KoorahUK wrote...
Actually I was attempting to highlight the narrative context which your assessment of what a 'sane' person would or would not choose to do in that situation completely ignores.
If you choose to view that as validation of your point of view, you go right ahead.
<_<
Scientist: "The crucible has a lot of energy."
Random dude: "Really?"
<_<
Scientist: "Yea..."
Random dude: "Is it a bomb?"
Scientist: "No, I don't believe so."
Random dude: "So, how does it work?"
<_<
Scientist: "No one knows yet..."
Random dude: "Oh... Well, can it be tested?"
<_<
Scientist: "We don't know how."
Random dude: "Oh..."
<_<
Scientist: "...."
Random dude: "Ever thought it could backfire on us? You know, wiping everyone out?"
Scientist: "Maybe, but we're willing to risk it."
Random dude: "You don't say?"
<_<
Scientist: "Yea..."
Random dude: "Was there any other race able to use the crucible before us successfully?"
Scientist: "No, not to my knowledge... They all failed."
Random dude: "Really now?"
<_<
Scientist: "Yea..."
Random dude: "So how will you know if the crucible is enough to beat the reapers?"
<_<
Scientist: "Like I said, we don't know ok? Gosh!"
Random dude: "Why so confident then?"
:innocent:
Scientist: "Because I Believe in Mac."
Random dude: "Who's Mac?"
*
A wild harbinger appears!*
Harbinger: "HE'S THE AUTHOR OF MY PERFECTION."
Random dude: "Oh, right right. He wrote all of this... Everything is starting to make sense... A little. See ya."
THE END...
Modifié par Darth Death, 14 août 2012 - 06:26 .