boxes are nice for special events- and should be filled with a number of things.
classes- We all know the types of mages that are in DA, and we all had our warriors, archers, and rouges set up differently I'm sure when we played DA 1 and DA 2. What other classes can be brought about in DA3? Allow players of course to select what class they wish, and how they wish to level them. Allow them to switch to another class if they wish (which would start at lv 1 of course). Level cap cannot be something lame like 20. 30 or 35, is a nice cap.
Gameplay- It could be set up the way ME3 MP is, with the hordes, or it could have you attack, and or defend certain areas. Either way, or both; lets keep the enemy intelligent, so players work together and come up with strategies on how to win (imagine doing a battle, that has you defend a mage circle tower from demons). With all the weapons, armor, accessories, and items you can buy or win (after a special event challenge), I wouldn't mind these battles being bonecrushingly hard , with a boss fight plus minions at the end lol.
I'm quite sure combat will be much like DA2, which I did like, though I wish the enemies were much more intelligent, and diverse. It seemed all they did was just fly at you swinging, and all you had to do was mash buttons, and not think. Combat can be a bit more action, without being mindless button mashing. Since the game will be for both the PS4, 720, and PC... Allow all to play togther. Final Fantasy XI did that, (XIV will as well), and it was absolutely brilliant and fun. It can be greatly fun, especially since they've been inspired by the openess, that Skyrim showed.
The tech inside of these new consoles, as I've read so far- and them being able to push engines like the Frostbite 2, this is very possible- while also delivering an awesome single player experience. I also don't mind prices for items being so high, that I cave in and spend real cash from time to time, because I know how hard these guys work, and making games like this, is not cheap.
Modifié par Auron_Alexandros, 11 janvier 2013 - 03:36 .
#163
Posté 12 janvier 2013 - 01:24
Vincent Laww
-
- Members
- 126 messages
If the Dragon Age Franchise becomes a multiplayer game then it will no doubt fail. I personally think the only way there can be a multiplayer option in the DA Franchise would be if they turned the series into an Mmorpg. I can't really really foretell how that would play out, but it may be met with some form of success. I however truly don't know.
#164
Posté 13 janvier 2013 - 11:11
vandalDX
-
- Members
- 193 messages
Beerfish wrote...
I would imagine it would be very similar to ME3 multilayer which has been quite successful.
Missions.
Various enemy factions.
Coop team play.
No pause.
Striped down set of abilities that can be used.
Bi weekly operations.
I can't imagine that this wouldn't work brilliantly against hordes of darkspawn. Gold matches against dragons? Superlative. Can't wait. Will play religiously, as with ME3. Cannot wait.
#165
Posté 15 janvier 2013 - 02:18
SoSolaris
-
- Members
- 171 messages
I don't mind multiplayer; I might enjoy it in fact.
I just hope that it won't be tied into the single player campaign ala Mass Effect's galactic readiness scale. I also hope they won't put so much focus into multiplayer at the expense of SP campaign quality.
I just hope that it won't be tied into the single player campaign ala Mass Effect's galactic readiness scale. I also hope they won't put so much focus into multiplayer at the expense of SP campaign quality.
#166
Posté 07 février 2013 - 01:37
hammie360
-
- Members
- 1 messages
i would be ok whit a mp like me3, and if they do put pvp in im ok whit it as long its not pay to win i dont know about the rest of you but i get frustrated if i cant posebly win becouse i dont have a lot of money, it always gets to that point where i just stop playing becouse i cant enjoy myself. just keep it to better looking armor weapons stuf like that.and meybe even put a co-op in so your friends can play your story line as long as they keep the pause option in it should work fine ill leave the last one up to BW
#167
Posté 25 février 2013 - 11:28
cam1616
-
- Members
- 1 messages
After having Dragon age origins for 2 years, I finally got into the game.
I wouldn't mind Multiplayer in DA3, only if it doesn't effect single player and it doesn't hinder any of the development of the single player.
Before I got into DAO, I heard alot of things about Bioware and their games but I never heard anyone say that they bought the game for the multiplayer or loved the multiplayer more than the single player.
I read about in this forum and people said a different team and budget was used for the multiplayer so back to my last paragraph, I don't think many people buy the game because of the multiplayer so why can't Bioware use the money, time and man power that was used on Multiplayer and use it on the single player instead.
No one is not going to buy the game because there isen't multiplayer and the single player is amazing.
MY 2cent:lol:
I wouldn't mind Multiplayer in DA3, only if it doesn't effect single player and it doesn't hinder any of the development of the single player.
Before I got into DAO, I heard alot of things about Bioware and their games but I never heard anyone say that they bought the game for the multiplayer or loved the multiplayer more than the single player.
I read about in this forum and people said a different team and budget was used for the multiplayer so back to my last paragraph, I don't think many people buy the game because of the multiplayer so why can't Bioware use the money, time and man power that was used on Multiplayer and use it on the single player instead.
No one is not going to buy the game because there isen't multiplayer and the single player is amazing.
MY 2cent:lol:
Modifié par cam1616, 25 février 2013 - 11:31 .
#168
Posté 26 avril 2013 - 05:06
DoomBlackDragon
-
- Members
- 133 messages
Well I hope they do not make the same mistake as Mass effect three. Make some crappy last min ending cause the MP took up the budget.
#169
Posté 11 mai 2013 - 06:36
Flaquito_
-
- Members
- 1 messages
ladyofpayne wrote...
Dragon age 3 multiplayer NO! NO! NO! And NOOOOOOOOOO!
Because I want very good single game. DA 3 don't need multiplayer- developers give him too much time and DA 3 will be short like ME 3.
SHUT THE **** UP YOU DUMB **** ASS ****!!!! NO! NO! NO and NOO!! you sound like ****ing 12 year old **** SHUT the **** up!!!!! holy **** just stop playing this game you ****ing **** ******. Everyone wants multiplayer so you can play with your friends and do missions together so shut the **** up you hating ****.
#170
Posté 24 mai 2013 - 12:29
Froswald
-
- Members
- 277 messages
Flaquito_ wrote...
ladyofpayne wrote...
Dragon age 3 multiplayer NO! NO! NO! And NOOOOOOOOOO!
Because I want very good single game. DA 3 don't need multiplayer- developers give him too much time and DA 3 will be short like ME 3.
SHUT THE **** UP YOU DUMB **** ASS ****!!!! NO! NO! NO and NOO!! you sound like ****ing 12 year old **** SHUT the **** up!!!!! holy **** just stop playing this game you ****ing **** ******. Everyone wants multiplayer so you can play with your friends and do missions together so shut the **** up you hating ****.
Who diddled your doodle mate
#171
Posté 25 mai 2013 - 03:10
Swordian
-
- Members
- 13 messages
I want Bioware to greatly improve on the single player aspect of Dragon Age 3, if i wanna play multiplayer i would play a MMORPG instead.
#172
Posté 29 mai 2013 - 09:13
Shasow
-
- Members
- 1 069 messages
Flaquito_ wrote...
ladyofpayne wrote...
Dragon age 3 multiplayer NO! NO! NO! And NOOOOOOOOOO!
Because I want very good single game. DA 3 don't need multiplayer- developers give him too much time and DA 3 will be short like ME 3.
SHUT THE **** UP YOU DUMB **** ASS ****!!!! NO! NO! NO and NOO!! you sound like ****ing 12 year old **** SHUT the **** up!!!!! holy **** just stop playing this game you ****ing **** ******. Everyone wants multiplayer so you can play with your friends and do missions together so shut the **** up you hating ****.
You sound a bit mad.I am against multiplayer. I feel like it's unnecessary. I couldn't ever imagine Dragon Age Origins or Dragon Age 2 with other players, so they would have to make some pretty heavy changes for it to work good. Plus, what about choice? Are two players going to be making the "decisions" presented to you in the game? Or will creating our own story be entirely left out due to multiplayer. People who say multiplayer or co-op is just an "extra" feature are wrong. Bioware will have to sacrafice some singleplayer aspects of the game to make the game multiplayer.
