341 réponses à ce sujet

[sH0tgUn jUliA]

Do I get to get up out of the rubble? Yes? Yes? No.... *sigh*

re: painting -- showing that reaper is at least 50,000 years old.

So.... Dawnguard or Leviathan..... well since ME ends @ ME2..... let me know how good it is....

[clarkusdarkus]

Master Che wrote...

clarkusdarkus wrote...

Master Che wrote...

clarkusdarkus wrote...

Well i loathe ME3, hate everything about the direction it took......but i have 700MP spare which i didnt even remember so in theory i wouldnt be wasting that much money on it if i did get it, im also a tightwad so buying that extra 100MP seems an ordeal and waste so i'll youtube it and decide from there.

your rationalizations are feeble

oO_Oo

Wrong......debating whether to get any mass effect dlc speaks volumes of itself..

oO_Oo
You have merely delayed the inevitable

well if someone gives me 100MP you'd be proved right.......feel free to do so

[GreyLycanTrope]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

Not surprised by the date. When does the YouTube version release? The 29th?

My PC is ready.

[Mythanblood]

I knew it would be the 28. August. There's a reason why I'M TEH KING/EMPEROR OF THE BSN. CHEESE FOR EVERYONE!!
And before anyone asks: The cheese isn't worth 800 Points. But it tastes like the tears of Starbrats. Delicious!

[DirtyPhoenix]

xsdob wrote...

jsl1016 wrote...

Who cares. The ending will STILL SUCK. No more $$ from me for the Mass Effect series.

Samtheman63 wrote...

OMG U BIOWARE SO DUM THIS IS NOT WORTH MY MONEY YTTHIS DOESNT CHANGE ANYTHING WOTS THE POINT!

This proves IT.

[AresKeith]

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Do I get to get up out of the rubble? Yes? Yes? No.... *sigh*

re: painting -- showing that reaper is at least 50,000 years old.

So.... Dawnguard or Leviathan..... well since ME ends @ ME2..... let me know how good it is....

killing Vampires Blade style lol

[ATiBotka]

pirate1802 wrote...

xsdob wrote...

jsl1016 wrote...

Who cares. The ending will STILL SUCK. No more $$ from me for the Mass Effect series.

Samtheman63 wrote...

OMG U BIOWARE SO DUM THIS IS NOT WORTH MY MONEY YTTHIS DOESNT CHANGE ANYTHING WOTS THE POINT!

This proves IT.

Everything proves IT.

[xsdob]

Also, here is a poll for the leviathan dlc, vote in it if you haven;t and let's see how many people want to buy it V. how many people do not, also middle options.

http://social.biowar...5&poll_id=37776

Modifié par xsdob, 15 août 2012 - 07:58 .

[xsdob]

ATiBotka wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

xsdob wrote...

jsl1016 wrote...

Who cares. The ending will STILL SUCK. No more $$ from me for the Mass Effect series.

Samtheman63 wrote...

OMG U BIOWARE SO DUM THIS IS NOT WORTH MY MONEY YTTHIS DOESNT CHANGE ANYTHING WOTS THE POINT!

This proves IT.

Everything proves IT.

IT proves this, IT proves everything.

[shepskisaac]

Yay! Just 2 weeks left! I want it NOWWW!!!

[The Angry One]

F4H bandicoot wrote...

I'm judging it so far on the fact that all previous DLC's have been an excellent purchase for me.
If Weekes has written it, it should be good anyway.

Having Weekes write a story that must conform to Walters' ending is like getting a highly adept construction firm to build a house on a foundation of mud.
Sure, it could be the best house in the world.. but it's still built on mud.

[xsdob]

The Angry One wrote...

F4H bandicoot wrote...

I'm judging it so far on the fact that all previous DLC's have been an excellent purchase for me.
If Weekes has written it, it should be good anyway.

Having Weekes write a story that must conform to Walters' ending is like getting a highly adept construction firm to build a house on a foundation of mud.
Sure, it could be the best house in the world.. but it's still built on mud.

Actaully, it seems more like it's building it in a place with a view some people don't like. Some people love the view, others like it, some poeple think it's okay, others think it's bad and they can live with it, and others think it's a deal breaker and want the whole site moved.

See, a much better anaology than what you used.

[Conniving_Eagle]

xsdob wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

F4H bandicoot wrote...

I'm judging it so far on the fact that all previous DLC's have been an excellent purchase for me.
If Weekes has written it, it should be good anyway.

Having Weekes write a story that must conform to Walters' ending is like getting a highly adept construction firm to build a house on a foundation of mud.
Sure, it could be the best house in the world.. but it's still built on mud.

Actaully, it seems more like it's building it in a place with a view some people don't like. Some people love the view, others like it, some poeple think it's okay, others think it's bad and they can live with it, and others think it's a deal breaker and want the whole site moved.

See, a much better completely different anaology than what you used.

Fixed.

[xsdob]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

xsdob wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

F4H bandicoot wrote...

I'm judging it so far on the fact that all previous DLC's have been an excellent purchase for me.
If Weekes has written it, it should be good anyway.

Having Weekes write a story that must conform to Walters' ending is like getting a highly adept construction firm to build a house on a foundation of mud.
Sure, it could be the best house in the world.. but it's still built on mud.

Actaully, it seems more like it's building it in a place with a view some people don't like. Some people love the view, others like it, some poeple think it's okay, others think it's bad and they can live with it, and others think it's a deal breaker and want the whole site moved.

See, a much better completely different anaology than what you used.

Fixed.

Okay than, please enlighten me on how my analogy is less correct than the angryone's? Or am I missing the fixed part of that and what I typed was just not appropriate in your eyes?

I have a hard time telling which is which.

Modifié par xsdob, 15 août 2012 - 08:12 .

[The Angry One]

xsdob wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

F4H bandicoot wrote...

I'm judging it so far on the fact that all previous DLC's have been an excellent purchase for me.
If Weekes has written it, it should be good anyway.

Having Weekes write a story that must conform to Walters' ending is like getting a highly adept construction firm to build a house on a foundation of mud.
Sure, it could be the best house in the world.. but it's still built on mud.

Actaully, it seems more like it's building it in a place with a view some people don't like. Some people love the view, others like it, some poeple think it's okay, others think it's bad and they can live with it, and others think it's a deal breaker and want the whole site moved.

See, a much better anaology than what you used.

Better analogy to you, perhaps. Not to me.
It is mud. The only difference between me and others is that some others tolerate mud, because it's mud with the BioWare logo stuck on it.

[Conniving_Eagle]

xsdob wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

xsdob wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

F4H bandicoot wrote...

I'm judging it so far on the fact that all previous DLC's have been an excellent purchase for me.
If Weekes has written it, it should be good anyway.

Having Weekes write a story that must conform to Walters' ending is like getting a highly adept construction firm to build a house on a foundation of mud.
Sure, it could be the best house in the world.. but it's still built on mud.

Actaully, it seems more like it's building it in a place with a view some people don't like. Some people love the view, others like it, some poeple think it's okay, others think it's bad and they can live with it, and others think it's a deal breaker and want the whole site moved.

See, a much better completely different anaology than what you used.

Fixed.

Okay than, please enlighten me on how my analogy is less correct than the angryone's? Or am I missing the fixed part of that and what I typed was just not appropriate in your eyes?

I have a hard time telling which is which.

Her analogy was rooted in fact.

Your analogy was rooted in opinion.

The endings are the product of bad writing, that is a fact. Ask anyone with a degree in literature if you don't believe me.

The endings are bad, that doesn't mean that people can't like them.

[xsdob]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

xsdob wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

xsdob wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

F4H bandicoot wrote...

I'm judging it so far on the fact that all previous DLC's have been an excellent purchase for me.
If Weekes has written it, it should be good anyway.

Having Weekes write a story that must conform to Walters' ending is like getting a highly adept construction firm to build a house on a foundation of mud.
Sure, it could be the best house in the world.. but it's still built on mud.

Actaully, it seems more like it's building it in a place with a view some people don't like. Some people love the view, others like it, some poeple think it's okay, others think it's bad and they can live with it, and others think it's a deal breaker and want the whole site moved.

See, a much better completely different anaology than what you used.

Fixed.

Okay than, please enlighten me on how my analogy is less correct than the angryone's? Or am I missing the fixed part of that and what I typed was just not appropriate in your eyes?

I have a hard time telling which is which.

Her analogy was rooted in fact.

Your analogy was rooted in opinion.

The endings are the product of bad writing, that is a fact. Ask anyone with a degree in literature if you don't believe me.

The endings are bad, that doesn't mean that people can't like them.

So people who like the endings, are okay with the endings, thought they were tolerable...what? Do they not exsist? Is it my opinon that they exsist? Are they delusional by your example? have inferior taste to you? honetly all my post did was make a much more reasonable and fair anaology, and not a backhanded one to everyone who doesn't hate the endings.

Just becasue you liked the hyperbole of angryone's post doesn't make it right.

Modifié par xsdob, 15 août 2012 - 08:19 .

[Taboo]

It looks like this is set to paint the Reapers as fallible.

I'd say that's a good thing.

[Mazebook]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

xsdob wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

xsdob wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

F4H bandicoot wrote...

I'm judging it so far on the fact that all previous DLC's have been an excellent purchase for me.
If Weekes has written it, it should be good anyway.

Having Weekes write a story that must conform to Walters' ending is like getting a highly adept construction firm to build a house on a foundation of mud.
Sure, it could be the best house in the world.. but it's still built on mud.

Actaully, it seems more like it's building it in a place with a view some people don't like. Some people love the view, others like it, some poeple think it's okay, others think it's bad and they can live with it, and others think it's a deal breaker and want the whole site moved.

See, a much better completely different anaology than what you used.

Fixed.

Okay than, please enlighten me on how my analogy is less correct than the angryone's? Or am I missing the fixed part of that and what I typed was just not appropriate in your eyes?

I have a hard time telling which is which.

Her analogy was rooted in fact.

Your analogy was rooted in opinion.

The endings are the product of bad writing, that is a fact. Ask anyone with a degree in literature if you don't believe me.

The endings are bad, that doesn't mean that people can't like them.

guys...this is silly...why do you have to talk about the ending AGAIN?

"That is your opinion."
"No, my opinion is fact."

dah dah dah.

I think everybody knows by now where everybody stands on that issue.

Modifié par maaaze, 15 août 2012 - 08:19 .

[alsonamedbort]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

xsdob wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

xsdob wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

F4H bandicoot wrote...

I'm judging it so far on the fact that all previous DLC's have been an excellent purchase for me.
If Weekes has written it, it should be good anyway.

Having Weekes write a story that must conform to Walters' ending is like getting a highly adept construction firm to build a house on a foundation of mud.
Sure, it could be the best house in the world.. but it's still built on mud.

Actaully, it seems more like it's building it in a place with a view some people don't like. Some people love the view, others like it, some poeple think it's okay, others think it's bad and they can live with it, and others think it's a deal breaker and want the whole site moved.

See, a much better completely different anaology than what you used.

Fixed.

Okay than, please enlighten me on how my analogy is less correct than the angryone's? Or am I missing the fixed part of that and what I typed was just not appropriate in your eyes?

I have a hard time telling which is which.

Her analogy was rooted in fact because I agree with it.

Your analogy was rooted in opinion because I don't like it.

Fixed.

[JockBuster]

What worries me is the line

NO War, only Harvest

which does NOT make a whole lot of sense, IF Shepard is harvested BEFORE the ending

[GreyLycanTrope]

Taboo-XX wrote...

It looks like this is set to paint the Reapers as fallible.

I'd say that's a good thing.

When weren't they fallible though?

[T-Raks]

Excited. Still so many questions open. I hope the some answers we get will be well thought through.

[xsdob]

Okay, dropping it now. eagle, angryone, I am sorry for snapping at you. I wanted to make an analogy that was more fair to everyone, not rain on your parades.

This dlc is exciting for a lot of people, I'm leaving it at that.

Apologies for quote pyramiding, hope we can leave this settled.

[puppy maclove]

Does the DLC affect the ending???? Otherwise what's the point? (assuming the current ending/s ruin the series for you)