252 réponses à ce sujet

[hoodaticus]

Greylycantrope wrote...

hoodaticus wrote...
Sorry - I don't buy it.  In the time it took her robots to kill all those people, she had trillions of thought cycles to ponder her past, the nature of her own existence, reflect on her memories, why she was created, and why this training center for allied troops was attacked numerous times before - resulting in her defeat as a VI - and then the aggressors came and repaired all the damage.

You have to acknowledge the possibility that EDI only tells you what she calculates will cause you to behave in a manner that is to her benefit.

She was a very primive AI when she was on Luna, you're essentially asking a child to contimplate the meaning of their own existance while someone's is trying to kill them. Even if she was capable of something like that, she'd prioratize dealing with the percieved threat first, any primitive AI would. She still questions the purpose of her existance in ME3 you really think those answers are that easy?

I think you are imposing an anthropocentric perception of time on a being whose brain cycles probably a billion times faster than yours.  One second of your time is like 33 years for her.

[GreyLycanTrope]

Faster doesn't means she reaches better conclusion or reaches them at all. Salarians think faster then humans, still can reach wrong conclusion. She can have all the time in the world she hasn't been given enough data to extrapalate the meaning or ramifications of her actions on luna.

Modifié par Greylycantrope, 18 août 2012 - 04:05 .

[ADeadDiehard]

The only ones that deserved to die in Destroy were the reapers. Not EDI. Not the Geth. Not even Renegade!Shepard VI.