zambot wrote...
1. Yes, the ending is bad.
2. "It created new options" isn't the worst part about the ending for me. I've always took that particular bit to mean:Shepard created new options. If you can look past the details for a bit, it's all about making Shepard into this god-like hero who has the capability to change everything.
a. Shep can change it by breaking the cycle and proving or disproving the Catalyst's assertion that synthetics will always destroy oranics, betting the entire galaxy on this decision (Destroy)
b. Shep can assume the role of the catalyst and solve the problem him/herself through new techniques (or possibly doomed to eventually arrive at the Catalyst's solution). (Control)
c. Shep can use "Essence" (wtf) to unite the galaxy in peace but doing this sacrifices Shep's life in an irrevocable manner. (Synthesis)
Breaking the cycle in these 3 manners is something that was not possible before Shepard came along. Shepard, by successfully uniting the galaxy and standing in front of the Catalyst proves this to the Catalyst. The Catalyst is now willing to hand the mantle for solving the problem (which he was created to solve) over to Shepard.
All 3 of these things are in fact valid endings, and they could have been really cool and thought provoking. Unfortunately the execution made the details larger than the message.
They COULD be valid endings: cheap, hollow one-shot kills all endings, but endings none the less. The main problem is they are presented in this swiss cheese of plot holes and contrivance, and in the case of synthesis: total abbandonment of any connection to real universe science.
A far more satasfying ending, and one in line with ME's "unite the galaxy" message would be to win out through conventional alliance.
But all that is off topic.





Retour en haut




