Huntress wrote...
ianvillan wrote...
Melca36 wrote...
Game content does not mean you will be forced to play ANTI Mage.
Anyway, I think the reason the developers have let this thread stay is because only 10-20% has made it into the actual game and they're getting a good laugh at people buying into the hype.
I dont think that is the case because hype has a chance of backfiring on you, especially if the fans believe that certain things will be happening in the game that aren't.
Biowares statement was that they want to show not tell and that they want feedback from the fans, They have not done any of those things yet and probably wont but if they were to do it, it would not be done in secret.
You are right, is ok if they have an inquisitor whos order is not part of the chantry, wich believe in the Maker but not andraste and the Andrastians rules, I got that part now, What I want to know is if you are forced to play that.
Thats my problem, forced to play a inquisitor when I do not wish to play as one, and I dought this order do not belive in ANdraste when the Maker only spoke to her.. lol! see how everything is round and around, I think this Da3 is going to be as bad as me3, there is very little room left for me to stop thinking this way.
Anyway i do not care if an inquisitor is a companion I dought a mage will ever be inquisitor her/himself when there is a chance that this mage will go up in flames and doom Thedas.
Lets not not judge the game until it comes out.
They would NEVER make a game thats 100% anti mage nor would they make a game thats 100% Pro Templar.
And you will still be able to play as a mage. They would NEVER get rid of that....its too popular of a class.
My suggestion is to stop worrying and WAIT for official announcements.





Retour en haut





